Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Ramblings

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Ramblings Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Ramblings - 9/8/2001 5:06:00 AM   
byron13


Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline
Based on the lack of conversation these past couple of days, I'm guessing we've really kicked around all of the big issues. So I was just sitting here thinking about issues, issues that make me go "Hmmmmm . . ." Was the Corsair really such a good fighter? Or was it just fast? In a hypothesized surface action between the Japanese and American fleets (no carriers), the Americans would have won, right? Or would the long lance torpedoes have caused the battleship line a real problem? Why are American carriers so much easier to sink in War in the Pacific than the Japanese? Is it a cheat built in for the computer (playing the Japanese), thinner armor, better pilots, or better weapons? Always pisses me off. What would have happened at Pearl if they'd sent something up to investigate the radar contact that they misinterpreted as being the B-17's from the mainland?

_____________________________

Post #: 1
- 9/8/2001 6:13:00 AM   
Chiteng

 

Posts: 7666
Joined: 2/20/2001
From: Raleigh,nc,usa
Status: offline
I am sorry Byron but my Jap CV always sink
after the first ambush. They are not hard to sink at all. What I dislike is that you cannot re-create
Savo Island. I have NEVER seen the Jap torp
as effective in that game as they actually were.

_____________________________

“It is clear that the individual who persecutes a man, his brother, because he is not of the same opinion, is a monster.”

Voltaire

'For those with faith, no proof is needed. For those without faith, no proof is enough'

French Priest

"Statistic

(in reply to byron13)
Post #: 2
- 9/8/2001 6:23:00 AM   
Ringbolt

 

Posts: 53
Joined: 6/15/2001
From: Pensacola, Fl
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by byron:
Based on the lack of conversation these past couple of days, I'm guessing we've really kicked around all of the big issues. So I was just sitting here thinking about issues, issues that make me go "Hmmmmm . . ." Was the Corsair really such a good fighter? Or was it just fast? In a hypothesized surface action between the Japanese and American fleets (no carriers), the Americans would have won, right? Or would the long lance torpedoes have caused the battleship line a real problem? Why are American carriers so much easier to sink in War in the Pacific than the Japanese? Is it a cheat built in for the computer (playing the Japanese), thinner armor, better pilots, or better weapons? Always pisses me off. What would have happened at Pearl if they'd sent something up to investigate the radar contact that they misinterpreted as being the B-17's from the mainland?
Yes the F4U was a great fighter, the proof is it was in service longer than any other WWII fighter. The P51 was also used early in Korea, but the F4U renamed as the AU-1 was used until 1954 I think. The F6F and F4U were equal in many ways only the F4U was a lot faster. Good question about the surface action. The Long Lance would absolutely have been a factor, but the end result would I think depend on the date. Before US radar and South Dakota/Washington class I think the IJN wins, after they loose. I dont know for sure but I think the US CV sinking thing is a cheat. Early on though, like at Midway, the US would send many more aircraft to do the same damage so maybe that is accurate. Only 5 Kate's, I think, did more damage to the Yorktown than all the US Devastators put together which was what, 36? About the radar contact, I think the IJN still would get through no problem, but the US might have had time to button up and man AA guns. I dont think AC at Pearl, Ewa, or Hickam would have made much of an impression, but buttoned up BB's and manned AA guns would have.
Ringbolt

_____________________________

LtCom: "Sgt. Lee, is that a Navy Cross I see you wearing?" Sgt. Lee: "No Sir, it's three."

(in reply to byron13)
Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Ramblings Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.016