Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

What the Heck is this thing?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> What the Heck is this thing? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
What the Heck is this thing? - 1/8/2002 8:44:00 PM   
panda124c

 

Posts: 1692
Joined: 5/23/2000
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline 		Playing the Germans in a long WWII Campain I came across a French tank (?) called the FT-17 75BS, it look like a 75mm armed FT-17 with a range of 120. Just what is this thing?????? [ January 08, 2002: Message edited by: pbear ]



_____________________________
Post #: 1
- 1/8/2002 9:05:00 PM   
FNG


Posts: 514
Joined: 1/3/2002
From: Devizes, UK
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by pbear:
Playing the Germans in a long WWII Campain I came across a French tank (?) called the FT-17 75BS, it look like a 75mm armed FT-17 with a range of 120. Just what is this thing?????? [ January 08, 2002: Message edited by: pbear ]
Check out: http://www.shadowsfolly.com/wwii/France/FT17.htm Apparently it's an FT-17 modified by the Germans to carry a short 75mm.

_____________________________

FNG
Our doubts are traitors, and make us lose the good we oft might win by fearing to attempt.

(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 2
- 1/9/2002 12:14:00 AM   
Warhorse


Posts: 5712
Joined: 5/12/2000
From: Birdsboro, PA, USA
Status: offline 		Not really, the Germans may have modified some also, but it was a French support tank, although pretty sure not many were thusly equipped. I am at work, but I remember reading about it's limited use in French service. It mounted the 75mm Blockhause howitzer.

_____________________________

Mike Amos

Meine Ehre heißt Treue
www.cslegion.com

(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 3
- 1/9/2002 2:55:00 AM   
panda124c

 

Posts: 1692
Joined: 5/23/2000
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline 		Thanks, I'd really like to see a picture of this monstrosity, wonder where the gunner sat since it's a one man turrent with not much room for the 37mm much less a 75mm.

_____________________________


(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 4
- 1/9/2002 3:48:00 AM   
asgrrr

 

Posts: 529
Joined: 9/18/2001
From: Iceland
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by pbear:
Thanks, I'd really like to see a picture of this monstrosity, wonder where the gunner sat since it's a one man turrent with not much room for the 37mm much less a 75mm.
I don't think this can possibly be a turreted vehicle...

_____________________________

Never hate your enemy.
It clouds your judgement.

(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 5
- 1/9/2002 6:56:00 AM   
Warhorse


Posts: 5712
Joined: 5/12/2000
From: Birdsboro, PA, USA
Status: offline 		It is indeed a turreted vehicle, there was one FT-17 75BS included (optimumly)in each section, ie platoon, of 5 FT-17M/C.I have a whole book by squadron on the FT series, unfortunately it's packed away for moving now!! Here's a link for a pic of one.. http://mtg.ipx.pl/francja/ft.htm [ January 08, 2002: Message edited by: Warhorse ]



_____________________________

Mike Amos

Meine Ehre heißt Treue
www.cslegion.com

(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 6
- 1/9/2002 9:29:00 AM   
Warrior


Posts: 1808
Joined: 11/2/2000
From: West Palm Beach, FL USA
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by FNG:
[QB] Check out: http://www.shadowsfolly.com/wwii/France/FT17.htm
QB]
This is a great site, thanks for posting it.

_____________________________

Retreat is NOT an option.



(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 7
- 1/9/2002 7:35:00 PM   
panda124c

 

Posts: 1692
Joined: 5/23/2000
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Warhorse:
It is indeed a turreted vehicle, there was one FT-17 75BS included (optimumly)in each section, ie platoon, of 5 FT-17M/C.I have a whole book by squadron on the FT series, unfortunately it's packed away for moving now!! Here's a link for a pic of one.. http://mtg.ipx.pl/francja/ft.htm [ January 08, 2002: Message edited by: Warhorse ]
Wow, now thats a small 75mm, looks like you could carry it in your back pocket, thanks for the picture.

_____________________________


(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 8
- 1/9/2002 8:20:00 PM   
toundra

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 4/10/2001
From: France
Status: offline 		Everything you want to know about the FT17 all in French but tons of pictures http://perso.club-internet.fr/po2260/FT17/FT17.htm here is a picture of the FT 17 BS
and the "75 mm houwitzer BR Pétoire(this is almost impossible to translate but a pétoire is an old gun more noisy than effective =)" http://members.tripod.com/~panzerlm/ft17bsaj.htm

_____________________________


(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 9
- 1/10/2002 12:51:00 AM   
panda124c

 

Posts: 1692
Joined: 5/23/2000
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Toundra:
Everything you want to know about the FT17 all in French but tons of pictures http://perso.club-internet.fr/po2260/FT17/FT17.htm here is a picture of the FT 17 BS
and the "75 mm houwitzer BR Pétoire(this is almost impossible to translate but a pétoire is an old gun more noisy than effective =)" http://members.tripod.com/~panzerlm/ft17bsaj.htm
Fantastic site.

_____________________________


(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 10
- 1/10/2002 4:33:00 AM   
Jacc

 

Posts: 265
Joined: 4/30/2001
From: Viikki Imperium
Status: offline 		FT-17 was available as both "male" and "female" (male armed with cannon, female with machine guns). The FT-17 armed with short 75 mm cannon was produced in large quantities after WW1, and had significant effect (as well as Christine) in further tank designs - many Soviet tanks adapted the advances of FT-17, which was considered useful. Mounting a short cannon, and carrying light armour, the tank was not adopted for anti-tank role, but was instead an infantry support model. Finns bought few of these at 1930s (I think), but since good Soviet tanks became available from November 1939 onwards, the FT-17s were dug in as pillboxes. (Before that they were assigned for Panssaridivisioona). Turning turret was armed with 37mm AT-gun. FT-17 is, thus, quite a remarkable tank, but from totally different era than tanks of SPWAW. As well as this should we remember Christie (ultimately resulting as T-34).

_____________________________

Pain is for the weak.

(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 11
- 1/10/2002 3:13:00 PM   
Jarkko

 

Posts: 75
Joined: 1/6/2001
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by James Coscinu:

Finns bought few of these at 1930s (I think), but since good Soviet tanks became available from November 1939 onwards, the FT-17s were dug in as pillboxes. (Before that they were assigned for Panssaridivisioona). Turning turret was armed with 37mm AT-gun. .
I am sorry to say you have partly wrong data. Finland never had FT-17 armed with 75 mm gun. Finland bought its 32 FT-17 tanks at summer of year 1919 from France. Only exception to this were two FT-17 (one "male" and one "female") given by French at 1921 as replacements to tanks that French had made Finns to "borrow" to General Judenich's North-West White Army of Russian Civil War (the "borrowed" ones were returned in really bad shape). From the total 34 FT-17 tanks that Finns had 15 were "male" (armed with 37mm Puteaux gun used already in WW1) and 19 were "female" (armed with French 8 mm machinegun until year 1936, at which point they were rearmed with 7.62 mm air-cooled Maxim machinegun). Finnish "Panssaridivisioona" (=Armour Division) was established during Continuation War (around 1942 during it). Unit using them just before Winter War was "Panssari Pataljoona" (=Tank battalion). Data about being used only as pillboxes (method used: FT-17 tanks were simply dug in, so that only turret was above ground) during Winter War (1939 - 1940) is correct. Almost all FT-17 got destroyed in battles (only 4 survived). These might have been in training use after that (until 1943), but they never saw battle use during Continuation War (1941 - 1944). No 37 mm AT-gun was installed in any of Finnish FT-17 tanks (turret would have most probably been too small for 37 mm Bofors at-gun). Actual main reason behind not being used as tanks (instead of pillpoxes) during Winter War was the poor armour penetration capability of 37 mm Puteaux (L/21?) guns (and ammunition used in them) revealed by live fire tests done at 1938.

_____________________________


(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 12
- 1/10/2002 5:12:00 PM   
toundra

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 4/10/2001
From: France
Status: offline 		All you need to know about French guns
and the famous 75 mm Puteaux gun. http://www.miniatures.de/html/int/canon75mmMLE1897-1940.html http://www.miniatures.de/html/int/shellsWx.html http://www.miniatures.de/html/int/shellsF.html ( i live in Puteaux )

_____________________________


(in reply to panda124c)
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> What the Heck is this thing? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.898