RE: Who wants to fly this (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich



Message


BigDuke66 -> RE: Who wants to fly this (9/25/2006 3:08:11 AM)

No beautiful German Fräulein?[:D]




SMK-at-work -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/2/2006 1:22:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge

Yuck



[image]local://upfiles/1438/8D192B59754C40DCB4358CA245585D0F.jpg[/image]


Skua and Roc memories: http://freespace.virgin.net/john.dell/Memories.htm

Well worth the read!




Dixie -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/2/2006 7:42:11 PM)

Can I have this?

[image]local://upfiles/20142/A100358A1AA848BEA3C4B5C90C57F29B.jpg[/image]




Hard Sarge -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/2/2006 9:43:25 PM)

if it is a Spitfire, it should be in the Game already

[:-]




BigDuke66 -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/3/2006 3:45:18 AM)

Will there be already some "Wunderwaffen" in the game database or only the stuff that is really used by the campaign?

Will there be enough slots for new planes, weapons, etc. to make well lets say a 1946 scenario?

Will the engine be able to handle things like SAMs and AAMs?




Hard Sarge -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/3/2006 4:07:11 AM)

some of that is easy and some of it is HARD to explain

if I can work out the details, I can add almost anything I want, and we got enough slots that we could go forward or backward in time

so, wonderweapons could be added, if and when (I love the idea of the Recon plane Von Braum was working on, and offered the high command(a V-2 with wings a cockpit and landing gear, the High command turned it down as it was to good !))

(plus some of the models that most people laff at, when you read the specs and the thinking behind them, they start to make more sense, and overall, all that was needed was more time to work out the details, the selflaunchers for the Natter was very impressive)

the questions is getting things that were or could of been, into the game (The 163 nevered worked the way it should in the game, and most of the others we could add in, would not work either, but just be there)

some of the other stuff, we need to get the programmers some time to look at it and work out how to get it in






BigDuke66 -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/3/2006 2:31:08 PM)

What was/is the problem with the 163?




Hard Sarge -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/3/2006 3:17:02 PM)

well, basicly, the AI does not want to launch them, I believe it is something with how the game works out who and what to intercept with

what triggers the AI to put planes into the air

overall, I would say, the trigger set up, is for Area Defence, and the 163 is pure point defence




Howard Mitchell -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/4/2006 7:47:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dixie

Can I have this?

[image]local://upfiles/20142/A100358A1AA848BEA3C4B5C90C57F29B.jpg[/image]


I want one of these...

[image]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v677/Mr_Nakajima/Victor.jpg[/image]

...one of the few strategic bombers which looks like it comes from Thunderbirds.




Justascratch -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/4/2006 8:17:57 PM)

Now that's cool! I want one too.




Hard Sarge -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/4/2006 9:32:17 PM)

don't know if  I want the plane or not, but I like the nose art




Justascratch -> RE: Who wants to fly this (10/5/2006 4:50:47 PM)

I have my eight year old daughter working on the pilot & copilot marionettes already!




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.339844