Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!!

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!!

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/20/2005 10:16:32 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Fellow Gamers and Strategic Geniuses!

In my campaign with Moses (MOSES DO NOT READ THIS!

) we have reached mid-July 1942. I have taken far more islands and territory then the Japanese did in the war. I have grabbed Luganvile, PM, Suva and Efate. I am giving strong consideration to making an attempt at Noumea.

Made a grab earlier with very limited forces and got my (*&&^ kicked. I have at Lunga 3 Inf Div, 3 Art Reg, and 2 Eng Reg. These could be used for an attempt there. My KB is intact and currently upgrading--I have only lost Junyo and Hiryu. Pilot quality is OK. I have a lot of fighters at Luganville and Efate. We have been engaged in a see-saw aerial battle. The US and British Navy have taken damage but only the USS Hornet has gone down. Rest of his CVs are intact. He has 3 Inf Div and numerous BF on New Caledonia.

The essential question is should I make a grab here? Moses thinks I will. I am not so certain. These are my thoughts:
1. Roll the dice and try...probably fail or stalemate.
2. Could make a lunge at eastern Australia. I already have all the NW Australian towns.
3. Use these Inf Units as garrision forces on my high priority islands.
4. Keep a Div or two back as a reaction force for his eventual 1942 counter-attack.

Whatever decision I make, it will be the last offensive if I go that way.

I throw myself onto the mercy of the readers.

What do you think?

Post #: 1

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/20/2005 10:50:06 PM

worr

Posts: 901
Joined: 2/7/2001
Status: offline

What is the present score?

And how are your BBs?

Worr, out

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 2

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/20/2005 10:50:22 PM

Mike Solli

Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

The first question that comes to mind is, do you want to take it to keep or is it just an attempt to hurt the allies a bit. If you want to keep it, how are you going to protect the supply convoys that will be needed? It's rather isolated. If you just want to destroy the ground and air units there, will it be worth the cost?

The US has some 4-5 CVs right now. They can put a hurting on something that isn't escorted by KB, and KB can't be everywhere. Even if you took on the US CVs and won, you'd trash you pilots. Do you have replacements for them?

I'd be cautious about invading Noumea in Jul 42. You have many years to go and not a lot of quality reinforcements. You need to decide if your losses are going to be worth it in the long run.

Finally, do you know what the Allies have on the ground there? If they have a few divisions, I don't think it's worth it at all.

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 3

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/20/2005 10:51:10 PM

kkoovvoo

Posts: 253
Joined: 10/1/2004
From: Slovakia
Status: offline

You dont have a chance to capture noumea with 3 div + some support if he has 3 div and is fortified. Those battle would break your backbone - im sure.

< Message edited by kkoovvoo -- 9/20/2005 10:52:10 PM >

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 4

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/20/2005 10:54:19 PM

Slaughtermeyer

Posts: 156
Joined: 5/10/2002
From: Pennsylvania
Status: offline

If you're doing well in Australia already, I'd consider E. Australia. Maybe New Zealand should be considered as a possible target too?

_____________________________

We must not allow ourselves to be drawn into a trial of the causes of the war,for our position is that no grievances or policies will justify resort to aggressive war.It is utterly renounced and condemned as an instrument of policy. R.Jackson,1945

(in reply to kkoovvoo)

Post #: 5

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/20/2005 10:57:46 PM

Mike Solli

Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

What's wrong with consolidating your position and raiding the Allied positions where you can cause them setbacks for little risk? I think that many Japanese players feel they need to continue to attack and gain ground. Take a look at your perimeter and see how thin your defenses are already spread.

(in reply to Slaughtermeyer)

Post #: 6

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/20/2005 11:55:14 PM

esteban

Posts: 618
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline

At this point, I would only go for Noumea if you realistically think that you can take and hold it, and that you need the big victory point swing from taking Noumea for an autovictory. Other than that, you control a lot of the islands near Noumea, so you can use KB to raid Noumea's supply lines, and possibly win a decisive carrier battle away from Noumea's airfields. Then you can take Noumea or starve it into irrelevance.

But if the Allies have 3 divisions on the island, with decent supplies and support, you are going to need to land 6-7 divisions +supplies and support to drive him out, plus beat his carrier AND Noumea's land-based air. That's a tall order in July, 1942.

(in reply to Mike Solli)

Post #: 7

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/20/2005 11:55:36 PM

rogueusmc

Posts: 4583
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Status: offline

You can ask Wobbly...he took Noumea from me...as well as Aukland, Wellington and Christchurch...it will be costly in the long run.

_____________________________

There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 8

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 12:41:53 AM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Those are all good notes. My gut tells me that it would be cost prohibitive.

I, personally, like the idea of a try at NE Australia. I know he doesn't have too much there. Since grabbing PM in March, there have been very few convoys going along the coast there. If I can force his hand some, there might be a chance of using the KB to hit his convoys and/or reinforcements that would HAVE to be sent there. I can also protect convoys somewhat by using PM as a LR CAP base. Might be a better and more controlable scenario.

Using the troops to consolidate would be good too. Putting a pair of divisions into the Marshalls would be a rude surprise! I have at least a brigade with support troops at Luganville, Efate, and Suva. Fortifications are all climbing.

If I don't take New Caledonia, then Efate and Luganville will become untenable pretty quickly due to his LBA. I have it pretty well knocked down at the moment. An 8 CV raid by the KB will do it nearly EVERY time!

The desire for one more good swing at Moses is almost overwhelming...

As to the BB question, most of my BBs are in solid shape. I have lost Haruna but gained Yamato. Musashi is coming along and should be ready within 30 days.

If I go for NE Australia, where should I target? Haven't ever REALLY thought about this as an option...should I land all 3 Inf Div at Townsville or go for Brisbane? If I land at Townsville, I can proceed north and destroy those garrisons at me leasure...

IMPORTANT NOTE: I do not know where his CVs are. I think they are in Auckland, NZ but cannot be for certain...

(in reply to rogueusmc)

Post #: 9

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 2:30:46 AM

RUPD3658

Posts: 6922
Joined: 8/28/2002
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Status: offline

Isolate it with LBA. An invasion is not worth it. The casualties will be high and it will be hard to hold/supply once you take it. You are too far from your strengths and too close to his.

Forget about Australia, there is little of value to be had there. Very little oil and not much HI. Plus, there are a lot of crazy Ozzies to harass you there.

If I was going to make one last offensive with my land units I would go for India. There is oil and HI there plus an overland campaign is easier to fight than an amphibious one. Lasly, it is too far for the Allies's strengths to put up much of a fight since only British units are in the theater. If you can bottle up the Allied units in Karachi it is doubtful they will ever be able to break out. The nice thing here is that all captured resourses and oil move overland and are not subject to interdiction.

_____________________________

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 10

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 3:05:35 AM

tsimmonds

Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline

Have you made any opposed landings since your +200 bonus for amphib landing expired? It gets ugly after April 1.

quote:

Putting a pair of divisions into the Marshalls would be a rude surprise!

Only problem with this is that there is no location in the Marshalls that is not more or less easily bypass-able.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to RUPD3658)

Post #: 11

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 7:36:49 AM

scout1

Posts: 2899
Joined: 8/24/2004
From: South Bend, In
Status: offline

Taking Noumea does appear to be a good choice given your description. Frankly, there really isn't a good reason to attempt to take this base. To far out, doesn't improve resource/oil situation and can be isolated / bypassed later in the war. So other than the pleasure of kicking some Allied butt, no strategic advantage taking this base. Now it might be worthwild in starving it for some time with an occassional raid. Just because the Japanese flag isn't planted on the beach doesn't mean it necessary will have value to the Allies. Troops/base need supplies, ships need fuel. It imports everything. Embargo this puppy.

(in reply to tsimmonds)

Post #: 12

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 7:15:52 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

OK. Orders have been issued.

I am going to go about this in two manners:

1. I will use 2/3 of my available force to attack NE Australia starting with Townsville and then move North. The REAL goal here will be to force a fight with his CVs. I have the ships available and shipping at-hand for the invasion force. I will attempt to disquise the move by having the convoys head for PM (like a regular supply run I have been doing) and then have them swing south. Three days should put them at Townsville.

Do you think I should land on the city hex or take the beach north of the town?

I will move with enough force (2 Inf Div, 2 Eng Reg, a large BF, and a Tank Brigade) to immediately take the city. I'll figure a Brigade of Inf, 2-3 support units, and a fort of 9 for resistance. I think that should be enough to take it...

KB will cover the seaward side and look for trouble. Fighters and bombers from GG/PM will help on the westward side and Recon/Bombers from Suva/Efate will scout and watch the eastward side. SS to move in and create a line near Auckland.

D-Day will be set for two weeks or about August 1, 1942.

2. I like the offensive into India idea. I already have one going on there and will reinforce it. I have surrounded and laid seige to Mandalay and am driving on Imphal. I will lift 2 Inf Div from the Phil and reinforce this drive. Should be enough to make a significant progress....

I hold Akyab and everything south of Mandalay.

Any thoughts here from people who have done this strategy before?? Lessons learned???

(in reply to scout1)

Post #: 13

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 7:35:11 PM

Slaughtermeyer

Posts: 156
Joined: 5/10/2002
From: Pennsylvania
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Do you think I should land on the city hex or take the beach north of the town?

Send recon aircraft when you get a little closer. Multiply the reported allied force by 3 to get a better idea of what's really there. If he's weak, go for the city hex.

_____________________________

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 14

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 7:37:09 PM

Jim D Burns

Posts: 4013
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Salida, CA.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Any thoughts here from people who have done this strategy before?? Lessons learned???

The only advice I would give is be careful not to allow yourself to suffer from victory disease. Remember its July 1942, the pendulum is going to swing against you very soon no matter what, so anything that has its neck sticking out is going to get its head chopped off in very short order. Always look to your line of withdrawal and make sure you can extricate yourself once you see the shift in momentum. It's right around the corner.

Also make sure your defensive perimeter is set. Soon you won't be able to freely move assets around as you have been doing up to this point, so make sure everything is set.

Lastly, always assume your going to lose everything you throw into an offensive this late in the war. Then ask yourself is your potential gain really worth that loss.

Jim

_____________________________

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 15

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 7:37:35 PM

anarchyintheuk

Posts: 3921
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Dallas
Status: offline

If you're just looking to provoke his CVs, I don't think you can find a worse place to fight than next to his airbases in Aussieland. From your previous description it sounded like you had decent assets at Efate and Luganville to support a drive at Noumea (or just a fake one, if you're only trying to provoke a reaction). Fight under your aircover. Trying to support an invasion of Townsville w/ cover from PM is difficult.

Factors I don't know are how built up Noumea, Efate, Luganville, PM and the Aussie bases are.

Sounds like you need about 3 more divs to do it, but wiping 3 IDs from the Allied OOB can be worth a risk. Just my two cents.

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 16

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 7:46:32 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Good thoughts and ideas. I have moved two squadrons of Emily's to G-G for some scouting. I will disquise this by sending ALL my scouts out to nearby bases. Hopefully...it will distract him from my real goal...

I wish I could recon Auckland and find out if his CV are there or not. Would help me sleep a little better at night!

I have been supplying and building up the defenses of the perimeter fairly well. It is weak at this point but troops are moving about to shore things up. My LBA is concentrated pretty heavily along the Lunga-Luganville-Efate-Suva line.

(in reply to anarchyintheuk)

Post #: 17

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 7:53:57 PM

saj42

Posts: 1125
Joined: 4/19/2005
From: Somerset, England
Status: offline

Go for limited gains in India. IMHO PzB is the master in this theatre

Fighting through the trails to Imphal etc will be slow and painful. If you are going to launch an invasion then land in the Chandpur / Calcutta area. Good size bases and malaria free too. For defense you will have several mutually supporting airbases and a narrow front line on land. This depends on Moses troop dispositions - if they are all on the Burma border you can isolate them grind them down.

What state is the Brit navy in?

_____________________________

Banner by rogueusmc

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 18

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 8:34:18 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

I have sunk 3 British BB and severely damaged a CV and CVL. Several CA and DD have gone down as well. I have to think that he is pretty vulnerable at sea there. His LBA is in good shape.

It will take a while move shipping and troops to this area. Guess I will begin Prep Points.

Like the limited goals approach to Burma/India. Should shift Moses' attention from China to a, perhaps, much more vulnerable arena.

(in reply to saj42)

Post #: 19

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 9:31:37 PM

saj42

Posts: 1125
Joined: 4/19/2005
From: Somerset, England
Status: offline

SEAC gets a decent amount of reinforcement by this time, so all depends on the troop dispositions. Attriting his LBA is going to be a difficult task using IJA LBA only - do you risk the KB in those restricted waters? With Rangoon, Mandalay and Akyab in your possession at least your convoys can be LRCAPed all the way to the beaches.

_____________________________

Banner by rogueusmc

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 20

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/21/2005 10:55:58 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

I could reinforce the theatre with Zeros and Bettys. I could also wait for Tojos and Tonys in August and make re-fitting in Burma #1 Priority. What about that?

If Moses refuses to deploy his carriers for the Australia thrust, then I could easily send the KB in that direction towards Burma. He would probably think they were heading home for refit... My CBA would certainly chew up his Hurricanes and other fighters...

(in reply to saj42)

Post #: 21

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/22/2005 12:18:41 AM

niceguy2005

Posts: 12523
Joined: 7/4/2005
From: Super secret hidden base
Status: offline

Just my two cents. Is it possible for you to use Nomeau as a decoy? I think my priorities in the area would be.
1. Isolate it if possible and make him work hard to resupply.
2. Try a couple of faints to keep his attention on it and off NE Australia.

Who knows, maybe you can goad him into putting some CV's in range of your long range bombers and you can pick off one or two.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 22

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/22/2005 12:06:30 PM

Sneer

Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline

my two - cents- not woth to go there -
KB cann't secure whole area , unless enemy is broken and has lost all CV target is too risky.
once in AI game enemy raided Nomua twice successfully - human player will be even better.
I found myself having inadequate airforce in region as you need cover strong enought to stand 4 cv enemy raid + constant risk of easy bombarding airfield from NZ in bad weather ( I had this bad luck and had to evacuate) shipping line are terrible there and it doesn't cut supply routes for allies just delay convoys for a week or so - not worth!
consider also costs of taking this base in mid 42 - too high! certainly it will be extremaly difficult to inflict 4:1 losses in Nomua region

(in reply to niceguy2005)

Post #: 23

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/22/2005 2:36:12 PM

JeffroK

Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

Work out what your priorities are:
Destroying CV's, Capturing Oil/Resources, Destroying LCU's

Then work out the safest place to do this, earlier comments about drawing the USN into your (substantial) Land based Air umbrella make much sense.

Dont split your forces too small, make a plan and go for it, dont make 3 plans and find that none are strong enough for success (You make be able to stagger them a bit to maximise support)

Give any plan a bash, you aint playing for Sheep Stations, are you?

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Sneer)

Post #: 24

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/22/2005 5:01:55 PM

mc3744

Posts: 1957
Joined: 3/9/2004
From: Italy
Status: offline

Just saw this.

I wouldn't attack.
Either you take Noumea by February/January and try to lock down the supplies to Australia or it's just one more base to defend and you already have enough.

_____________________________

Nec recisa recedit

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 25

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/22/2005 5:30:45 PM

worr

Posts: 901
Joined: 2/7/2001
Status: offline

I don't think you ever said what was your score. The only reason I'd take it is to get the automatic victory.

You could take it, but you wouldn't be able to hold it.

Worr, out

(in reply to mc3744)

Post #: 26

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/22/2005 5:44:42 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

I am leadeding Moses by about 10,000 VP but am no one near autovictory.

I continue to think about my plans.

I will make a double thrust--the immediate goals will be the capture of NE Australia. Since I have Suva, Efate, Luganville, PM, and GG, this should help to REALLY force Moses into a fight. I will use the land invasion to create an atmosphere that DEMANDS action. If he doesn't, then I will take the bases and force him to liberate here while I build-up elsewhere...

Second thrust, which will take longer to do, will be a limited invasion of Northern Burma/Eastern India. He has a lot of forces at Mandalay and preparing to resist me at Imphal. I will do an end-around with several divisions and support troops.

More thoughts...

(in reply to worr)

Post #: 27

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/22/2005 5:49:55 PM

worr

Posts: 901
Joined: 2/7/2001
Status: offline

There are no points in the NE Aussie land.

Worr, out

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 28

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/22/2005 5:57:32 PM

AmiralLaurent

Posts: 3351
Joined: 3/11/2003
From: Near Paris, France
Status: offline

I don't see why an invasion of NE Australia will draw his CVs, especially if yours are in the area. Once you will land in Australia, you will probably find a lot of Australian troops unable to leave the country and ready to fight. Probably every town of NE Australia will be hold by a division rather than a brigade.

Probably the India option is the best at this time. Keep the KB in Pacific and a reserve of 3 divisions and wait for the incoming Allied offensive. Then try to crush it Guadalcanal-like... well better than Guadalcanal-like from Japanese POW

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 29

RE: Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!! - 9/22/2005 6:10:42 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

AdmiralLaurent--those are good thoughts. Lets see what everyone else throws out and see...

If I am CRAZY, let me know! If you have different, better ideas, chime in on the discussion...

(in reply to AmiralLaurent)

Post #: 30

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> Noumea--To Take or Not to Take?!!

Page: [1] 2 next > >>