Wild Bill -> RE: How Many Actually Use the OOB Editor? (1/12/2006 7:57:06 AM)
|
All well and good. To each his own. I have no problem with that. What is nightmarish for me as a scenario and campaign designer is trying to find just what to use that will suit all. So, I try to stick with what has been called the "vanilla version," or the latest officially approved update from Matrix. Don't get me wrong. I appreciate and greatly admire those who have labored long and hard to make the OOBs more accurate according to their information or point of view. There are, however, many who play Steel Panthers who have never visited this web site, but who do look at the Wargamer for new battles. And there are all of you. What are you using. Which set of OOBs are yours of choice. How can I create a battle that honors and respects four different sets of OOBs. If I use one, I offend three other guys who worked very hard on their own OOBs. I have lived through numerous OOB teams over the last five years, including the one headed up by Scott Grasse, then Paul Vebber, then Bryan Melvin, and maybe Harry Zahn and Stuart Millis. and I'm sure I missed someone. This will probably go on forever and those who are expert in this field should pursue it. But as for the scenarios and campaigns that my teams design, they will use the latest OOB versions officially approved by Matrix. Its the only norm I know to follow. I will now start stating in each intro text which OOB or particular version of SPWAW we used in the scenario design. Good luck to all of you who have taken on this noble task. WIld Bill
|
|
|
|