Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Smackdown!!!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Smackdown!!! Page: <<   < prev  30 31 [32] 33 34   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/16/2005 3:38:07 PM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		Is this what full allied control looks like? Was I too late this turn (the turn after your CAs got smacked by aircraft I mop up what is left???). Rabaul???? You haven't dented it yet!

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 11/28/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Admiralty Islands at 58,84

Japanese Ships
BB Kongo
BB Yamato
CA Myoko
CA Nachi
DD Shiranuhi
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Tanikaze
DD Asashio
DD Asagumo
DD Yamakaze
DD Kawakaze
DD Umikaze
DD Hatsushima
DD Wakaba
DD Ariake
DD Shinonome
DD Shirayuki
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Murakumo
DD Shikinami
DD Ayanami
DD Yuzuki
DD Fuyo
DD Sagi
DD Kari

Allied Ships
PT PT-118, Shell hits 15, and is sunk
PT PT-122, Shell hits 14, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Admiralty Islands at 58,84

Japanese Ships
BB Kongo
BB Yamato
CA Myoko
CA Nachi
DD Shiranuhi
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Tanikaze
DD Asashio
DD Asagumo
DD Yamakaze
DD Kawakaze
DD Umikaze
DD Hatsushima
DD Wakaba
DD Ariake
DD Shinonome
DD Shirayuki
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Murakumo
DD Shikinami
DD Ayanami
DD Yuzuki
DD Fuyo
DD Sagi
DD Kari

Allied Ships
PT PT-73, Shell hits 9, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Admiralty Islands at 58,84

Japanese Ships
BB Kongo, Shell hits 3
BB Yamato, Shell hits 1
CA Myoko, Shell hits 10
CA Nachi, Shell hits 7
DD Shiranuhi, Shell hits 1
DD Tokitsukaze, Shell hits 2
DD Tanikaze
DD Asashio
DD Asagumo
DD Yamakaze
DD Kawakaze
DD Umikaze
DD Hatsushima
DD Wakaba
DD Ariake
DD Shinonome
DD Shirayuki
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Murakumo, Shell hits 1
DD Shikinami
DD Ayanami, Shell hits 1
DD Yuzuki
DD Fuyo
DD Sagi
DD Kari

Allied Ships
CL Concord, Shell hits 12, on fire, heavy damage sunk
DD Balch, Shell hits 39, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD John D. Ford, Shell hits 4, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Ward, Shell hits 18, on fire, heavy damage sunk 1 18 inch shell it did it.
DD Le Triomphant, Shell hits 18, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DD Nestor, Shell hits 4, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DD Nizam, Shell hits 6, on fire

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88


Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 160


Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 16 damaged

Japanese Ships
AP Husimi Maru, Bomb hits 13, on fire, heavy damage

Japanese ground losses:
196 casualties reported
Guns lost 3

Port hits 7
Port fuel hits 4
Port supply hits 3

Aircraft Attacking:
16 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
12 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
22 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
29 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
16 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
18 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
10 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
7 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet


_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 931
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/17/2005 4:56:04 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Well I got some good hits in on the Myoko.....I bet she is running strait back to Japan. Truth be known this Jap TF came out of no where. It slipped my search a/c and I was caught out as a result.

But OTOH the first naval bombardment of Rabal went off without a hitch. Ten DMS in the TF ensured that no ship hit any mines, and the months of attacks from the air set to port attack also made sure that his coastal guns were of little use.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 11/29/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Rangoon , at 29,34

Japanese aircraft
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 27

Allied aircraft
Swordfish x 9

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Swordfish: 1 destroyed, 5 damaged

Port hits 1

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x Swordfish bombing at 5000 feet
5 x Swordfish bombing at 5000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Rabaul, at 61,88

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
H8K Emily: 1 destroyed
E13A1 Jake: 3 destroyed

Allied Ships
CL Honolulu
CL Nashville
CL Phoenix
CL St. Louis
CL Detroit
CL Raleigh
CA Vincennes
CA Minneapolis
CA New Orleans
CA Louisville
CA Portland
BB North Carolina
BB Mississippi
BB Idaho

Japanese ground losses:
7639 casualties reported
Guns lost 60

Airbase hits 22
Airbase supply hits 10
Runway hits 153
Port hits 4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 14th Tank Regiment, at 35,28


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 10
Wellington III x 80
Hudson I x 12
Beaufort V-IX x 31
P-40E Warhawk x 52
B-25C Mitchell x 163
B-24D Liberator x 39


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
557 casualties reported
Vehicles lost 33

Aircraft Attacking:
4 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
5 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
4 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
6 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
9 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet
4 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
6 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
15 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
20 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
15 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
27 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
6 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
4 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
4 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
6 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
20 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
18 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
27 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
5 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
8 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
8 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
14 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
12 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
4 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet


_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 932
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/17/2005 10:18:21 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline 		If Raver's Rabaul bombardment TF meets Luskan's Surface Combat TF, things could get pretty exciting!

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 933
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/18/2005 11:49:13 AM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		BB vs BB won't work - is too fair a fight. I'd prefer Tanaka and 10 dds surprising that BB tf - and long lancing them at night.

_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 934
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/20/2005 3:52:13 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		In yer dreams ratbrain.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 935
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/20/2005 10:09:16 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline 		I have to agree with Raver: by the end of November 1942, a fair number of USN warships were equipped not merely with radar, but good radar. And the modern American 6-inch cruisers ("light cruisers" in name only) can eat destroyers for breakfast. (Check the number of shells per minute they could pump out.)

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 936
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/21/2005 6:16:38 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Also the experiance level of my ships crews grows by the day which is also a factor in countering the IJN night attack tactic.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 937
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/21/2005 9:23:05 AM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		Did he just quote that his night experience grows by the day? *sigh*

Well, if I have accomplished one thing so far in the game, it has been to crush the AVG. They really aren't a threat any more. Most of my other allied opponents loose them on the ground for good (sitting at mandalay when jap troops take the place).

I've been running an ocean search op deep behind enemy lines with a CS ship. Turned up diddly in 3 turns of waiting around. Seems Raver's shipping routes aren't where I expected them to be.

_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 938
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/29/2005 9:34:41 AM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		Well, a lot has happened in the last week adn we've both been too busy to post. In fact at the moment Raver is too busy to do turns . . . . I've been there and hated it.

Anyhow - a quick summary for the home viewers!

1. I pulled of a pair of mid ocean intercepts off Akyab with my CA/DD forces pounding 5 or 6 allied transports under. Raver on the other hand met 5 of my dds at Akyab with 4 RN BBs and 21 supporting warships. Wasn't pretty.

2. I lost several transports around Rabaul as Raver's dauntlesses now fly out of the little base next to shortlands . . . forget the name. Torokina probably. Rabaul is continually supplied.

3. My troops in Burma have advanced to myitkina and Raver's bombers are struggling to pound my troops senseless before they can attack. It worked when I was using just 1 arm unit for the assault but I'm going to bring up real firepower and end it properly.

4. I sank a few subs.

5. I swapped over lots of garrisons this turn - replacing older, more experienced but more fatigued troops with younger fresher troops at many front line bases.



_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 939
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/30/2005 12:45:40 AM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

Raver on the other hand met 5 of my dds at Akyab with 4 RN BBs and 21 supporting warships. Wasn't pretty.


Hmmm... Wasn't that the kind of action you were hoping for? Oh yes, you wanted twice as many destroyers, and Tanaka in command. Were there any Long Lance hits?

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 940
RE: Smackdown!!! - 5/30/2005 3:16:13 PM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		Not even a launch. Tanaka was off on the other side of the world at that point. I wanted 3 times as many destroyers and I wanted to catch him with his pants down.

Win some loose some.

_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 941
RE: Smackdown!!! - 6/1/2005 2:27:05 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Luskan has lost a ****load of DDs so many infact that he is now running BBs without ANY DD escorts. Just sent in CV TF to pound Rabal. Lost of action is soon to come as I start to probe his outer defensive ring.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 942
RE: Smackdown!!! - 6/2/2005 12:30:12 PM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		bbs without dds? eh? where????

_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 943
A view from the top - 6/4/2005 12:37:18 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Given that we both started this game while it was in beta, it is fair to say that we have both made some large mistakes that we have avoided in later games.

My main problem is that I have lost too many fighting ships to stupid acts...and Luskan is one hell of a player who never lets you get away with a mistake. These stupid acts have main come from a desire to hit back as it can be a very frustrating 12 months as the allied player.

The next big problem for me, and this is all my own fault, is that I have engineering units spread from arsehole to breakfast as "part" units. And it is taking one hell of an effort to try and reform these units. It is also hampering my ability to to support my airfarce in the SWPAC.

Luskan sent me an email that I thought would be good for all you jap players to read. I hope he does not mind me posting this online.


"So many things I would do differently if we were playing over.

I'd expand my industry slower - and I'd aim more long term for plane production instead of a6m2, val, kate and betty only (instead of later models).

Obviously I'd rearrange my target priority for my shock and awe first week a little.

I wouldn't ignore the solomons as long as I did etc. Can't see myself committing to take the place while there are still lots of resource providing places in Java - but now I'm much better aquainted with invasions of Java/defence of Java - the allied OOB at the start of the game through to feb etc. I'm confident no one could hold it against me (my subsequent WITP games have benefited GREATLY from this one.

I've only got 1 other game still going - because Oliver Heindorf is the only allied opponent who hasn't lost all his cvs to me early, then followed up by getting bitch slapped in the classic "Allies go on the offensive WAYWAY too early."

e.g. someone tried to invade Kwajalein. The CD units and betties killed the american inf units (marine division included) which should have been protecting Hawaii etc.

One genius tried to snatch Truk with a fast transport group (eh???)

More than half the allied CVs in my other 4 witp games were sunk by my land based aircraft when the allied player got silly. Attaking Major jap airbases in early 42 . . . . going to get you sunk every time.

Most allied opponents (you and Oliver excluded) can't play China or Burma. I eat China alive in a totally ahistorical romp because the chinese army tries to stand and fight early on - up front with long supply lines (same in burma). They loose so bad I take the whole map up to India.

Don't have a counter for your conservation strategy in China. I would take Akyab earlier however - and leave it as a lightly defended forward outpost to absorb some of your level bomber's range."


Well now I am well on the way to Japan, and it will be here that I start to make the really big mistakes, how bad those mistakes are will depend upon how well Luskan is able to exploit them.





_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 944
RE: A view from the top - 6/5/2005 11:27:48 AM   
Oliver Heindorf


Posts: 1911
Joined: 5/1/2002
From: Hamburg/Deutschland
Status: offline 		once Luskan get the idea of your playing style, you are doomed.
first 3 months went ok with me ( excluding burma, where I sucked and he had a little bit luck destroying lots of units instead that my just ran away (retreating ) ) but now he is kicking my butt around the globe. Well, I stop complaining becasue it leads to nowhere anyway.

I find it intresting that your game started in beta status and it is still running fine and reliable. :)

I followed this AAR from 1 year ago and I still cant stop reading it, gr8 job!

_____________________________


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 945
RE: A view from the top - 6/7/2005 4:08:34 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Oliver Heindorf

once Luskan get the idea of your playing style, you are doomed.
first 3 months went ok with me ( excluding burma, where I sucked and he had a little bit luck destroying lots of units instead that my just ran away (retreating ) ) but now he is kicking my butt around the globe. Well, I stop complaining becasue it leads to nowhere anyway.

I find it intresting that your game started in beta status and it is still running fine and reliable. :)

I followed this AAR from 1 year ago and I still cant stop reading it, gr8 job!



Oliver,

mate if it is any consolation you have been "beaten" by what I consider one of the best IJN players on this forum. He is a real gun player who will whip you at every chance that he gets. Just so long as you keep your CVs floating you should still have a chance.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Oliver Heindorf)
Post #: 946
RE: A view from the top - 6/7/2005 10:51:35 PM   
Oliver Heindorf


Posts: 1911
Joined: 5/1/2002
From: Hamburg/Deutschland
Status: offline 		hehe, no need for a consolation yet, I am still up and running fine :) ( hopefully )
as long as I have ideas and surprises for him ready, I feel OK. The feedback I got from him supports me in this matter I will never forget my raids on his solomon islands invasions fleets BOOM !



_____________________________


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 947
RE: A view from the top - 6/8/2005 2:47:22 PM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		It's easy to be better than your opponent when I've been playing the game 2 years and they've only been playing 5 months!

Although I can play the japs pretty well now, the lessons i've learnt playing them make me a very boring allied opponent - I'd sit on my ass all game and hide until late 44 when I can't be stopped.

Interesting to note that Oli's strategy in China is so effective - he hasn't tried to defend the whole chinese line - just 1.5 points on it. I KNOW I could take the weaker bases and avoid his massive buildups, but the problem is I'm not sure who would be flanking who! I've stolen Burma however and soon the lack of supplies will lead to a chinese crumbling. Still ahven't got Manila or Singapore yet (fighting in earnest).

Here is my last turn vs Raver - the turn before he sent three lone MSWs up near the Admiralty islands. I think he was going to use them to start paring away at the minefield that is Rabaul. Fortunately for me my betties proved just how elite they were. 12 betties, 3 groups of 4, three hits, three sunk msws.

Then this turn I caught a small transport TF in the lower indonesian chains. Raver is trying to staff/build some smaller airbases there to extend his air umbrella to the point it can threaten Kendari. kendari is safe - but there are lots of smaller bases around the place that I haven't finished building (and I haven't got enough CD units to protect them all). Those narrow waters are going to become a surface combat battleground in months to come, so I've made sure many major fleet units are refitted prior to the beginning of the nastiness.

My Rangoon fleet is back to full compliment as my last Singapore/Rangoon rotation has completed (damaged ships to singers for repairs).

Enjoy.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/20/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Lautem at 33,78

Japanese Ships
CA Kako
CL Yura, Shell hits 1
CL Kinu
DD Arashi
DD Hagikaze
DD Natsugumo, Shell hits 1
DD Minegumo
DD Samidare
DD Suzukaze
DD Akatsuki
DD Hibiki

Allied Ships
AK Santa Teresa, Shell hits 2
AK Empire Lake, Shell hits 14, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
AK Høegh Merchant, Shell hits 1, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
AK Mabella, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88


Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 6


Allied aircraft losses
B-25C Mitchell: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
26 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 3
Runway hits 2

Aircraft Attacking:
4 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
2 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 4th Mixed Regiment, at 36,28


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 12
Wellington III x 89
Hudson I x 9
B-25C Mitchell x 138
B-24D Liberator x 36


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
236 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
6 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
18 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
20 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
13 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
24 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
4 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
18 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
15 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
9 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
6 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
7 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
4 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
9 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Hudson I bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
2 x Wellington III bombing at 6000 feet
5 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
4 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet
3 x B-24D Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 42nd Naval Guard Unit, at 58,84


Allied aircraft
Beaufort V-IX x 32


No Allied losses

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
11 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
6 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
6 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Beaufort V-IX bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 47,46

Japanese Ships
PC Ch 9
PC Ch 8
PC Showa Maru #5
PC Showa Maru #3
PC Shonan Maru #7
PC Shonan Maru #6
PC Sonan Maru #6
PC Gamitsu Maru #1
PG Zuiko Maru
PG Saiko Maru
PG Magan Maru
PG Koei Maru
PG Keijo Maru
PG Edo Maru
PG Chosa Maru
PG Hashidate
MSW Tama Maru #2
MSW Ranzan Maru
MSW Fukeui Maru #7
MSW Atsu Maru
MSW Asahi Maru
MSW Wa 2
MSW Wa 1

Allied Ships
SS Sailfish


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Myitkyina

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 10786 troops, 124 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 23401 troops, 88 guns, 179 vehicles


Japanese ground losses:
32 casualties reported


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Admiralty Islands

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 17407 troops, 160 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 252 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 710 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
754 casualties reported
Guns lost 4







_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Oliver Heindorf)
Post #: 948
RE: A view from the top - 6/11/2005 6:17:50 AM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		Some important things have happened in the last week or so of turns. Firstly, Rabaul has started to come undone on me. I am no longer confident that I can get supplies and troops in and damaged units out. Raver's air power really is awesome down in that area of town.

In mnore important news I have finally finished my fast track research into the Oscar 2A. Why is this important? Because I am now producing hundreds of them per month, and all those NATE pilots who have had NOTHING TO DO (I didn't put them into combat once) except train, train train and do more training, are now finally getting decent planes. Fairly soon my 700+ Nate pilots will be 700+ oscar pilots. I don't think I have a nate squadron with an average exp of less than 85!!!!!!!! This is a MUST strategy for any jap player. I'm hoping that these 700 pilots will take over all sorts of defence duties that their elite naval fighter comrades have been covering.

With the exception of those pilots lost aboardmy underwater cvs, my naval air wing is intact - and has had a bit of retraining on its own. Time for some live targets again (before Raver can match my deck space with uber allied fighters).

Suplies are plentiful, resource and oil stockpiles are the largest they've ever been - all my industry expansions are finished and I think everything really worth waiting for is out of the pipeline and is on the map. I cannot improve on the total (thanks churchy!).



_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 949
Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/12/2005 7:47:30 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Well here are a few of the current plans and operations that are currently under way. Both are fairly straitforward with little need to explain. In the DEI operations I will be using the successful tactic that was used against Rabal: Shut it down, surround and isolate, then by-pass.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Raverdave -- 6/12/2005 8:09:07 AM >

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 950
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/12/2005 7:50:32 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		DEI Operations




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Raverdave -- 6/12/2005 8:10:03 AM >

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 951
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/12/2005 8:13:10 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Hmmmmm....sumfink is wrong with the pic file.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 952
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/12/2005 8:16:25 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Ok take two..............




Attachment (1)

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 953
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/12/2005 8:19:37 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Cool That worked......now for the second file




Attachment (1)

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 954
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/12/2005 11:26:58 AM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		enough with the yawn fest of pics and send me a turn already!


_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 955
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/13/2005 7:49:20 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		I'm the one waiting for the turn !!!!!!!!

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 956
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/13/2005 1:24:18 PM   
Oliver Heindorf


Posts: 1911
Joined: 5/1/2002
From: Hamburg/Deutschland
Status: offline 		enough talking guys, keep it on !!



_____________________________


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 957
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/13/2005 10:20:26 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline 		You have to admire Raver -- not only is he willing to announce his move ahead of time, he gives us diagrams. Of course, this is from the man who kept boasting about how heavily defended Java was. . .

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Oliver Heindorf)
Post #: 958
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/14/2005 12:54:28 PM   
Luskan

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 7/11/2002
From: Down Under
Status: offline 		Diagrams????????? All he does is post a pick with a big pink or beige arrow pointing towards every base on the map?

A couple of quiet turns have passed. Not willing to divulge too much at the moment. Things are afoot.


_____________________________

With dancing Bananas and Storm Troopers who needs BBs?

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 959
RE: Future plans and operations in the SWPAC AO - 6/15/2005 3:18:47 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		*Sniff* At least I am brave enough to telegraph MY next move, unlike the cowardly yellow banananananana. And as for Capt. Harlot...er Harlock well my Java plan DID work didn't it ?

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Luskan)
Post #: 960
Page:   <<   < prev  30 31 [32] 33 34   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Smackdown!!! Page: <<   < prev  30 31 [32] 33 34   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.188