Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Tech Support >> Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/20/2005 11:37:33 PM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		1. The intel screen shows a negative number for the number of Japanese aircraft lost.

2. The "get pilot" feature is no longer working. I click it and nothing happens. Is there a limit to how many pilots you can have on the map at one time or how many you can get killed in total?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by WiTP_Dude -- 8/20/2005 11:39:52 PM >

_____________________________


________________________________________
I feal so dirty when I sink convoys with 4E bombers, makes porn feal wholsome. - Brady, Founding Member of the Japanese Fanboy Club
Post #: 1
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/21/2005 6:03:10 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		Hi
one is probably a "bug" and the other is most likely "by design".

1. The first seems to be a problem with signed/unsigned values in program. Once the number of kills hits 32767, it then counts down from -1. The count should most likely be shown as 34058. Workaround would be to add the negative value to 65535.

2. The pilot table can hold 20,000 entries. Once there are more required, the game might disable the button as there is no more room to get pilots. Seems logical.

Michael

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 2
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/21/2005 12:48:22 PM   
Widell


Posts: 913
Joined: 4/27/2005
From: Trollhättan, Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Hi
one is probably a "bug" and the other is most likely "by design".

1. The first seems to be a problem with signed/unsigned values in program. Once the number of kills hits 32767, it then counts down from -1. The count should most likely be shown as 34058. Workaround would be to add the negative value to 65535.

2. The pilot table can hold 20,000 entries. Once there are more required, the game might disable the button as there is no more room to get pilots. Seems logical.

Michael


If you are correct, I hope someone with designer powers add these to a list of things to be fixed. Both are a sign of not forseeing the development in the later stages of the game and should be fixed (the running out of table space might be a tricky one, but the negative number one should (?) be possible to fix when initiating the variable (?))

Did anyone mention a 1.603 patch?

/Robert

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 3
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/21/2005 12:49:44 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline 		Don't hold your breath...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Widell)
Post #: 4
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/21/2005 5:13:03 PM   
jdcorley

 

Posts: 42
Joined: 10/30/2004
Status: offline 		I have a similar item to #1. My Allied Base points is a negative number. BTW, I haven't downloaded 1.5 or 1.6 yet, as I was so close to winning I didn't want to start over ... just in case!

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 5
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/21/2005 6:31:29 PM   
Sharkosaurus rex


Posts: 467
Joined: 10/19/2004
From: under the waves
Status: offline 		The total a-2-a losses shows a negative as well.

Didn't another GG game have 20k pilot limit too?

_____________________________

Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?

(in reply to jdcorley)
Post #: 6
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/21/2005 7:34:42 PM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

1. The first seems to be a problem with signed/unsigned values in program. Once the number of kills hits 32767, it then counts down from -1. The count should most likely be shown as 34058. Workaround would be to add the negative value to 65535.


I do think it has something do with 2^15 but I'm not sure it is counting backward. That would mean I lost over 80,000 aircraft in air-to-air engagements and this is not correct.

quote:


2. The pilot table can hold 20,000 entries. Once there are more required, the game might disable the button as there is no more room to get pilots. Seems logical.


This seems likely. I may have to start letting all those transport squadrons get destroyed on the ground because they are useless at this point and have a lot of pilots. Also, some of my squadrons have much more than their assigned number of pilots.

_____________________________


________________________________________
I feal so dirty when I sink convoys with 4E bombers, makes porn feal wholsome. - Brady, Founding Member of the Japanese Fanboy Club

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 7
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/22/2005 2:15:27 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		If you read my statement again. The count holds values up to 65535, but when it is displayed it will show values from -32766 to 32767.
quote:


1. The first seems to be a problem with signed/unsigned values in program. Once the number of kills hits 32767, it then counts down from -1. The count should most likely be
shown as 34058. Workaround would be to add the negative value to 65535.


Michael

< Message edited by michaelm -- 8/22/2005 2:19:00 AM >

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 8
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/22/2005 7:23:50 AM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

If you read my statement again. The count holds values up to 65535, but when it is displayed it will show values from -32766 to 32767.
quote:


1. The first seems to be a problem with signed/unsigned values in program. Once the number of kills hits 32767, it then counts down from -1. The count should most likely be
shown as 34058. Workaround would be to add the negative value to 65535.


Michael


OK. I guess they just never thought the Japs would lose that many planes.

_____________________________


________________________________________
I feal so dirty when I sink convoys with 4E bombers, makes porn feal wholsome. - Brady, Founding Member of the Japanese Fanboy Club

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 9
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/22/2005 10:12:58 PM   
Gilligan

 

Posts: 78
Joined: 6/19/2002
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline 		Getting the same results here with my opponent...we are at 8/6/44 and neither can add pilots to units. I am checking to see if the computer is filling them out automatically with this next turn, but if not then this is really bad. I will begin my mornings with a prayer to the pilot pool gods...

_____________________________


(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 10
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/23/2005 1:53:22 AM   
dwbradley

 

Posts: 197
Joined: 3/21/2004
Status: offline 		I'm Gilligan's opponent and see on my latest turn that not only is the button not working ( worked once then locked up) but also that units awaiting pilots (that is, more ready aircraft than pilots) are not being filled. I have the japanese side and have approximately 7500 hundred aircraft of all types right now.

Lately I had noticed that the working of the button had become erratic (or so it seemed) but I thought that the auto fill was working ok. If it was it isn't now.

(in reply to Gilligan)
Post #: 11
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/23/2005 3:19:28 AM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		I'm still having problems getting the "get pilot" feature to work. Looks like I will be firing a turn off to technical support.

_____________________________


________________________________________
I feal so dirty when I sink convoys with 4E bombers, makes porn feal wholsome. - Brady, Founding Member of the Japanese Fanboy Club

(in reply to dwbradley)
Post #: 12
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/23/2005 12:45:32 PM   
Sharkosaurus rex


Posts: 467
Joined: 10/19/2004
From: under the waves
Status: offline 		This can be a disaster because of the too many planes to pilots bug. People's AF won't be flying! At least the Jap player should be able to use up any pilots before the Allied player's turn.

_____________________________

Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 13
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/24/2005 10:31:59 PM   
Aawulf

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 7/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sharkosaurus rex

This can be a disaster because of the too many planes to pilots bug. People's AF won't be flying! At least the Jap player should be able to use up any pilots before the Allied player's turn.

I have been perplexed by this 20,000 pilot limit since I started building the WitPExcel editor in June. This is a HUGE problem.

Regards,

Michael Fleshman

(in reply to Sharkosaurus rex)
Post #: 14
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/24/2005 10:47:19 PM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aawulf

I have been perplexed by this 20,000 pilot limit since I started building the WitPExcel editor in June. This is a HUGE problem.

Regards,

Michael Fleshman


Maybe they should just increase it to 30,000 (or some other number) if it is causing problems across the board.

_____________________________


________________________________________
I feal so dirty when I sink convoys with 4E bombers, makes porn feal wholsome. - Brady, Founding Member of the Japanese Fanboy Club

(in reply to Aawulf)
Post #: 15
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/24/2005 10:54:44 PM   
Aawulf

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 7/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WiTP_Dude

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aawulf

I have been perplexed by this 20,000 pilot limit since I started building the WitPExcel editor in June. This is a HUGE problem.

Regards,

Michael Fleshman


Maybe they should just increase it to 30,000 (or some other number) if it is causing problems across the board.


The air OOB for the standard scenario 15 has 10,643 potential Jap pilots and 19,633 potential Allied pilots. Clearly the problem wasn't manufactured by our editing. I agree that it should be increased by a significant number.

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 16
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/24/2005 10:57:28 PM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aawulf


The air OOB for the standard scenario 15 has 10,643 potential Jap pilots and 19,633 potential Allied pilots. Clearly the problem wasn't manufactured by our editing. I agree that it should be increased by a significant number.


Just for clarification: do the two sides have to split up the 20,000 pilots or does that just refer to the Allied side?

_____________________________


________________________________________
I feal so dirty when I sink convoys with 4E bombers, makes porn feal wholsome. - Brady, Founding Member of the Japanese Fanboy Club

(in reply to Aawulf)
Post #: 17
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/24/2005 11:19:42 PM   
Aawulf

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 7/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WiTP_Dude

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aawulf


The air OOB for the standard scenario 15 has 10,643 potential Jap pilots and 19,633 potential Allied pilots. Clearly the problem wasn't manufactured by our editing. I agree that it should be increased by a significant number.


Just for clarification: do the two sides have to split up the 20,000 pilots or does that just refer to the Allied side?

They share the 20,000 slots.

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 18
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/24/2005 11:32:40 PM   
dwbradley

 

Posts: 197
Joined: 3/21/2004
Status: offline 		Gilligan and I have put our PBEM game on hold until we can figure out how to proceed. We have been using 2-day turns and have reached mid-August '44 so we may be a bit ahead of some people. We are hoping for a quick fix, such as a change in this one variable ( or the limits thereof), recompile and put out another beta. This hope may be unrealistic but without my daily fix(es) I cannot guarantee that I will remain an unproductive member of society.

I see now the 20K number when I examine the scenario using the database editor. We jointly have over 23K planes already in the game. I have not tried to count all of my empty slots ( not a quick task but may do so if someone needs this info to work toward a fix) but it seems to me that we are not 3000 pilots short. This condition has only been noticed by us in the last 2 weeks or so of game time.


(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 19
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/25/2005 5:40:24 AM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aawulf

They share the 20,000 slots.


OK, thanks. Zeta16 also reports a shortage of pilots - he is playing the Allied side.

_____________________________


________________________________________
I feal so dirty when I sink convoys with 4E bombers, makes porn feal wholsome. - Brady, Founding Member of the Japanese Fanboy Club

(in reply to Aawulf)
Post #: 20
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/25/2005 9:58:43 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		One problem could be the pilots who not arrived yet, ie the have a delay date in database which has not been reached yet. This could be holding onto slots.

Also, from what I worked out a while back, if a pilot in the scenario database is not assigned to a Group, he does not even get loaded into the in-game pilot slots. The inverse holds true too, if a pilot is assigned to a group that never arrives, that slot is basically used up for the game period.

Michael

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 21
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/25/2005 12:17:56 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		If you have a current save, I can examine it and see if all the pilot slots have been assigned. Send it to (michaelm75@hotmail.com)

Michael

quote:

Gilligan and I have put our PBEM game on hold until we can figure out how to proceed. We have been using 2-day turns and have reached mid-August '44 so we may be a bit ahead of some people. We are hoping for a quick fix, such as a change in this one variable ( or the limits thereof), recompile and put out another beta. This hope may be unrealistic but without my daily fix(es) I cannot guarantee that I will remain an unproductive member of society.

I see now the 20K number when I examine the scenario using the database editor. We jointly have over 23K planes already in the game. I have not tried to count all of my empty slots ( not a quick task but may do so if someone needs this info to work toward a fix) but it seems to me that we are not 3000 pilots short. This condition has only been noticed by us in the last 2 weeks or so of game time.


(in reply to dwbradley)
Post #: 22
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/25/2005 2:13:45 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline 		Hi,

Do KIA and MIA pilots stay in slots?

If so could there be a way of clearing them out? The reason I say this is because BTR also has a pilot limit. I know WiTP has 'moved on' in many ways but with an editor in BTR you could cull these KIA and MIA pilots freeing slots up.

Regards,

Steven

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 23
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/25/2005 3:03:51 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		I have seen no indication that they stay in the pilot table.

Michael

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 24
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/25/2005 3:22:37 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		I am wrong.
If the pilot is listed as a top pilot and has suffered a fate (MIA,KIA), it appears he will stay in the pilot list (because you need his name, group, etc for the list) until he drops off the list.

Michael

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 25
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/25/2005 4:44:39 PM   
Sharkosaurus rex


Posts: 467
Joined: 10/19/2004
From: under the waves
Status: offline 		KIA and MIA drop off the Top Gun pilot list the turn of their calamity.

We'll all have to go back to the Coral Sea scenario! Not too many planes here.

_____________________________

Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 26
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/26/2005 3:41:46 AM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sharkosaurus rex

KIA and MIA drop off the Top Gun pilot list the turn of their calamity.


I have lots of KIA and MIA on my list:






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


________________________________________
I feal so dirty when I sink convoys with 4E bombers, makes porn feal wholsome. - Brady, Founding Member of the Japanese Fanboy Club

(in reply to Sharkosaurus rex)
Post #: 27
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/26/2005 4:55:16 AM   
Sharkosaurus rex


Posts: 467
Joined: 10/19/2004
From: under the waves
Status: offline 		I have never seen a pilot with any fate other than -.
I have only played scen#15.
I have played PBEM, h-2-h (testing) and a little -v-AI.
I have used both sides.

_____________________________

Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 28
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/26/2005 5:19:39 AM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sharkosaurus rex

I have never seen a pilot with any fate other than -.
I have only played scen#15.
I have played PBEM, h-2-h (testing) and a little -v-AI.
I have used both sides.


One of us most have another bug.

_____________________________


________________________________________
I feal so dirty when I sink convoys with 4E bombers, makes porn feal wholsome. - Brady, Founding Member of the Japanese Fanboy Club

(in reply to Sharkosaurus rex)
Post #: 29
RE: Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs - 8/26/2005 5:46:46 AM   
Sharkosaurus rex


Posts: 467
Joined: 10/19/2004
From: under the waves
Status: offline 		I'm currently playing with 1.6 and haven't seen any pilot fates.



_____________________________

Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Tech Support >> Two Late-War Aircraft Bugs Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.500