Charles2222
Posts: 3993
Joined: 3/12/2001 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Zap Granted she did'nt cooperate but she could have been easily handled by those young officers, without the use of the tazer. He was trigger happy. Similar example of trigger happy cops. In Compton, Ca. 14 officers fired 120 bullets into a moving car. Wounded the driver;(lucky for the driver they were bad shots) turns out he was not the suspect they were looking for. It seems to me their temprament is like the gung ho cop. Being young, they may not be long out of the police academy. I've seen other police in action who would have been more patient than these two. Granted there were two officers, but from what I heard one cop say, often the woman is the last person you want to take into custody, because when they get to fighting, they often don't reach a point where they will give up like a man, but fights as though it's to the death. She may be an uppity smart-aleck, but whether that's true or not, from what I seen, it looks as though not only the speeding might have been caused by the cellphone, but that her refusal to get out had in large portion to do with her attention being divided by it (IOW I don't think she understood everything he said and of course the person on the other end of the line was probably talking). She would rather talk to her audience than comply. Did anyone hear her joke that he was going to shoot her? I would agree that the chances of doing damage to her were a lot greater if they had forceably pulled her out. What's more if they pulled her out it would look a lot more like police brutality. Sure getting tazed could be brutality too, but it's a lot easier to conceal. I don't think the fact that she had the attitude that her cellphone was more important then a policeman seriously wanting her to comply, exactly made him any less aggresive. She probably thought she was invincible from them doing anything to her, apart from a ticket, simply because she had an ear-witness so to speak.
|