Erik Rutins
Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000 From: Vermont, USA Status: offline
|
NeverMan, quote:
ORIGINAL: NeverMan What trend is that? Giving a release date then not meeting it, then giving another release date, then not meeting it, then giving another release date, then not meeting it, then giving another release date, then not meeting it, then giving another release date, then not meeting it, etc, etc, etc.... Yeah, I tend to agree. Why would I buy, or even consider looking at, any of Matrix Games' other games when this game as been so problematic for them? They only have 1 guy on this game, that's absurd. Hats off to Ellis but he should seek out a real company that might actually give him some support and back up what they say, unlike Matrix. You've made a few assumptions: 1. That only one person has ever worked on this project (though Marshall certainly has the Lion's Share) 2. That a project with a small team that changes from a separate game to a EiA adaptation is easy to set a schedule on 3. That there are a lot of other "real" companies out there with an interest in a turn-based EiA adaptation that would do it "right". 4. That the fact that we've released over thirty games in the past five years is irrelevant compared to a few that have been delayed. We are committed to seeing this through and releasing Empires In Arms for the computer. Regards, - Erik
_____________________________
|