ravinhood
Posts: 3891
Joined: 10/23/2003 Status: offline
|
quote:
You've totally lost me here. I can't comprehend why a new avenue of sale can lower the overall sale of a product. Did the sale of movies drop when DVD's came about? Did everyone have a dvd player? Did that gradually change over time as more people realized that the DVD was a better way to enjoy a movie? Did the customer benefit from having more than one way of buying a movie? Did the movie market lose sales because of dvd's? A DVD player is highly cheaper than a computer, so you can't even compare apples to oranges with DVD players and their products. But, since you did, DVD products are where? At RETAIL OUTLETS, most common form of selling them and renting them, not "direct download" or "direct sales". So, even in your example you have shown "retail" sales outdo online/direct sales and get more exposure. Sales of software in "amount" in direct sales vs amount in retail sales will go down, it already has. Matrixgames doesn't get the "EXPOSURE" from direct download like it does in retail sales on a shelf where many will see their product that may not even have a connection to the internet. Your philosophy is because you buy product this way means "everyone" will buy product this way, and while "some (a few) will buy product by direct download or direct sales, the majority of people still buy product retail and still prefer it, it just won't happen or take off in the near future, the trust in the internet just isn't there yet and your majority of consumers don't even use the internet or have computers to buy direct download. Also, it lowers the population of newcomers to the genre, the 12 year old may never even see a matrixgame title that is interested in wargames, thus, they will use another avenue and probably be led down the route of RTS wargames which are all over software "retail outlets". People tend to buy what they can SEE, not what they happen to come by by accident like finding the Matrixgames website. In fact I didn't even know about Matrixgames until 2 years ago and I've been on the internet since 1995 and wargaming since 1968, so, that shows you right there, they just don't get EXPOSURE except by accident or word of mouth, which is very slim. So, while you may be getting what "you" want out of Matrixgames and direct download, many others are not, thus, the population will decrease, the number of sales vs retail sales will decrease, but, their profits will increase. This is my point, the idea is correct, but, at a cost of new wargamers and many consumers never ever seeing or hearing about their products. Thus, your own happiness may be deminished or even out of business because of lack of EXPOSURE and lack of "GROWTH" in the genre, because of that lack of EXPOSURE. A company survives not only by profit margin, but, also by "GROWTH & EXPOSURE", you're regular costomers may come and go, without increased growth, the bottom dollar starts to bottom out. Not to mention inflation, cost of goods, increased needs of income by the developers and publishers pushing these direct download prices up, while retail software remains reletively the same in price or even lower with bargain bin savings for the consumer that might like the product and buy the next product at retail. EA, Activision, Microsoft, Atari, you don't see them running to direct download, AND hiding out from the retail sales. They realize they need growth & exposure to continue to maintain profits in the "future". They use an avenue of BOTH, either direct purchase AND retail sales. You may be a happy camper now, 5 to 10 years from now you may be wondering where Matrixgames went. In my 25 years of computer gaming I've seen a lot of publishers and developers come and go, only the mainstream publishers still remain for the most part. A lot of these guys now with Matrixgames used to be affliated with SSI, and you know what happened to them. Also reading stories like this don't bode well for the internet market as a secure means of buying product. http://gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=9916
< Message edited by ravinhood -- 7/5/2005 7:37:43 PM >
|