Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

PBYs

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> PBYs Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
PBYs - 7/13/2005 7:02:34 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline
To all of you who know more than I do out there (I'm sure that's most of you):
I am bedeviled by what seems to me poor performance on my PBY squadrons.

I have played a few PBEM games ('42 scenarios as allied) and a disturbing trend has become apparent to me;
I have my PBYs at the usual bases all over the Pacific flying air search - first at 15,000 feet, then I've been trying 6,000 feet. The result has been that they spot occasional subs, but have never spotted a Jap TF until the TF attacks me, and is four hexes away from it's target (me).

What am I doing wrong here? I mean, I am supposed to be able to spot the enemy before he gets me aren't I? Once in a while?
Post #: 1
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 7:16:05 PM   
CapAndGown


Posts: 3206
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Virginia, USA
Status: offline
Its that diabolical Japanese Stealth techonology.

(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 2
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 7:19:05 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cap_and_gown

Its that diabolical Japanese Stealth techonology.

I'm sayin'!

(in reply to CapAndGown)
Post #: 3
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 7:38:53 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
No more AWACS search.

So solly.

_____________________________


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 4
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 7:42:04 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

No more AWACS search.

So solly.

Darn!

But seriously folks, is my experiance here typical - in that the allies never spot a TF till after it hit's...or am I just lucky?

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 5
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 7:49:09 PM   
Bradley7735


Posts: 2073
Joined: 7/12/2004
Status: offline
I don't seem to have a problem spotting task forces.

I tend to put a squadron at each front line base all across my front. Even if the bases are close. I'd rather have a squadron at Lunga AND Tulagi, instead of Lunga and Luganville, for example. 6,000 feet, 60% naval search, out to max range.

I don't know if I spot every TF that comes around, but I spot enough to know where KB usually is.

I play the AI, though.

_____________________________

The older I get, the better I was.

(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 6
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 7:49:43 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
sounds like your just lucky, or facing a crafty player (like me) who knows how to avoid snoopers.



_____________________________


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 7
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 8:02:39 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
For dedicated search planes (and PB4Y's), 100% naval search. For bombers that might be searching, whatever percent keeps the fatigue and morale managable. All at 6,000 ft.

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 8
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 8:04:15 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

sounds like your just lucky, or facing a crafty player (like me) who knows how to avoid snoopers.



Yah, he's crafty...we've been opponents for over 25 years!

However, his TFs ALWAYS appear exactly four hexes out and only after they hit me...and I'm not talking about appearing suddenly in front of Midway, or Wake, I mean appearing there and BEHIND Pearl Harbor only 4 hexes out - so he would have had to steam through 2,000+ miles of search area to appear there - not just an overnight full speed dash from PBY extreme range.

So I wondered if anyone else out there has this happen to them religiously, or is it a matter of the allies not being worth anything till 1944 or what?

Signed, exasperated.

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 9
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 8:27:32 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
The problem with PBYs and PBEM is that the "sprint range" (full speed) of KB, is 10 hexes for one day. So an opponent will sit at the edge of your range (12 hexes I think), and then run it at full speed the next turn to clobber you. Or if using Shok/Zui/Hiry/Sory (all speed 30+ kts), sprint range is 12 (Kaga and Akagi will slow the group to under 30 kts, so range is only 10). Once KB has some sys damage, you have less to worry for the 12 sprint range (because the sys dmg will bring them under 30 kts, and thus to sprint of 10).

But at ranges of greater than 8, your PBYs will not be nearly as likely spot (or accurate if they do).

Your one blessed sqdn of Coronados are wonderful. Keep them alive. They have a range of like 12/14 vs. the 10/12 of PBYs.

Playing 2-day turns, you’re completely screwed, because sprint range for KB is 20 hexes (a LONG way).

Unfortunately for you as Allies, the Emily/Mavis/Nell/Betty range will detect you fairly early on. Your sprint range with CVs and CAs, will be 12 (s’nice!). But the range on Japanese patrols and bombers is something like 15/20.

It’s not gamey to sit out of detect range, and then run in. Makes perfect sense (and happened frequently historically: Raid on Marcus by Enterprise in February(?) and attacks on Marshalls by York in April(?).

But basically, if you’re trying to avoid KB, you need to consider anything within 20 – 25 hexes (includes the range of the planes), to be threatened. Give KB a wide berth if you don’t want to engage.

If your just playing the AI, it rarely uses full speed. So you’re more likely to detect something. But again, your effective range of PBYs is about 8, and up 10 when your crews are more experienced (in the 70s).

As far as alt goes, 6000’ works fairly well. Planes on NavSearch are generally trying to avoid be seen. My PBYs (or any other planes I use for search), rarely take air-to-air losses or flak for that matter either.

-F-


_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 10
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 8:39:21 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

The problem with PBYs and PBEM is that the "sprint range" (full speed) of KB, is 10 hexes for one day. So an opponent will sit at the edge of your range (12 hexes I think), and then run it at full speed the next turn to clobber you. Or if using Shok/Zui/Hiry/Sory (all speed 30+ kts), sprint range is 12 (Kaga and Akagi will slow the group to under 30 kts, so range is only 10). Once KB has some sys damage, you have less to worry for the 12 sprint range (because the sys dmg will bring them under 30 kts, and thus to sprint of 10)....

snip...


Thanks for the tip Feinder. It sounds like what I was theorizing. With a good opponent, the "dash" range is perfect for the Japanese player to slip in & hit every time without warning. Sigh. I may as well not have any PBYs on naval search at this rate.


By the way - I've seen it posted...whats the KB? Can't figure out the initials though I do get the drift.

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 11
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 8:51:34 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
KB= Kido Butai. (Mobile Force)

When i'm in charge it also stands for Kick Butt.



_____________________________


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 12
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 8:52:47 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
KB = Kido Butai. It's what the Japanese Navy called their main carrier striking force.

Usually KB is the "main" force of the IJN player. Some players split up their CVs. But if they've got 4 out of 6, those four would be KB. You'll also hear "mini-KB", which is usually the collection of CVLs and CVEs.

But yes, on 2-day turns, PBYs are of “marginal” usefulness. Even a bombardment group by Japan (like the fast BBs and CAs), will have a sprint range of 20 hexes (or 24 if all CAs).

It sucks, but it’s a fact of life.

Take solace in knowing that while IJN loves to sprint around, it expends a LOT of fuel, and it racks up sys damage fairly quick that way. If he keeps it up, you should start to see a slack in sorties by KB, around April/May. By then, his carriers will have around/almost/more than 20 sys damage, from charging around a full speed. That either means he’s got to sit in port for good while to work that sys damage down, or risk having his flight deck(s) closed from a single bomb hit.

Just something to keep in mind, and use to any advantage that you can.

-F-


_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 13
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 9:02:38 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

KB= Kido Butai. (Mobile Force)





Ah I see

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 14
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 9:05:30 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

KB = Kido Butai. It's what the Japanese Navy called their main carrier striking force.

Usually KB is the "main" force of the IJN player. Some players split up their CVs. But if they've got 4 out of 6, those four would be KB. You'll also hear "mini-KB", which is usually the collection of CVLs and CVEs.

But yes, on 2-day turns, PBYs are of “marginal” usefulness. Even a bombardment group by Japan (like the fast BBs and CAs), will have a sprint range of 20 hexes (or 24 if all CAs).

It sucks, but it’s a fact of life.

Take solace in knowing that while IJN loves to sprint around, it expends a LOT of fuel, and it racks up sys damage fairly quick that way. If he keeps it up, you should start to see a slack in sorties by KB, around April/May. By then, his carriers will have around/almost/more than 20 sys damage, from charging around a full speed. That either means he’s got to sit in port for good while to work that sys damage down, or risk having his flight deck(s) closed from a single bomb hit.

Just something to keep in mind, and use to any advantage that you can.

-F-



Thanks F,
Hmm, just a thought - what with G3Ms having a radius of 22+ hexes, is there a general point/range for all of us where naval search gets pretty useless or is it driven by squadron experiance?

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 15
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 9:09:25 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
The code was tweaked a while back so that the farther out a search plane goes the less efficient it will get, so if you've set your planes to maximum range they will actually be not too effective as the fringe areas. Setting your search range to less than max IIRC, will improve search results somewhat (within the set range of course)



_____________________________


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 16
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 9:14:46 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

The code was tweaked a while back so that the farther out a search plane goes the less efficient it will get, so if you've set your planes to maximum range they will actually be not too effective as the fringe areas. Setting your search range to less than max IIRC, will improve search results somewhat (within the set range of course)



ok..
But there is no real range that search becomes pointless, say 12 hexes 18 hexes 22 hexes... if your crew is good and your not quite on max range you'll continue to be effective as long as your up there eh?

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 17
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 9:18:28 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
There's no hardline graph point because it's influenced by so many factors including crew exp rating, weather, size of TF, etc etc etc ad nausia etc.

From my own experiences i'd say any TF more than 10 hexes away from a base has a good chance of staying undetected unless its in a coastal hex

_____________________________


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 18
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 9:24:18 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

There's no hardline graph point because it's influenced by so many factors including crew exp rating, weather, size of TF, etc etc etc ad nausia etc.

From my own experiences i'd say any TF more than 10 hexes away from a base has a good chance of staying undetected unless its in a coastal hex


Well I guess I could experiment with that using both sides of a two-player-hot-seat game.

Thanks Nikademus, where ever you are orbiting up there.

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 19
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 9:32:19 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
The TF is out there......(X files whistling in the background)



_____________________________


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 20
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 9:42:24 PM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline
So as to give early warning, would a small sub picket line be in order for the front line bases such as Midway etc?

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 21
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 9:46:53 PM   
Kereguelen


Posts: 1829
Joined: 5/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cookie monster

So as to give early warning, would a small sub picket line be in order for the front line bases such as Midway etc?


Yes, actually this is what the USN used subs for in 1942 (and Halsey even tried this in 1944).

(in reply to cookie monster)
Post #: 22
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 10:03:34 PM   
Bradley7735


Posts: 2073
Joined: 7/12/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kereguelen


quote:

ORIGINAL: cookie monster

So as to give early warning, would a small sub picket line be in order for the front line bases such as Midway etc?


Yes, actually this is what the USN used subs for in 1942 (and Halsey even tried this in 1944).


Subs were used as scouting forces all through the war. The scouting subs actually contributed to the Battle of the Philipine Sea (sinking Taiho and Shokaku), and Leyete Gulf (sinking Atago, Maya, some cripples after (Nachi and a CL, I think), and damaging Takao, Aoba) As the war progressed, first sightings were usually from scouting subs.

After 42, merchant seeking subs would be redirected in the few days before the US expected the Japanese fleet to sortie. But, in 42, they were generally on patrol in the scouting role (not looking for merchants).

_____________________________

The older I get, the better I was.

(in reply to Kereguelen)
Post #: 23
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 10:30:51 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kereguelen


quote:

ORIGINAL: cookie monster

So as to give early warning, would a small sub picket line be in order for the front line bases such as Midway etc?


Yes, actually this is what the USN used subs for in 1942 (and Halsey even tried this in 1944).

Funny that was mentioned

I have just about the entire Pacific Fleet Sub Force on one long continuous arc from Dutch Harbor down to Johnson as a screen (God knows they can't shoot) and anyway - the only good they have done as scouts is to get attacked by the Japanese as the IJN comes rampaging through the sub picket line on it's way to attack something...the subs never spot or attack, I just know the japs are there because my subs get attacked. Oh well at least that's one expensive way to patrol.

Mind you, they never see anything. Earlier on I had a double line of subs around Wake Is before I evacuated it, and the japs would cruise right across the subs coming and going on their merry way to bombard Wake, the subs never spotted let alone attacked anything.

(in reply to Kereguelen)
Post #: 24
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 10:33:01 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
Another -VERY- important factor in spotting ships, is sys damage.

Again, everybody likes sprinting around at warp 9. But that annoying sys damage can bite in so many ways. Any sys damage over 10, will increase your chance of detection. The more damaged you are, the easier to detect. Even with no fires (which add to ease of spotting you). But even if you’ve been good, and not run full speed with your CVs, adding a CL that’s got 12 sys damage from running FastTran to your TF, will up the chances of detecting the entire TF.

Granted, out of range, is out of range. Obviously, having 20 sys dmg means nothing if you’re sitting at a range of 15, when max range is 12 (or whatever). But having that extra sys dmg will increase your chance of being detected, that much farther out.

Having long-legged Patrols for Japan is nice. But there’s a price. Check his ops losses. If he’s flying his planes at 25 hexes, he’s probably taking a lot of ops losses, simply due to fatigue.

Max effective range, for anything, is about 10. Fatigue is about 1.5 per hex. Somebody with over 30 fatigue is less likely to fly, and even less likely to survive is he does. But like prev poster said, a lot goes into a mission (even patrols).

a. Watch your moral. Patrols do suffer moral loss! Low moral, means your squadron may never even get off the ground!
b. Fatigue, a unit that is already fatigued, will be less likely to fly, less effective searching, and less likely to return.
c. Experience. Higher exp means better chance to spot, and better info if you do.

Flying a group at 80% search, works fairly well. That puts three pilots in the bull-pen, and 9 out looking for bad-guys. It keeps your fatigue lower and moral higher.

Also to consider for exp, is to run Recon missions, with 80 search. The pilots get a better chance for exp if they actually spot something. But that means that flying patrols in a “quiet” area, means very slow exp gain (since there’s nothing to spot). But flying recon with 80% search, means that those three guys that would normally be in O-club, are on a recon mission, which gives them the better exp gain chance, than just flying and not spotting anything. Note this will fatigue your sqdn faster, since you’ve actually committed 100% of your sqdn, and nobody is sitting out. (* note there has to be an enemy base within range, to actually recon, otherwise, they sit in the O-club).

-F-


< Message edited by Feinder -- 7/13/2005 10:38:39 PM >


_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 25
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 10:49:51 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

Another -VERY- important factor in spotting ships, is sys damage.

snip....

-F-


Again, good advice and good to know, thanks Feinder.

However, this guy I'm playing against is savy enough not to run his ships ragged...(although one time, much to his chagrin, he left his CVs on max reaction range overnight and the pc chassed a cripple of mine at full speed for a day - and his CVs were out of gas the next game turn. He wasn't a happy camper about that. I was.)

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 26
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 11:18:47 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline
If you use AVs and AVDs its possible to build a search line with a near double overlap covering most of the Pacific. That gives you a detection zone that is more than 10 hexes wide, and is often 15-20 and you can operate behind that in relative safety.

(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 27
RE: PBYs - 7/13/2005 11:24:06 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Hunter

If you use AVs and AVDs its possible to build a search line with a near double overlap covering most of the Pacific. That gives you a detection zone that is more than 10 hexes wide, and is often 15-20 and you can operate behind that in relative safety.


Well, actually old boy, I have been doing just that with the AVDs and AVs. And every base operates two PBY squadrons, or is in overlap by the next search unit. With coverage like that I would have thought I was safe...but it isn't working out that way.
Bloody Japanese...

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 28
RE: PBYs - 7/14/2005 12:45:50 AM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
Also keep in mind due to the longer ranged aircraft that Japan has, the CV's sprint range is not 12. It is 12 + the normal range of the shortest ranged aircraft.

They don't have to sprint in to the hex of the target, they just need to get into range of the aircraft.

(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 29
RE: PBYs - 7/14/2005 12:47:06 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Another thing. I know Naval Search missions get less effective the farther out they get; does that apply to ASW patrols as well?

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> PBYs Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.438