Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm depending on port size...

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm depending on port size...

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm depending on port size...

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm depending on... - 7/15/2004 12:38:09 PM

Apollo11

Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline

Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm depending on port size...

Hi all,

I got my WitP yesterday and I only quickly read the manual (don't ask me when I went to bed last night) but I think I didn't see and change regarding TF refuel/rearm in WitP compared to UV...

TF Rearming (replenishing ammo)

Right now (as far as I know now) any TF can rearm (replenish ammo) all guns (all calibers) in any size port.

IMHO this is not OK and should be changed.

Since we have the torpedo load restrictions and mine load restrictions why not add the restrictions for different guns (based on gun caliber)?

Why not add restriction that depending of port size only certain gun caliber ammo can be rearmed?

Port size 1-2: Ammo for below 5" caliber

Port size 3-4-5: All previous + ammo for above 5" caliber

Port size 6-7-8: All previous + ammo for above 8" caliber

Port size 9-10: All previous + ammo for above 10" caliber

TF Refueling

Right now (as far as I know now) any TF can refuel at any speed (i.e. take same amount of fuel) in any size port.

IMHO this is not OK and should be changed.

Why not add restriction that depending of port size the refuel takes more OPs (operation points) and thus take more time in smaller port size?

For example the 15 ship TF totally empty would be able to refuel fully in port size of, let's say, 6 and spend maximum number of OPs (operation points) but that same TF in port size of, let's say, 2 would only load 33% of fuel.

What do you say gentleman?

Matrix/2By3: any hope for this in some future WitP patch?

Leo "Apollo11"

Post #: 1

RE: Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm dependin... - 7/15/2004 9:26:09 PM

Tanaka

Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm depending on port size...

Hi all,

I got my WitP yesterday and I only quickly read the manual (don't ask me when I went to bed last night) but I think I didn't see and change regarding TF refuel/rearm in WitP compared to UV...

TF Rearming (replenishing ammo)

Right now (as far as I know now) any TF can rearm (replenish ammo) all guns (all calibers) in any size port.

IMHO this is not OK and should be changed.

Since we have the torpedo load restrictions and mine load restrictions why not add the restrictions for different guns (based on gun caliber)?

Why not add restriction that depending of port size only certain gun caliber ammo can be rearmed?

Port size 1-2: Ammo for below 5" caliber

Port size 3-4-5: All previous + ammo for above 5" caliber

Port size 6-7-8: All previous + ammo for above 8" caliber

Port size 9-10: All previous + ammo for above 10" caliber

TF Refueling

Right now (as far as I know now) any TF can refuel at any speed (i.e. take same amount of fuel) in any size port.

IMHO this is not OK and should be changed.

Why not add restriction that depending of port size the refuel takes more OPs (operation points) and thus take more time in smaller port size?

For example the 15 ship TF totally empty would be able to refuel fully in port size of, let's say, 6 and spend maximum number of OPs (operation points) but that same TF in port size of, let's say, 2 would only load 33% of fuel.

What do you say gentleman?

Matrix/2By3: any hope for this in some future WitP patch?

Leo "Apollo11"

yes i agree! look at our discussion on AE ships. this seems to make them useless.

http://www.matrixgames.com/default.asp?URL=http%3A//www.matrixgames.com/forums/

< Message edited by Tanaka -- 7/15/2004 2:26:42 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Apollo11)

Post #: 2

RE: Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm dependin... - 7/15/2004 9:27:32 PM

Mr.Frag

Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline

Leo, all that stuff is already on the "Wish List" just so you know.

(in reply to Tanaka)

Post #: 3

RE: Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm dependin... - 7/16/2004 1:00:39 PM

Apollo11

Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline

Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

Leo, all that stuff is already on the "Wish List" just so you know.

_GREAT_ !!!

Thanks a lot for info!

BTW, was that added on wish list long ago (i.e. by you BETA testers)?

Leo "Apollo11"

(in reply to Mr.Frag)

Post #: 4

RE: Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm dependin... - 7/16/2004 1:41:29 PM

Brun

Posts: 4
Joined: 7/8/2004
Status: offline

10" + requirement is too high. Singapore has battleships and 15" coastal gluns but is only size 8 port, no 15" ammo.

(in reply to Apollo11)

Post #: 5

RE: Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm dependin... - 7/16/2004 2:49:49 PM

Mr.Frag

Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline

quote:

BTW, was that added on wish list long ago (i.e. by you BETA testers)?

Yea, by about 4 or 5 of us ... just bigger fish to fry ... as I keep saying, bugs first then we'll know where we stand

(in reply to Apollo11)

Post #: 6

RE: Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm dependin... - 7/16/2004 2:55:02 PM

Apollo11

Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline

Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

quote:

BTW, was that added on wish list long ago (i.e. by you BETA testers)?

Yea, by about 4 or 5 of us ... just bigger fish to fry ... as I keep saying, bugs first then we'll know where we stand

RGR

Let's keep our collective fingers crossed!

Leo "Apollo11"

(in reply to Mr.Frag)

Post #: 7

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Ideas for change regarding TF refuel/rearm depending on port size...

Page: [1]