Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Troops Landing losses

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Troops Landing losses Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 10:21:04 AM   
MadDawg

 

Posts: 374
Joined: 6/24/2004
Status: offline 		Hi All,

Currently I have seen some pretty huge losses when I land at a base with no defensive units (one unit today lost 18 squads and a bunch of weapons). Anyone have any idea what this represent? It seems like a lot of troops to loose even accounting for accidents, etc?

Dawg
Post #: 1
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 10:31:18 AM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MadDawg

Hi All,

Currently I have seen some pretty huge losses when I land at a base with no defensive units (one unit today lost 18 squads and a bunch of weapons). Anyone have any idea what this represent? It seems like a lot of troops to loose even accounting for accidents, etc?

Dawg


You are experiencing mostly men getting sick, disrupted, tired - whatever you want to call it.. They aren't actually getting killed - just taken out of combat. You can prepare your units which cut down on these losses quite a bit. Other than that I don't know of anything else you can do, other than have an HQ with them (and amphibious command ship - if allies).

Xargun

(in reply to MadDawg)
Post #: 2
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 10:52:59 AM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline 		I notice that the AI takes a lot fewer losses. The most I have seen so far is several hundred. Maybe this has to do with it being 1941. Or maybe the silly thing knows something that we dont.

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 3
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 11:58:31 AM   
grraven2004


Posts: 273
Joined: 3/4/2004
From: Cuyahoga Falls OH
Status: offline 		Also could be taking into account that some of the citizens might resist an invasion as well as the other factors mentioned.

(in reply to Onime No Kyo)
Post #: 4
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 12:14:29 PM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline 		I remember the question came up in a beta some time ago. What they said was that its rather easy to fall overboard, break a leg, hit your head, etc climbing over cargo nets under enemy fire. But like Xarg said, I think most of it comes from disruption, troops landing in the wrong place, being sea sick and so on.

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to grraven2004)
Post #: 5
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 12:40:06 PM   
MadDawg

 

Posts: 374
Joined: 6/24/2004
Status: offline 		Thanks for the feedback guys!

One thing though...wouldnt the disruption part of the landing be handing up upping the distruption value of the units? I think this would be much easier for them to recover from than the losses they currently take.

In the example I notices I had a unit of about 27 squads take 18 of those as losses in an uncontested landing (dont forget Im talking about empty bases here :-)). It just seems that about 180 of my guys having broken legs and bumped heads out of a total of around 270 is well, kinda high, hehe.

The possability locals are contesting the landings is another idea, but Im not sure that happened on a large scale...

Dawg

< Message edited by MadDawg -- 7/5/2004 11:36:01 AM >

(in reply to MadDawg)
Post #: 6
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 4:20:48 PM   
GBirkn


Posts: 249
Joined: 5/6/2004
From: the briny deep
Status: offline 		As I saw it explained by one of the beta testers, disruption goes up too, but the "casualties" you see in the reports of landings are of troops and weapons being disabled, rather than disrupted. Disabled means that they can't fight at all until they get repaired, while disrupted means they fight, but not as well.

So imagine these casualties representing a soldier who drops his rifle in the ocean, a howitzer out of action for lack of spare parts that were packed on the wrong ship, that sort of thing. They still exist, but need some time and supplies to get back in action.

< Message edited by GBirkn -- 7/5/2004 9:21:08 AM >

_____________________________

"War is the remedy our enemies have chosen, and I say let's give them all they want." -- Gen. W. T. Sherman

(in reply to MadDawg)
Post #: 7
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 4:53:24 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline 		Correct, destroyed counts as 2 kills, disabled counts as 1. Rested, the disabled boys will recover.

(in reply to GBirkn)
Post #: 8
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 5:07:16 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline 		Did you give them enough time to get their prep level up before the invasion? That helps reduce losses.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 9
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 8:34:57 PM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline 		hum prep level.. is that on the unit or the tf screen?

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 10
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 8:40:59 PM   
MarkD34

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 6/29/2004
From: Ontario,Canada
Status: offline 		Its on the individual ground unit screen bottom right hand corner "set future objectives".The number in () is the prep points the unit has from 0 to 100.

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 11
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/5/2004 8:46:58 PM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline 		doh.. makes sense now that you think of it.. probably bounced out the first few times do to brain hard drive over scan and lack of sleep.. got in trouble with the wife again.. up till 5 AM this morn..

(in reply to MarkD34)
Post #: 12
RE: Troops Landing losses - 7/6/2004 1:01:55 AM   
MadDawg

 

Posts: 374
Joined: 6/24/2004
Status: offline 		Thanks for the feedback guys!

No, no preperation as this was the first turn of the corel sea battle where troops are automatically set up to capture Lunga, etc, so I let them go. The unit I am referring to is the one that captured Lunga. I just checked it has 17 lost squads and has 17 active, thus it has basically lost half of its men to accidents whilst hopping off at an undefended island.

So, I guess my next question is...doesnt this seem a little high?

When there Japanese invaded Guam early in the were they went in vs 122 odd Marines and only suffered 1 dead and 6 wounded. Although these troops were obviously taken off guard and the Japanese prepared. considering the landing on Lunga was uncontested, Im just wondering if 170 men out of action seems a bit much. Below is a link with the description of the guam battle, posted early, for those interested...

http://www.ospreypublishing.com/title_detail.php?per=47&title=S8111&view=spread&view=extract

Dawg

(in reply to GBirkn)
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Troops Landing losses Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.203