rhondabrwn
Posts: 2570
Joined: 9/29/2004 From: Snowflake, Arizona Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft Thanks for your thoughts Rhonda. There is no compelling reason for a Linux wargame. Can a wargame compell Linux though? ;) I suppose I am trying to determine whether the generally accepted theory that it is applications which determine what operating system people use is true in this particular niche area. So far, based on a highly scientific sample of one, the answer would appear to be no :) Your viewpoint has been valid in the past. Witness how Visicalc drove sales of the Apple II computer into business and home markets and launched the computer revolution. Ever since then, people have searched for "the Killer App" that would drive the same kind of systemic conversion. The term has kinda gone out of usage as the proliferation of computer applications has pretty much done away with the possibility of anyone coming up with such an original (and uncopyable) product. The Mac did present some unique opportunities when it competed with an graphically challenged PC, but that differential has evaporated over the years. One can split hairs arguing over whether a Mac is better at movie editing and so forth, but the differences really aren't enough for the average person to see any real difference. (Note: I used to be a Mac fanatic at one time, but now a computer is a computer to me). Linux, of course, is just an open source version of UNIX so there is really nothing there to drive a unique application (or wargame) that would have any particular advantage over a Windows machine. Yes, it's more secure from virus attacks, but mostly because it's not a big target right now. So... could there be a "killer" wargame that would be so good and so unique to Linux that it would drive people to convert? I really can't imagine it happening.
_____________________________
Love & Peace, Far Dareis Mai My old Piczo site seems to be gone, so no more Navajo Nation pics :(
|