Hertston
Posts: 3564
Joined: 8/17/2002 From: Cornwall, UK Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ARMCHGNL Thanks for the suggestions everyone. World at War or FPG? Which one would you recommend for a beginner? Both are "easy to learn, hard to master" as they say. They are very different types of game though, so I'd base your decision on what you want to play rather than how complex or otherwise it is. FPG is a "pure" wargame, WaW isn't a "wargame" at all as I would define that term; its a turn-based strategy game based on WW2. The former involves a simulation (at a relatively simple level) of the actual decisions of, and tactics used by, a brigade/regimental commander in the real world. WaW, while simple to learn is a deep strategy game but it doesn't even attempt to "simulate" anything. Sure, more and better tanks is good as in the real world, but to play WaW well you need to "master" its own gameplay not real-world grand strategy! If you don't really know what you want, I'd plump for WaW of those two as its hard to imagine any reasonably intelligent gamer not enjoying it. FPG, though, is a better introduction to wargames proper, and will stand you in good stead if you move on to other titles of that type, like the Decisive Battles of WW2 series. Whatever you do, download and play about with Steel Panthers: World at War. The basic version (there is a pay-for version with several "mega-campaigns" as well) is FREE, and while a different style of game from FPG, it will give you a good idea of whether you will like wargames or not. P.S. Not one of your choices I know, but if I personally was recommending one game only from the Matrix stable for a "beginner", it would be Tin Soldiers: Julius Caesar.
< Message edited by Hertston -- 6/12/2005 1:02:19 AM >
|