Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Amphib Assault

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> Amphib Assault Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Amphib Assault - 12/3/2004 10:49:50 PM   
Cpt.Buckmaster


Posts: 65
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Status: offline
I'm about to send a US Army force in (the marines are occupied ATM ) to take a medium-defended Japanese base (3-4 units sighted). Since you guys are all so wise and seasoned (hehe), I'd like to hear what 'salad' of ground units you guys would land there if you were planning the invasion. A few basic details about the base (which will remain unnamed at this time... heh) has a size 4 AF, 75-100 costal guns, and is on a medium-sized land mass (i.e. not an island, but not a continent either). Also, I don't anticipate any huge counter-attacks since there aren't many other enemy ground forces within any distance to worry about. I'd like to drop on in, fight a few rounds, laugh at a final banzai charge, and then set up shop at the airfield for some medium-bombing and whatnot.

For example, I was thinking of landing the following cast of characters:

1 x USA Inf
1 x USA Cav
1 x USA Arty
1 x EAB
1 x Aviation Rgt
3 x Seebees

Now, I'm sure the above force would probably do alright, but I'm still kindof a rookie here and I'd like to hear other people's strategies and thoughts.

_____________________________

"In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard!"-Theodore Roosevelt
Post #: 1
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/3/2004 11:59:56 PM   
anarchyintheuk

 

Posts: 3921
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Dallas
Status: offline
For invasions I use the "one more" rule. If I think I have enough, I add one more rgt/div to the invasion force if I can support them and it's available. Make sure you've done all the prep work on the target that you'll need too (recon, prep your units, air/naval bombard, etc.). Good luck with your as yet unspecified target.

(in reply to Cpt.Buckmaster)
Post #: 2
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/4/2004 12:12:37 AM   
DrewMatrix


Posts: 1429
Joined: 7/15/2004
Status: offline
Regarding your invasion mix: I agree you want the EAB, Seabees, base force, air support units nearby so you can repair the base ASAP (to unload the rest of your troops even faster) and to get the base working for you quickly.

But you probably shouldn't land non-combat units in the first wave. That first wave (while the enemy controls the base) will take operational losses (broken ankle getting out of the boat) losses and the ships will likely take shore-battery hits. You only want units with big assault factors (Inf, Cav and maybe arty) in the intial wave. Have the others sit 1 hex away until the beach is friendly.

_____________________________


Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.

(in reply to anarchyintheuk)
Post #: 3
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/4/2004 1:13:08 AM   
2ndACR


Posts: 5665
Joined: 8/31/2003
From: Irving,Tx
Status: offline
I hope you are not refering to UV style of banzai attacks. They do not happen anymore.

Japanese forces can last quite a while before you defeat them. I would try and get an idea of what exactly is there before invading. Even a Japanese brigade dug in with good forts can exact a huge toll on your invasion forces. If it is a division, I would bring alot more firepower.

(in reply to DrewMatrix)
Post #: 4
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/4/2004 1:43:57 AM   
Cpt.Buckmaster


Posts: 65
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Status: offline
Great advice so far fellas... I appreciate it.

As far as the banzai thing goes, I'm talking about when you've backed a smaller japanese group to the wall and just before you 'destroy' the unit you get a message like 'xx inf div banzai attacks!.' I've gotten a couple chuckles out of that.



_____________________________

"In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard!"-Theodore Roosevelt

(in reply to 2ndACR)
Post #: 5
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/4/2004 4:43:15 AM   
dereck


Posts: 2800
Joined: 9/7/2004
From: Romulus, MI
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Cpt.Buckmaster

I'm about to send a US Army force in (the marines are occupied ATM ) to take a medium-defended Japanese base (3-4 units sighted). Since you guys are all so wise and seasoned (hehe), I'd like to hear what 'salad' of ground units you guys would land there if you were planning the invasion. A few basic details about the base (which will remain unnamed at this time... heh) has a size 4 AF, 75-100 costal guns, and is on a medium-sized land mass (i.e. not an island, but not a continent either). Also, I don't anticipate any huge counter-attacks since there aren't many other enemy ground forces within any distance to worry about. I'd like to drop on in, fight a few rounds, laugh at a final banzai charge, and then set up shop at the airfield for some medium-bombing and whatnot.

For example, I was thinking of landing the following cast of characters:

1 x USA Inf
1 x USA Cav
1 x USA Arty
1 x EAB
1 x Aviation Rgt
3 x Seebees

Now, I'm sure the above force would probably do alright, but I'm still kindof a rookie here and I'd like to hear other people's strategies and thoughts.


Just my personal opinion but I try to have at least a 3:1 superiority in combat troops when I invade. I believe my last invasion in the Solomons I sent two Marine Divisions and a Regimental Combat Team into an island that ended up only having a SNLF and an engineer unit. They didn't last long.

_____________________________

PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)

(in reply to Cpt.Buckmaster)
Post #: 6
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/6/2004 8:07:11 PM   
derwho

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 8/22/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
Some very good comments about how to prepare assaults against positions but I'd like to hear your opinions on how to defend!

I'm especially interested in strategy and tactics on how to defend the Gilberts and Marshalls.

_____________________________

Imperial Field Service Code (senjinkun):
"Remember always the good reputation of your family and the opinion of people of your birthplace. Do not shame yourself by being taken prisoner alive; die so as to not leave behind a soiled name."

(in reply to dereck)
Post #: 7
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/8/2004 12:14:37 PM   
ctid98


Posts: 146
Joined: 6/19/2003
Status: offline
All I'd like to add is RECON, RECON, RECON!!!!

I'm making my way up the Solomans at the moment, have just landed on Munda and I'm about to send 4 Raider Battalions up to Buin as it seems lightly defended. Intel had it that there was only 1 unit there, but no idea what type of how many. For such a small place no problem, probably a small base force for the Marines to blood themselves on. So I decided I'd send a bombardment TF up to soften them up before landing the troops. Boy am I glad I did that!!! Not because it did a lot of damage but because I have my float planes on battleships set to recon and after a couple of flights the enemy ground troops grew from 1 spotted unit to 6,000 troops, to 10,000 to 12,000!!!!

Unsurprisingly I've re-evaluated the situation and added a combat team to the assault force to give the Marines a bit of backup, plus hitting the base with 4 B-17 groups out of Gili Gili! I'd send in a Marine division but they're prepped for follow one operations at Shortlands which also 'seems' lightly defended..........

_____________________________

---------------------
Tora! Tora! Tora!

(in reply to Cpt.Buckmaster)
Post #: 8
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/10/2004 9:47:07 PM   
Cpt.Buckmaster


Posts: 65
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ctid98

All I'd like to add is RECON, RECON, RECON!!!!

I'm making my way up the Solomans at the moment, have just landed on Munda and I'm about to send 4 Raider Battalions up to Buin as it seems lightly defended. Intel had it that there was only 1 unit there, but no idea what type of how many. For such a small place no problem, probably a small base force for the Marines to blood themselves on. So I decided I'd send a bombardment TF up to soften them up before landing the troops. Boy am I glad I did that!!! Not because it did a lot of damage but because I have my float planes on battleships set to recon and after a couple of flights the enemy ground troops grew from 1 spotted unit to 6,000 troops, to 10,000 to 12,000!!!!

Unsurprisingly I've re-evaluated the situation and added a combat team to the assault force to give the Marines a bit of backup, plus hitting the base with 4 B-17 groups out of Gili Gili! I'd send in a Marine division but they're prepped for follow one operations at Shortlands which also 'seems' lightly defended..........


You ain't just whistlin' dixie, bud! Another good point!

_____________________________

"In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard!"-Theodore Roosevelt

(in reply to ctid98)
Post #: 9
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/17/2004 12:39:31 AM   
BraveHome


Posts: 523
Joined: 11/9/2004
From: Tulsa, OK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Beezle

You only want units with big assault factors (Inf, Cav and maybe arty) in the intial wave. Have the others sit 1 hex away until the beach is friendly.


Regarding 'sitting one hex away', the manual (that Mantra of Truth) states only ships unloading in an assault are targets for coastal fire. So (I'm presuming) you can have the other ships in the same hex (guarded by the escorts!) so long as you have the DO NOT UNLOAD option switched on the initial invasion turn.

< Message edited by BraveHome -- 12/16/2004 4:41:46 PM >

(in reply to DrewMatrix)
Post #: 10
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/17/2004 2:08:29 AM   
pompack


Posts: 2582
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: University Park, Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BraveHome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Beezle

You only want units with big assault factors (Inf, Cav and maybe arty) in the intial wave. Have the others sit 1 hex away until the beach is friendly.


Regarding 'sitting one hex away', the manual (that Mantra of Truth) states only ships unloading in an assault are targets for coastal fire. So (I'm presuming) you can have the other ships in the same hex (guarded by the escorts!) so long as you have the DO NOT UNLOAD option switched on the initial invasion turn.

It's been my experience that as long as you have the second echelon set to "follow", it will not unload and doesn't take damage from shore batteries. Switch to destination when the beach is friendly. Only thing to be careful of is if the first echelon finishes unloading before the hex is friendly, the second echelon will just "follow" the first back to base; usually not a problem as long as there are supplies in the first echelon to unload.

(in reply to BraveHome)
Post #: 11
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/22/2004 7:51:42 PM   
BraveHome


Posts: 523
Joined: 11/9/2004
From: Tulsa, OK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pompack


It's been my experience that as long as you have the second echelon set to "follow", it will not unload and doesn't take damage from shore batteries. Switch to destination when the beach is friendly. Only thing to be careful of is if the first echelon finishes unloading before the hex is friendly, the second echelon will just "follow" the first back to base; usually not a problem as long as there are supplies in the first echelon to unload.


Ah! I have not used the 'follow' option much, I will explore its benefits!

(in reply to pompack)
Post #: 12
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/22/2004 8:05:19 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
This is where I get scared ... no matter how much I tell you guys that HQ's are a huge bonus, they still get left at home.

Wake up! Free bonus for that extra ship worth of grunts! Take it!

(in reply to BraveHome)
Post #: 13
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/22/2004 9:20:44 PM   
ckk

 

Posts: 1268
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: Pensacola Beach FL
Status: offline
and don' forget a base force. Aviation rgt. provide av support but base forces bring neat little things like RADAR

(in reply to Cpt.Buckmaster)
Post #: 14
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/22/2004 11:15:32 PM   
RUPD3658


Posts: 6922
Joined: 8/28/2002
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Status: offline
For my initail landing I always use Load troops only. This lets the transports unload faster, epecially under fire. No need to have your transports sunk unloading supplies.

In the second wave I have a base force/avaition reg, engineers, fuel and supply. This is not landed until the beach is secure.

_____________________________

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke


(in reply to ckk)
Post #: 15
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/23/2004 2:07:07 AM   
dtravel


Posts: 4533
Joined: 7/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RUPD3658

For my initail landing I always use Load troops only. This lets the transports unload faster, epecially under fire. No need to have your transports sunk unloading supplies.

In the second wave I have a base force/avaition reg, engineers, fuel and supply. This is not landed until the beach is secure.


Without supplies, don't your troops perform worse?

_____________________________

This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.


(in reply to RUPD3658)
Post #: 16
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/23/2004 3:27:57 AM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dtravel

quote:

ORIGINAL: RUPD3658

For my initail landing I always use Load troops only. This lets the transports unload faster, epecially under fire. No need to have your transports sunk unloading supplies.

In the second wave I have a base force/avaition reg, engineers, fuel and supply. This is not landed until the beach is secure.


Without supplies, don't your troops perform worse?

They sure do. I like to send an AK loaded with supplies in with the first wave. That way beans and boys unload together.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to dtravel)
Post #: 17
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/23/2004 6:41:46 AM   
BraveHome


Posts: 523
Joined: 11/9/2004
From: Tulsa, OK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

This is where I get scared ... no matter how much I tell you guys that HQ's are a huge bonus, they still get left at home.

Wake up! Free bonus for that extra ship worth of grunts! Take it!


Excuse my razor-dull wit, but how did HQs get morphed into this discussion of following?

I agree though, that having HQs in the inital assault is golden, when you can achieve it.

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 18
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/23/2004 7:57:18 AM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RUPD3658

For my initail landing I always use Load troops only. This lets the transports unload faster, epecially under fire. No need to have your transports sunk unloading supplies.

In the second wave I have a base force/avaition reg, engineers, fuel and supply. This is not landed until the beach is secure.



Ship unload speed is not changed at all by having supplies also loaded just so you know.

Having supplies loaded simply means your ships are likely to be docked there a couple of extra turns while they unload slowly. It does not affect troop offload speed one bit.

(in reply to RUPD3658)
Post #: 19
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/23/2004 7:59:35 AM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

Excuse my razor-dull wit, but how did HQs get morphed into this discussion of following?


He was listing his assault force makeup. I noted there is no HQ in it which is a fairly large bonus being thrown away.

Keep in mind that the HQ *ALSO* affects your defence during those critical first turns while you have not unloaded completely and your troops are hurting giving you better odds of not being pushed back into the sea.

(in reply to BraveHome)
Post #: 20
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/23/2004 9:45:11 AM   
BraveHome


Posts: 523
Joined: 11/9/2004
From: Tulsa, OK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

quote:

Excuse my razor-dull wit, but how did HQs get morphed into this discussion of following?


He was listing his assault force makeup. I noted there is no HQ in it which is a fairly large bonus being thrown away.

Keep in mind that the HQ *ALSO* affects your defence during those critical first turns while you have not unloaded completely and your troops are hurting giving you better odds of not being pushed back into the sea.


Whew! I can shave again

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 21
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/23/2004 11:55:20 PM   
Hornblower


Posts: 1361
Joined: 9/10/2003
From: New York'er relocated to Chicago
Status: offline
I agree with the Beezle. i put the supports in a second TF to land following the combat troops, which also brings in the bulk of my supplies

(in reply to DrewMatrix)
Post #: 22
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/24/2004 12:21:57 AM   
BraveHome


Posts: 523
Joined: 11/9/2004
From: Tulsa, OK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

I agree with the Beezle. i put the supports in a second TF to land following the combat troops, which also brings in the bulk of my supplies

To address my original comment, do you keep that secondary force in the same hex with the DO NOT UNLOAD option on, or 60 miles away in a different hex (and if so, why)?

Thanks!

(in reply to Hornblower)
Post #: 23
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/24/2004 1:07:53 AM   
Hornblower


Posts: 1361
Joined: 9/10/2003
From: New York'er relocated to Chicago
Status: offline
BH-

1st, just cuz i say this and it works for me- most of the time- doen't mean its right.. now that being said using Cpt.Buckmaster's TOE as an example i would have the aviation reg and the CB's in the second wave. the combat troops i would try to load a complete regiment in LST's for fast unloading- more if the lst's are available. no use having the support troops banged up by bombardment attacks and the like. the support TF i normally sail a day or two after the assult force if its close enough to the target. If not, then i have it toggled to follow, then when its close to the destination- say a day sailing, then i set it to patrol/do not retire. then i send it in. WHY? it seems to work for me. your idea of DO NOT UNLOAD might work better.

(in reply to BraveHome)
Post #: 24
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/24/2004 6:37:39 AM   
BraveHome


Posts: 523
Joined: 11/9/2004
From: Tulsa, OK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

BH-

1st, just cuz i say this and it works for me- most of the time- doen't mean its right.. now that being said using Cpt.Buckmaster's TOE as an example i would have the aviation reg and the CB's in the second wave. the combat troops i would try to load a complete regiment in LST's for fast unloading- more if the lst's are available. no use having the support troops banged up by bombardment attacks and the like. the support TF i normally sail a day or two after the assult force if its close enough to the target. If not, then i have it toggled to follow, then when its close to the destination- say a day sailing, then i set it to patrol/do not retire. then i send it in. WHY? it seems to work for me. your idea of DO NOT UNLOAD might work better.


Curious, do multiple TFs in the same hex gain from each others AA defenses? If so, that would be one benefit from having the 2nd wave in the same hex as the initial wave....

(in reply to Hornblower)
Post #: 25
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/24/2004 7:09:56 AM   
Hornblower


Posts: 1361
Joined: 9/10/2003
From: New York'er relocated to Chicago
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BraveHome

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

BH-

1st, just cuz i say this and it works for me- most of the time- doen't mean its right.. now that being said using Cpt.Buckmaster's TOE as an example i would have the aviation reg and the CB's in the second wave. the combat troops i would try to load a complete regiment in LST's for fast unloading- more if the lst's are available. no use having the support troops banged up by bombardment attacks and the like. the support TF i normally sail a day or two after the assult force if its close enough to the target. If not, then i have it toggled to follow, then when its close to the destination- say a day sailing, then i set it to patrol/do not retire. then i send it in. WHY? it seems to work for me. your idea of DO NOT UNLOAD might work better.


Curious, do multiple TFs in the same hex gain from each others AA defenses? If so, that would be one benefit from having the 2nd wave in the same hex as the initial wave....


No. TF's if attacked do not gain the AA of another TF.. IF there is cap involved the cap of the hex does.. call me old fashioned but when i go to take a base the CV's go in first, then a bombardment TF, then the CV's then the bombardment TF, then the troops.. and even then the CVE's TF is standing by to provide cap and support.. again this works for me, but there are others who may have a better way of doing it.. Happy Holidays

(in reply to BraveHome)
Post #: 26
RE: Amphib Assault - 12/24/2004 8:21:04 PM   
BraveHome


Posts: 523
Joined: 11/9/2004
From: Tulsa, OK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

No. TF's if attacked do not gain the AA of another TF.. IF there is cap involved the cap of the hex does.. call me old fashioned but when i go to take a base the CV's go in first, then a bombardment TF, then the CV's then the bombardment TF, then the troops.. and even then the CVE's TF is standing by to provide cap and support.. again this works for me, but there are others who may have a better way of doing it.. Happy Holidays


Sounds like a great plan, if you can focus that much force. Since I'm only in day 3 of my 1.0001th PBEM (we started one under 1.3 but only went 2 game weeks before restarted under 1.4) I'm just all spread out with too little support anywhere. But I'm workin' on it!

Happy Holidays to you too!

(in reply to Hornblower)
Post #: 27
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> Amphib Assault Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.907