Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/18/2005 4:57:11 AM   
KG Erwin


Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline
The late-44 SS Panzergrenadiere cost 38 points, and they were armed with the StuG 44, MG 42, Panzerfaust 100, and StHGr 24 hand grenades. The thing is, these units were rare, and too few to make a difference. Now, contrast this with the 1945 USMC F-series squad (36 purchase points): these guys had Garand M1s, 3 BARs, hand grenades, AND a flamethrower. Alternatively, you can buy a squad with satchel charges instead of the flamethrower. Given this, I could still argue that the Marine rifle squad of 1945 posessed more killing power than any other rifle unit of any other country for the entire war. Let me add that the parent regiment had a pool of 43 bazookas, 100 shotguns, and additional heavy/medium MGs which could be parceled out to the battalions/companies/platoons as needed. A given USMC rifle platoon could potentially wield an incredible array of firepower, if it was deemed necessary.

Is there any other rifle squad/platoon in the game that can compare to this, in terms of overall firepower? Do you guys now understand why I'm such a USMC fan?

The Marine Corps: "We're there when a target has to be absolutely & positively destroyed overnight"

Wanna be fascinated? Then look no further.





The photo is of 1st Lt. "Sandy" Bonnyman's assault team on Tarawa--the hill you see is not a hill at all--it is a Japanese bunker. The guy with the satchel charges (not shown) will follow up the flamethrower operator. This is a screen capture from a film sequence.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by KG Erwin -- 4/18/2005 5:41:03 AM >


_____________________________

Post #: 1
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/18/2005 11:00:04 AM   
Dragoon 45


Posts: 435
Joined: 8/10/2004
Status: offline
KG,

One thing I would caution is the reliance on MTOE's. Experienced units accumulated automatic weapons over time, along with other excess equipment. On paper the late war USMC Infantry Squads had probably the most firepower of any infantry squad deployed in the war. But I have seen instances where U.S. Army Squads in NW Europe would be carrying around 2 BAR's, 1 LMG, 1 Bazooka, and numerous satchel charges. It all boiled down to how much the squad leader was willing to let his men carry and how much they were willing to carry. In Europe any U.S. Unit that had been in combat for any extensive period of time acquired sometimes as much as 4 times their official quota of crew-served weapons, i.e. BAR's, MG's, Bazooka's, etc. In a lot of cases the unit would report a weapon destroyed and request a replacement for it, even though it was still in use.

Soldier Load has always been an issue with the infantry. How much a soldier can physically carry and still perform his expected duties is a difficult balancing act. Green Troops will carry non-essential equipment into combat and over time will discard that equipment when they realize they don't need it. Experienced Troops on the other hand have a very good idea what they need to carry, and if not monitored will load themselves down with so much ammo they can hardly move.

I have honestly wondered sometimes how some of those Marine Squads operated with the amount of equipment they were carrying. With a 13 Man Squad; 3 BAR's equates to 9 men (one gunner and two A-gunner/ammo bearers), a flamethrower operator requires at least one other Marine for his protection, Then there is the squad leader normally armed with an SMG or carbine, and finally one squad scout. Only the Scout and Sq Ldr are not weighed down carrying either ammo for the automatic weapons or extra fuel for the flamethrower. If you add in a bazooka or satchel charges I think you get the picture on how much weight these men are carrying in addition to their personal weapon, ammo, and personal gear. Then normally someone has to also carry a radio which in those days was an extreme bitch weighting something around 60-70 lbs. The walkie-talkie that most people associate with WW II was not extensively used by the Marines due to lack of range and the inability to water proof it. The Bar Gunner would carry as many magazine as he could, then there would be at least one or two others carrying extra magazines also. Every body in the squad would also be carrying extra demo, possibly field wire for telephones, field telephones, and a whole lot of other stuff.

I can remember stepping on a scale one time when I was assigned to 2d ANGLICO. Without ammunition, carrying personnel gear, weapon, radio's, and other communications gear I weighed well over 350 lbs. At the time I weighed soaking wet around 180-190. And I was expected to keep up with infantry as that was who I supported with close air and Naval Gunfire. And then in Afghanistan last year I would normally go out on a security patrol carrying around 60lbs of gear for just a few hours walk, 210 rds of ammo, possibly some grenades, weapon, helmet, water normally in a camel back, body armor, elbow and knee pads, radio, bayonet or other large knife, etc. That was my fighting load for just a short patrol. If we were going to stay away from the base camp for any extended period the load went up dramatically, probably another 40-50lbs.


_____________________________

Artillery always has the Right of Way

(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 2
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/18/2005 6:06:35 PM   
omegaall


Posts: 317
Joined: 7/28/2003
Status: offline
KG, as Dragoon 45 said, experienced troops pick up by all sorts of ways extra stuff.

Also in many cases its not the so called available fire power a squad or section has but their ability to use what they have that effectively. this also comes back to the soldiers attitude, command leadership and the current doctrine of the force under consideration.

'Best armed' and 'Best effectively armed' may be in fact two very different things.

(in reply to Dragoon 45)
Post #: 3
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/18/2005 11:12:16 PM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
There is also a difference between best armed of WW2, and best armed in this WW2 game. IIRC, Panzergrenadiers had two MG42 LMG's (not represented in the game ), plus the STG44, then the Pzfausts/shrecks. Also the Gewehr 43, with its semi auto fire and 10 round mag. Two MG42's trump 3 BAR's, and the STG 44 and G43 trump the Garand. The Marine flamethrower trumps the German AT weapon against infantry and caves, but against bunkers or armor; we'll call that one a tie.


Golbin

< Message edited by Goblin -- 4/18/2005 11:14:25 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to omegaall)
Post #: 4
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/19/2005 8:06:12 AM   
Riun T

 

Posts: 1848
Joined: 7/31/2004
Status: offline
I sorta lean toward the russian tank mounted troops of the same period, Molitov's,or rpg-2's Ppsshk mg's and the late model semiauto rifles is a pretty snazy combo. RT

(in reply to Goblin)
Post #: 5
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/19/2005 7:55:25 PM   
Sturmpionier


Posts: 99
Joined: 4/29/2002
From: Jennings, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Goblin

Also the Gewehr 43, with its semi auto fire and 10 round mag.


Golbin


Don't list the G-43 as any kind of 'asset.' I have had two & know several other reenactors w/ one. They fall into the 'poop' category. Sounds good on paper, but in real life...

_____________________________

"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun." - Ash

(in reply to Goblin)
Post #: 6
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/20/2005 12:03:35 AM   
KG Erwin


Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Goblin

There is also a difference between best armed of WW2, and best armed in this WW2 game. IIRC, Panzergrenadiers had two MG42 LMG's (not represented in the game ), plus the STG44, then the Pzfausts/shrecks. Also the Gewehr 43, with its semi auto fire and 10 round mag. Two MG42's trump 3 BAR's, and the STG 44 and G43 trump the Garand. The Marine flamethrower trumps the German AT weapon against infantry and caves, but against bunkers or armor; we'll call that one a tie.


Golbin


Well, Goblin, I WAS talking about the best (or most effectively)-armed infantry in SPWAW terms--at least we have some relative values to compare.

I suppose I need to set up a "king of the hill" series of playoffs so I can test my theory. Open field, no support weapons--rifle platoon vs rifle platoon.

You obviously want an SS Panzergrenadier vs F-series USMC matchup, but who else to join the playoffs? Riun wants the Russian Tankodesantniki to take part. I'd put in a vote for the 1944 Brit Airborne, the guys with the Sten Mk2's, the Bren LMG, the Gammon bombs and the 2 in mortar--these guys sound VERY tough. What do we call this--"Showdown at the SPWaW Corral", maybe?

Sounds like fun.


< Message edited by KG Erwin -- 4/20/2005 12:18:15 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Goblin)
Post #: 7
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/20/2005 1:13:44 AM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KG Erwin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Goblin

There is also a difference between best armed of WW2, and best armed in this WW2 game. IIRC, Panzergrenadiers had two MG42 LMG's (not represented in the game ), plus the STG44, then the Pzfausts/shrecks. Also the Gewehr 43, with its semi auto fire and 10 round mag. Two MG42's trump 3 BAR's, and the STG 44 and G43 trump the Garand. The Marine flamethrower trumps the German AT weapon against infantry and caves, but against bunkers or armor; we'll call that one a tie.


Golbin


Well, Goblin, I WAS talking about the best (or most effectively)-armed infantry in SPWAW terms--at least we have some relative values to compare.

I suppose I need to set up a "king of the hill" series of playoffs so I can test my theory. Open field, no support weapons--rifle platoon vs rifle platoon.

You obviously want an SS Panzergrenadier vs F-series USMC matchup, but who else to join the playoffs? Riun wants the Russian Tankodesantniki to take part. I'd put in a vote for the 1944 Brit Airborne, the guys with the Sten Mk2's, the Bren LMG, the Gammon bombs and the 2 in mortar--these guys sound VERY tough. What do we call this--"Showdown at the SPWaW Corral", maybe?

Sounds like fun.



It would be fun if they were outfitted properly (i.e two MG42 LMG's). Also, who decides the range? The Marines effectively lose their fourth weapon if they are not next to their enemy. You are right about the Brit Paras! I am using them in Normandy Gold, and that 2 inch mortar kicks butt!


Goblin


_____________________________


(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 8
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/20/2005 2:21:21 AM   
KG Erwin


Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline
Ok, Goblin, what you're saying is that the weapons list should have an MG42x2? The SS Grenadiere platoon of 1944 does have a MG 42 MMG attached to it. No country has a LMG with a x2 for its weapons list, does it? I've seen this for some small arms (BAR x 3, for example). What are you suggesting?

The '44 SS Motorized Platoon already has two MG42s assigned to it, in addition to the LMGs assigned within the squads. This is one of those "averaging" out OOB decisions that had to be made, given the limitations of available slots.

Unfortunately, getting the Germans absolutely historically correct in SPWaW for the entire war is just impossible. There aren't enough slots available.

There IS an alternative, but it would be constructed under the assumption you're starting a 1939 long campaign. This would remove all the post-39 formations, but keep all of the units for upgrade purposes. A few people might want to do that, but not enough to warrant a complete reworking of the OOB. However, the existing formations as of Sept 1, 1939, could be fit into this. I reworked my personal German OOB with this thought in mind.


_____________________________


(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 9
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/20/2005 2:41:43 AM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
Panzergrenadiers had one squad MG42, and one that was dismounted from the halftrack for ground fighting. They used both MG's when dismounted. I dunno how it could be modeled, but it sucks that only certain weapons were given the x2 and x3 designations.


Goblin

_____________________________


(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 10
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/20/2005 7:59:36 AM   
Riun T

 

Posts: 1848
Joined: 7/31/2004
Status: offline
Hey Gunny U've got your work cut out for yourself on this one, just looking again at the Encyclopedia,we could also include the Brit, Canadian, and Assie SMG squads or full assault squads. Even the Indian assault squad has some punch. I think u should test with both parties starting from a barn or farmhouse and make the objectives each others start across a summerfollow field say 450yrds there for giving each platoon the same distance to cross with the same tactical terrain = same # of turns/time. And if u made each of the platoons hold the house or barn for a few turns after they took it then u'd get to see eaches performance of firepower in assault and defend, I feel from my real time in the forces that for all the gripe that old goblin is giving about the MG 42's that we'd all get to see if they where as much of a firepower asset after covering that 450 yds and if they could get to the firingline quicker than say the american 30cal LMG???. Last minute thought make them both have to climb a hill between em? RT

(in reply to Goblin)
Post #: 11
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/20/2005 2:13:57 PM   
Warrior2


Posts: 237
Joined: 6/25/2001
From: West Palm Beach, FL USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KG Erwin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Goblin

There is also a difference between best armed of WW2, and best armed in this WW2 game. IIRC, Panzergrenadiers had two MG42 LMG's (not represented in the game ), plus the STG44, then the Pzfausts/shrecks. Also the Gewehr 43, with its semi auto fire and 10 round mag. Two MG42's trump 3 BAR's, and the STG 44 and G43 trump the Garand. The Marine flamethrower trumps the German AT weapon against infantry and caves, but against bunkers or armor; we'll call that one a tie.


Golbin


Well, Goblin, I WAS talking about the best (or most effectively)-armed infantry in SPWAW terms--at least we have some relative values to compare.

I suppose I need to set up a "king of the hill" series of playoffs so I can test my theory. Open field, no support weapons--rifle platoon vs rifle platoon.

You obviously want an SS Panzergrenadier vs F-series USMC matchup, but who else to join the playoffs? Riun wants the Russian Tankodesantniki to take part. I'd put in a vote for the 1944 Brit Airborne, the guys with the Sten Mk2's, the Bren LMG, the Gammon bombs and the 2 in mortar--these guys sound VERY tough. What do we call this--"Showdown at the SPWaW Corral", maybe?

Sounds like fun.



Thanks for an idea for a scenario: Marines vs SS!


_____________________________



(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 12
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/20/2005 10:04:24 PM   
VikingNo2


Posts: 2918
Joined: 1/26/2002
From: NC
Status: offline
How about the 20 man Jap squad with the 50mm mortar in it. 20 Japanese fire rifles and light mgs then a mortar can be very effective

(in reply to Warrior2)
Post #: 13
RE: The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII - 4/21/2005 12:09:06 AM   
KG Erwin


Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VikingNo2

How about the 20 man Jap squad with the 50mm mortar in it. 20 Japanese fire rifles and light mgs then a mortar can be very effective


Oh, yeah, Viking, I do indeed know about these guys--apart from the volume of fire they produce, I always cringe when I hear the dreaded "Banzai!".


_____________________________


(in reply to VikingNo2)
Post #: 14
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> The Best-Armed Infantry of WWII Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.750