el cid again -> RE: How would German WWII Ac rate to WITP Ac ? (3/1/2006 2:05:35 PM)
|
quote:
Well if I want to be picky I'd say they had unfiforms. Even german, under the US issue. I will stipulate this is correct. What you appear not to understand is that it is not good enough. The THEORY was they were supposed to quickly strip off the US uniforms BEFORE capture. This is a critical legal and moral point: failure to do that should get you shot - and every soldier trained in the conventions knows that. When you decide to wear a disguise (which is a legitimate "ruse of war") it is risky - and AT THE MOMENT COMBAT is about to be joined you are REQUIRED to shed the disguise. Fail to do it, you are a partisan, an irregular, a terrorist - fill in the blank. It is NOT allowed to actually ambush the enemy while wearing his uniforms, for example. You can wear civilian clothes or enemy or neutral uniforms while you MOVE - but NOT while you FIGHT. Get it wrong - you are NOT a POW - and you have NO rights whatever. And this isn't a legalism or technicality - it is necessary. Think about it - HOW can you tell a real soldier from a terrorist? On a battlefield as a soldier - how can you tell? This is the way: he has a uniform of some sort associated with his country. If he does not do that, you must treat him as a civilian (or worse a friendly soldier) - and if he uses that as a way to attack you - he is a dangerous opponant indeed. It is forbidden, and the penalty is death. And any soldier can act on that WITHOUT a trial, or permission, or orders, or anything. I actually did engage an enemy boarding party (enemy because they were boarding a US naval vessel and killing or at least hurting - I could not tell which - US sailors - enemy because they were trying to steal nuclear weapons) which was not in any uniform. I did not care if they were soldiers or sailors or civilian contractors - and I did not make any attempt to find out. We were outnumbered badly - there are 14 men in a naval armed party - it changes name according to function - in this case it was "the ASROC security detail" - and there were over a hundred of them. I called for Marines on the radio and then proceeded to engage in a way that was not too dangerous: use fire moving AWAY from the (explosive) ASROC mounting. We didn't ask questions and no one ever criticized that choice. Civilian clothes or not - we could lawfully shoot them - and in the heat of tactical battle you are not required to accept surrender - nor if badly outnumbered can you safely do so.
|
|
|
|