RE: Join the Thread! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room



Message

Terminus -> RE: Join the Thread! (6/20/2006 6:18:38 PM)

Speedy, Nik and I, thank you very much...



6971grunt -> RE: Thread rules (6/20/2006 7:41:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: niceguy2005


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

Do we need to resort to sabotage on the thread?

Long Live the Anti-Thread. [8D]

Bask in its glory [8D][8D]

Bow down to the Anti-Thread. [&o][&o][&o]

The anti thread will never equal the Thread.



To assert such would, of course, defy the Laws of Physics - the Anti Thread cannot be a Thread and a Thread cannot be an Anti Thread, but that does not make them unequal only distinctively different. [sm=crazy.gif] Quack!



Onime No Kyo -> RE: Thread rules (6/21/2006 12:35:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: grunt6971
To assert such would, of course, defy the Laws of Physics - the Anti Thread cannot be a Thread and a Thread cannot be an Anti Thread, but that does not make them unequal only distinctively different. [sm=crazy.gif] Quack!



"Captain. We have an anti-thread containment breech in progress!"

[image]local://upfiles/11853/FB196E2DC5184FB69761A86251424605.jpg[/image]



Onime No Kyo -> RE: Thread rules (6/25/2006 6:51:35 PM)

OK, what in the heck is wrong with this place? No one posts in the anti-thread? I am disgusted with you people. [:@]



Mark VII -> RE: Thread rules (6/28/2006 9:02:37 PM)

With the help of the "Thread'ers", the anti-thread is now over 200 posts. Thanks!



anarchyintheuk -> RE: Thread rules (6/28/2006 9:55:46 PM)

I believe strongly in the anti-thread cause . . . that and I need to get to 1k posts.



Curty -> RE: Thread rules (7/1/2006 6:08:31 AM)

Gone....



Curty -> RE: Thread rules (7/1/2006 6:08:49 AM)

for....



Curty -> RE: Thread rules (7/1/2006 6:09:03 AM)

a....



Curty -> RE: Thread rules (7/1/2006 6:09:50 AM)

sh**...[sm=Crazy-1271.gif][:D][sm=00000280.gif]



Curty -> RE: Thread rules (7/1/2006 6:10:33 AM)

[sm=00000968.gif]



Mark VII -> Happy Forth (7/4/2006 4:57:09 PM)

The Anti-Thread wishes everyone a happy Forth of July! Especially those men and women who serve or who have served in the armed forces of their respective countries who make our freedoms possible.



scott64 -> RE: Happy Forth (7/4/2006 7:20:52 PM)

[sm=00000028.gif][sm=00000436.gif][sm=00001746.gif][sm=party-smiley-012.gif]



Raverdave -> RE: Happy Forth (7/5/2006 2:15:02 PM)

Anti-thread [8|]  Pffft what a wank !  I've had AARs that have had more hits than this place.



Onime No Kyo -> RE: Happy Forth (7/5/2006 3:55:41 PM)

Thanks for the centiment, buddy. BTW...by supporting the so-called "thread" youre supporting tyranny. <mumble> damn commie </mumble>



Mark VII -> RE: Happy Forth (7/5/2006 5:26:29 PM)

We appreciate your help in helping grow the anti-thread hits Dave!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raverdave

Anti-thread [8|]  Pffft what a wank !  I've had AARs that have had more hits than this place.




RUPD3658 -> RE: Happy Forth (7/5/2006 8:02:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

Thanks for the centiment, buddy. BTW...by supporting the so-called "thread" youre supporting tyranny. <mumble> damn commie </mumble>



The Thread (blessed be it's name) stands for freedom from tyranny. As long as we don't post racy pictures we are free from the mods. [&o]

Therefore the anti-thread is anti-freedom. QED.[:-]



rtrapasso -> RE: Happy Forth (7/5/2006 8:10:33 PM)

[image]local://upfiles/7543/8739ECF989AB4A23A3C353EF643BC994.gif[/image]



BrucePowers -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 12:05:02 AM)

Long live the thread



Mark VII -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 4:19:40 AM)

the Anti-Thread will live for 10,000 years!



Raverdave -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 4:46:09 AM)

Pfft....this thread shall go the same way as snail mail from TN to Oz.[8|]



Dino -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 4:51:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark VII

the Anti-Thread will live for 10,000 years!


Arghhhhhh... No, not another one of those species [sm=Christo_pull_hair.gif]



Raverdave -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 5:00:06 AM)

The fastest way to shut down this aberration is to simply post a pic of a he or she in their birthday suit.......mind you  would also get banned for such a post but I am sure that the true Thread would hail your sacrifice.



Dino -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 5:21:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raverdave

The fastest way to shut down this aberration is to simply post a pic of a he or she in their birthday suit.......mind you would also get banned for such a post but I am sure that the true Thread would hail your sacrifice.


That would be...[8|]...gamey...

Not to mention that it could backfire...



Raverdave -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 5:26:58 AM)

As I said, your sacrifice would be hailed within the halls of the Thread.



Dino -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 5:39:49 AM)

Ah, what the heck... FOR THE GLORY OF THE THREAD!!!

[image][/image]

[image]local://upfiles/18776/46561D75D78E44C98C6828E56B447E88.jpg[/image]



Mark VII -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 4:13:13 PM)

Yo Dino, maybe something not so much like child porn??????? On this side of the pond that is not cool.



Terminus -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 4:54:19 PM)

While I think the picture was in bad taste, it has absolutely nothing to do with anything remotely resembling child pornography...



rtrapasso -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 5:43:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

While I think the picture was in bad taste, it has absolutely nothing to do with anything remotely resembling child pornography...



Just goes to show you how NUTS things have gotten over here. There was an infamous case a few years back where some parents were arrested for child pornography after taking pics of their kids taking baths... [X(] [8|]



Terminus -> RE: Happy Forth (7/7/2006 6:22:16 PM)

Sad...



Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.78125