DDs finding and destroying mines? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945



Message


barnacle bob -> DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 8:00:45 PM)

Just curious. [&:]What is the justification for this? I read every thing I can about the Pacific Theatre. I don’t recall reading anything about this (I may have and it did not sink in). I know the US used IJN DDs, after the war, to clear mines….the old fashion way by hitting them.[&:]




rtrapasso -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 8:14:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: barnacle bob

Just curious. [&:]What is the justification for this? I read every thing I can about the Pacific Theatre. I don’t recall reading anything about this (I may have and it did not sink in). I know the US used IJN DDs, after the war, to clear mines….the old fashion way by hitting them.[&:]


Ships (esp smaller, maneuverable warships) would post double lookouts and spot the mines by advancing (slowly) into minefields. The spotted mines would then be shot with MG and small cannons (i.e. 20 mm.) or even rifle fire. Even subs could do this.




barnacle bob -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 8:23:55 PM)

Thanks.

OK. That is what I thought. I just never saw it in writing.




rtrapasso -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 8:48:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: barnacle bob

Thanks.

OK. That is what I thought. I just never saw it in writing.


I've read different accounts of it. Not a really good idea to send a non-minesweeper into a minefield, but it happens sometimes (usually inadvertantly).




Nikademus -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 8:50:36 PM)

definately not a good idea....i've lost more than one that way......always send expendible PC's or MSW's if you have em




rtrapasso -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 8:53:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

definately not a good idea....i've lost more than one that way......always send expendible PC's or MSW's if you have em



like this guy...

[image]local://upfiles/7543/79490624ECB5468FBD508C309DF21BD9.jpg[/image]




Terminus -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 9:03:26 PM)

The lesson: no matter how much you hate your job, somebody always has it worse...




Mike Scholl -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 9:20:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

quote:

ORIGINAL: barnacle bob

Just curious. [&:]What is the justification for this? I read every thing I can about the Pacific Theatre. I don’t recall reading anything about this (I may have and it did not sink in). I know the US used IJN DDs, after the war, to clear mines….the old fashion way by hitting them.[&:]


Ships (esp smaller, maneuverable warships) would post double lookouts and spot the mines by advancing (slowly) into minefields. The spotted mines would then be shot with MG and small cannons (i.e. 20 mm.) or even rifle fire. Even subs could do this.


Which works alright with "floating" mines, but the great majority are moored and held several feet (10-30) "below" the surface---not something "lookouts" are likely to spot. And of course, in the game, DD's perform this task at ANY speed, not the 2 or 3 knots you are speeking of. Except for specific "DMS" ships, the whole "sweeping with DD's" is another piece of designer non-sense.




rtrapasso -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 9:36:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl


quote:

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

quote:

ORIGINAL: barnacle bob

Just curious. [&:]What is the justification for this? I read every thing I can about the Pacific Theatre. I don’t recall reading anything about this (I may have and it did not sink in). I know the US used IJN DDs, after the war, to clear mines….the old fashion way by hitting them.[&:]


Ships (esp smaller, maneuverable warships) would post double lookouts and spot the mines by advancing (slowly) into minefields. The spotted mines would then be shot with MG and small cannons (i.e. 20 mm.) or even rifle fire. Even subs could do this.


Which works alright with "floating" mines, but the great majority are moored and held several feet (10-30) "below" the surface---not something "lookouts" are likely to spot. And of course, in the game, DD's perform this task at ANY speed, not the 2 or 3 knots you are speeking of. Except for specific "DMS" ships, the whole "sweeping with DD's" is another piece of designer non-sense.


Floating mines generally weren't used - they were generally mines that broke free of mooring lines. The way it worked IRL : most of the mines were contact mines moored on cables (not going to discuss influence mines, electronically activated mines that are a different kettle of fish). Tides would effect the depth of the moored mines, so if you had a fairly significant tide (8-10 feet) you wanted to set your mines so that they would be somewhere just deep enough to be covered a few feet of water at low tide. That way you could be sure to hit ships at either low or high tide.

If the mines are 30' down, not much is going to be able to contact them. DD's and shallow draft ships aren't going to have to worry about them. The DDs can still assist the MSWs by shooting up the mines when the paravanes from the minesweepers cut the cables of the deeper mines. A lot of ships would also carry paravanes - someone pointed out some of the IJN CVs carried them (although i wouldn't want to put them on minesweeper duty).

If mines are set a shallower depths (as they usually were), then they would be fairly close to the surface at low tide - then they could be spotted and shot. We might assume that the e-commander of the MSW TF knows to do the job at the right time.




Oleg Mastruko -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 10:35:18 PM)

Does anyone remember how we got this rule?

It was back in UV days that IJN had only 13 MSWs in the whole game. I won one game as USN by concentrating on IJN MSWs. Killed 12 of them early on and mined everything. It seems like dirty and gamey play (which it was) but I always pay attention to mine warfare, I always kill MSWs and MLs when I can and I didn't do it on purpose (ie I would sink MSWs anyway, even if he had 60 of them). I think then it dawned to both me any my opponent how little MSWs Japanese have.

Some players complained about this so the "emergency minesweep" rule was intruduced, where DDs, PGs and PCs can sweep a mine or two - and *more importantly* - detect a minefield (minefield, once detected, is much less efficient in damaging ships).

I think it works fine - but if you don't bring a dedicated MSW or ten, don't invade my islands hoping DDs will do [;)]

O.




rtrapasso -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 10:43:06 PM)

Well, i've always found that DDs in minesweeper mode were prone to be sunk...




barnacle bob -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 10:46:53 PM)

quote:

but if you don't bring a dedicated MSW or ten, don't invade my islands hoping DDs will do


I mine every thing I can! I love mines!




bilbow -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 11:15:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko

Does anyone remember how we got this rule?

It was back in UV days that IJN had only 13 MSWs in the whole game. I won one game as USN by concentrating on IJN MSWs. Killed 12 of them early on and mined everything. It seems like dirty and gamey play (which it was) but I always pay attention to mine warfare, I always kill MSWs and MLs when I can and I didn't do it on purpose (ie I would sink MSWs anyway, even if he had 60 of them). I think then it dawned to both me any my opponent how little MSWs Japanese have.

Some players complained about this so the "emergency minesweep" rule was intruduced, where DDs, PGs and PCs can sweep a mine or two - and *more importantly* - detect a minefield (minefield, once detected, is much less efficient in damaging ships).

I think it works fine - but if you don't bring a dedicated MSW or ten, don't invade my islands hoping DDs will do [;)]

O.


I only need 10? Great! You must have really slowed down your mining ops! [:D]




Oleg Mastruko -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 11:17:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bilbow
I only need 10? Great! You must have really slowed down your mining ops! [:D]


In fact yes I did slow them down somewhat in our game - seeing how minefields deteriorate in WITP, and that I risk valuable MLs to lay mines that will "evaporate". But you never know which places are well mined and which are not [;)]




Ron Saueracker -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 11:18:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: barnacle bob

Thanks.

OK. That is what I thought. I just never saw it in writing.


Many also had paravanes to cutmine cables.




rtrapasso -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/14/2006 11:23:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker


quote:

ORIGINAL: barnacle bob

Thanks.

OK. That is what I thought. I just never saw it in writing.


Many also had paravanes to cutmine cables.


All the Soviet ships in the standard game have these guys to counter mines:

[image]local://upfiles/7543/78120A040B834F7488238448BB927611.jpg[/image]




Nikademus -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 12:49:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

definately not a good idea....i've lost more than one that way......always send expendible PC's or MSW's if you have em



like this guy...

[image]local://upfiles/7543/79490624ECB5468FBD508C309DF21BD9.jpg[/image]


I'm pretty good at Minesweeper...but i don't think i want to play that version....[X(]




el cid again -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 1:21:45 AM)

quote:

Does anyone remember how we got this rule?

It was back in UV days that IJN had only 13 MSWs in the whole game. I won one game as USN by concentrating on IJN MSWs. Killed 12 of them early on and mined everything. It seems like dirty and gamey play (which it was) but I always pay attention to mine warfare, I always kill MSWs and MLs when I can and I didn't do it on purpose (ie I would sink MSWs anyway, even if he had 60 of them). I think then it dawned to both me any my opponent how little MSWs Japanese have.


This story is quite true ! Including the part about how Oleg sinks Minesweepers. And so is the story about the 'fix' - which is utter nonsense.

The technology involved is paravanes. These are floats with wires attached strung from the bow - the mine cables catch the wires and that forces them up where riflemen can shoot them. Tricky, dangerous work, it was even done by my 16,000 ton APA (USS Francis Marion, APA-249, the last ever built). The problem is that UV/WITP allow this at high speed!!! That is impossible. Also it is much more likely to get your ship holed by a mine than using minesweepers is. Matrix is very anti-mine warfare - and said so on the UB board. They called realistic proposals a desire to play "mines in the Pacific." They deliberately ignore air laid mines. They fear (correctly) that Oleg (or any mine oriented player) would have a great advantage. Because the few naval officers that are DO have a great advantage. USN was defeated by mines as late as 1991 - if you believe USN reviews of the subject. Because we have not successfully kept up with mine technology - and because our major attempts are technical failures (see why we stopped building our last class of minehunters, or look up minesweeping sleds). Mine warfare is limited mainly because users don't use it. Defended minefields are very effective. See the fate of the Soviet Baltic Fleet at the hands of tiny Finland in WWII. [The greatest single victory for mine warfare in history was a battle over the Finnish minefields.] For a great US mine victory, see the WWI "mine barrage" in the North Sea - probably the greatest minefield ever laid.




rtrapasso -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 1:29:52 AM)

quote:

They deliberately ignore air laid mines.


??? [&:]

WITP has air-laid mines, and many players use them. You have to get to a certain date, however.

As for the SPEED of MSWs when conducting operations - the speed of the unit to and from the hex is specified. it is kind of vague how fast units are actually moving when conducting minesweeping ops, however, there probably should be some sort of ops points assessed for minesweeping operations, i think. But lots of stuff doesn't get assessed OPS Points that should in the game - heck, some of the time i notice that ships loading troops aren't assessed OPS points.




rtrapasso -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 1:32:16 AM)

quote:

The technology involved is paravanes. These are floats with wires attached strung from the bow - the mine cables catch the wires and that forces them up where riflemen can shoot them.


interesting - i had always read that the cables were cut. This makes more sense!!!




Cpt Sherwood -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 2:34:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

quote:

They deliberately ignore air laid mines.


??? [&:]

WITP has air-laid mines, and many players use them. You have to get to a certain date, however.

As for the SPEED of MSWs when conducting operations - the speed of the unit to and from the hex is specified. it is kind of vague how fast units are actually moving when conducting minesweeping ops, however, there probably should be some sort of ops points assessed for minesweeping operations, i think. But lots of stuff doesn't get assessed OPS Points that should in the game - heck, some of the time i notice that ships loading troops aren't assessed OPS points.


Except that they porked the air-laid mines, CAP can not engage bombers laying mines, so gamey to use that feature.

You can put a DMS or two in a surface combat taskforce and it will still do a 6 hex run in, fire and hit everything, and then run back out 6 hexes( plus it will make a path through the mine field all at the same time ).




rtrapasso -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 2:42:51 AM)

quote:

You can put a DMS or two in a surface combat taskforce and it will still do a 6 hex run in, fire and hit everything, and then run back out 6 hexes( plus it will make a path through the mine field all at the same time ).


Yeah - but this is a generalized WITP problem, not limited to mine warfare. You can similarly have a surface combat task force do something similar, while engaging in 2 or 3 battles. In some cases, people have calculated the TFs are moving at something close to 60 mph...




Mike Scholl -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 4:02:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko

Does anyone remember how we got this rule?

It was back in UV days that IJN had only 13 MSWs in the whole game. I won one game as USN by concentrating on IJN MSWs. Killed 12 of them early on and mined everything. It seems like dirty and gamey play (which it was) but I always pay attention to mine warfare, I always kill MSWs and MLs when I can and I didn't do it on purpose (ie I would sink MSWs anyway, even if he had 60 of them). I think then it dawned to both me any my opponent how little MSWs Japanese have.

Some players complained about this so the "emergency minesweep" rule was intruduced, where DDs, PGs and PCs can sweep a mine or two - and *more importantly* - detect a minefield (minefield, once detected, is much less efficient in damaging ships).

I think it works fine - but if you don't bring a dedicated MSW or ten, don't invade my islands hoping DDs will do [;)]
O.


So instead of giving the Japanese a more appropriate number of Mine Sweeping vessels---2by3 "invents" the 30 knot minesweeper? Wonderful! Overall, the game would probably have been better off had they left mines out of it. Until 1945 when the US started interdicting Japan with them they weren't terribly effective except as a nuisance and in harbor defense,,,, and those area could have been covered in some other means if necessary. I think your "strategy" is interesting, but their reaction to the problem was just a "bandaid". Maybe justifiable for UV...., but carrying it over into WITP (where real minesweeping assets are plentyfull) was sloppy.




Oleg Mastruko -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 6:37:05 AM)

Hemmm, lets not overreact Mike. Most important ability for DDs is NOT the destruction of pitiful mine or two (what's that in a 500-mine field??). It is the ability to *detect* the minefield(s). Detected minefields are much much less dangerous. Note that after "DD Minelover detects minefield" you usually get one of two messages: "DD Minelover hits mine" or "DD Minelover destroys two mines", which, since they detected the minefield, seems reasonable thing to do.

Besides, some DDs did carry paravanes, just their crews were not very proficient or trained in using them as specialised MSW crews were (but since what we have here is called "emergency minesweep" we might imagine they would use them in dire necessity).

"All ships can be minesweepers - once." [:D]

O.




bradfordkay -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 8:00:44 AM)

barnacle bob wrote:" I mine every thing I can! I love mines!"


I guess they give your relatives a place to hang out...






I consider the way WITP handles DD minesweeping a minor flaw in the game. Paravanes were there to use, so DDs should be able to perform the task in a very inefficient manner (highly costly, as well, but absolutely necessary on those occasions that tend to send captains to their cabins for their brown pants). DDs are also able to perform ASW operations at full speed as well, so the problem isn't limited to minesweeping and shore bombardment.




mogami -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 8:06:13 AM)

Hi, Paul Vebber (waiting for him to post here) worked for the USN minewarfare.

Its the old problem. Before DD,PC could detect mines we had the "Hey you don't need a minesweeper to detect mines, detecting them is half the work. Now we have the DD are clearing mines at 30 knts. I think not. I think the TF detects the mines and slows down and DD/PC do not clear a minefield like MSW.

I was on a USN FFG. We had no minesweeping equipment at all. In GW-I my ship (USS Halyburton FFG-40) detected and avoided (and since we were the "low end" of the the "high low mix" we led the TF (The CV USS America CV USS JFK TF) No ship in this TF ever hit a mine. The TF moved normally at 22 knts or better.
The only detection gear employed was the Mark-I eyeball. In daylight we could see submerged mines quite a long way off. If depends alot on seastate. At night you need to really pay attention.




Wallymanowar -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 10:54:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mogami

Hi, Paul Vebber (waiting for him to post here) worked for the USN minewarfare.

Its the old problem. Before DD,PC could detect mines we had the "Hey you don't need a minesweeper to detect mines, detecting them is half the work. Now we have the DD are clearing mines at 30 knts. I think not. I think the TF detects the mines and slows down and DD/PC do not clear a minefield like MSW.

I was on a USN FFG. We had no minesweeping equipment at all. In GW-I my ship (USS Halyburton FFG-40) detected and avoided (and since we were the "low end" of the the "high low mix" we led the TF (The CV USS America CV USS JFK TF) No ship in this TF ever hit a mine. The TF moved normally at 22 knts or better.
The only detection gear employed was the Mark-I eyeball. In daylight we could see submerged mines quite a long way off. If depends alot on seastate. At night you need to really pay attention.


Actually Mog, any ship which has a Sonar is capable of finding Mines. It takes a highly trained sonarman to distinguish but it was possible in those days and is easier today because of the advances in Sonar (side-scan and Bottom scan). Wikipedia gives a good description of the various types of mines and the countermeasures.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_mine

quote:

Mine sweeping
A sweep is either a contact sweep, a simple metal wire dragged through the water by one or two ships to cut the mooring wire of floating mines, or a distance sweep that tries to mimic a ship to get the mines to detonate. The sweeps are dragged by minesweepers, either military ships or converted trawlers. Each run covers between one and two hundred meters, and the ships have to move slowly in a straight line, which makes them very vulnerable to enemy fire. This was most famously exploited by the Turkish army in the Battle of Gallipoli in 1915, when mobile howitzer batteries prevented the British and French from clearing a way through the minefields.

If a contact sweep hits a mine, the wire of the sweep (which is made of high quality steel) rubs against the wire mooring the mine until it is cut. Sometimes "cutters", explosive devices to cut the mine's wire, are used to lessen the strain on the sweeping wire. Any mine cut free is recorded and either collected for research or simply shot with the deck cannon.

Minesweepers can protect themselves by using an oropesa or paravane instead of a second minesweeper. These are torpedo-shaped towed bodies, similar in shape to a Harvey Torpedo, that are streamed from the sweeping vessel thus keeping the sweep at a determined depth and position. Some large warships were routinely equipped with paravane sweeps near the bows in case they inadvertently sailed into minefields — the mine would be deflected towards the paravane by the wire instead of towards the ship by its wake. More recently, heavy-lift helicopters have been employed to drag minesweeping sleds, as in the 1991 Persian Gulf War.


quote:

Mine hunting

Mine hunting is very different from sweeping, even if some minehunters can do both tasks. When mine hunting, the mines are located using sonar, then inspected and destroyed either by divers or ROVs (remote controlled unmanned mini submarines). It is slow, but also the most secure way to remove mines. Mine hunting started during the Second World War, but it was only after the war that it became a truly effective method.





Mike Wood -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 5:59:59 PM)

Hello...

Actually, he wrote two books on the topic for the U.S. Navy. He worked with me, in writing the mine rules. Ad hoc minesweeping operations can only be conducted at low speeds, by the way. The routine checks how many hexes the destroyer has traveled on the turn in question.

Bye...

Michael Wood

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mogami
...Paul Vebber (waiting for him to post here) worked for the USN minewarfare. ..





el cid again -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 7:37:15 PM)

quote:

As for the SPEED of MSWs when conducting operations - the speed of the unit to and from the hex is specified. it is kind of vague how fast units are actually moving when conducting minesweeping ops, however, there probably should be some sort of ops points assessed for minesweeping operations, i think. But lots of stuff doesn't get assessed OPS Points that should in the game - heck, some of the time i notice that ships loading troops aren't assessed OPS points.


You do not understand. Minehunting or minesweeping operations take much more than an entire 12 hour turn. It takes days or weeks to get to the point your fast force can sail through with low risk. Allowing a heavy gun force with a single DMS attached to sail through a minefield with low risk is wholly unrealistic. I got one senior officer (real world) to say "I want some of those ships."




el cid again -> RE: DDs finding and destroying mines? (1/15/2006 7:39:27 PM)

quote:

WITP has air-laid mines, and many players use them. You have to get to a certain date, however.


Which makes what kind of sense? Why cannot inventories of mines that already existed be used? Limit mine supply to historical levels, not the ability to deliver them. And allow minelayers to load mines of the right type in any port that has them of the right nation.




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1