IronDuke_slith
Posts: 1595
Joined: 6/30/2002 From: Manchester, UK Status: offline
|
I'd advise against it. I remain unconvinced about UV MED. The land combat engine just doesn't cut it. The battle of the Atlantic done UV style would be boring. At a strategic level, sub ops are just not exiting. The occasional chase of a German surface raider (Scharnhost, Bismark etc) would not satisfy those used to nightly destroyer actions off the Canal. UV MED has more material, but I'm not convinced it would offer the same sort of exitement as anything done in the pacific. Again, the land combat engine would not do the fighting in North Africa any justice. They could improve it of course, but to do it justice, it would take over the game, and not give you the balance you have currently between sea, air and land. I'd love to see their treatment of the Eastern front, and would pay whatever they wanted for it. I just think WITP has gone about as far as it can in terms of theatres. UV MED might work as an add on if it could be done, but I'm not sure the material is there for anything as meaty as UV. Still, Just my very humble opinion. Besides, I have a decade of gameplay with WITP ahead of me, so I'm not sure I would even have time for UV MED. Regards, IronDuke
< Message edited by IronDuke -- 7/28/2004 9:39:57 PM >
|