US Marines rule ground combat (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945



Message


Kapten Q -> US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 12:14:07 PM)

Just browsed the database editor and came across this:

USMC rifle squad 12/41 Antisoft 28 Antiarmor 15

USMC rifle squad 12/42 Antisoft 42 [X(] Antiarmor 55

No other infantry type even comes close and the japanese is stuck in around the 25-28 range depending on year. The chinese suck until 12/43.

Makes the USMC excellent atoll killers in mid 43 I should think.

Q




Onime No Kyo -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 2:15:52 PM)

Bah....Allied-fanboyism!!!!! [:@][:@][:D]




Andy Mac -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 2:49:41 PM)

Just a reference to the embedded small arms in USMC squads

Australians are also good compared to UK/Indian etc as they have extra automatic weapons.





m10bob -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 5:42:19 PM)

FWIW, historically, this is when the Gyrenes doubled the amount of squad level BAR's, started adding Garands (or Johnson rifles) to the squads, and Thompson SMG's..
The Japanese NEVER uniformly fielded squad level auto-rifles, nor SMG's, (Only their Para units used them by TOE, a piece that looked and operated like a Bergmann).
The Gyrene's also used 12Ga shotguns and as the war progressed, used flamethrowers very prolifically.
For details on these weapons and TOE's, suggest seeing either KG Erwin's excellent TOE work,USMC specific, for SPWAW (in the Matrix forums), or Flashfyre's work on same.. Both have their stuff together (IMHO)..
Later in the Pacific War, the USMC pilots became the best ground support planes in the history of aerial warfare, and have remained so till this day, (the Gyrene pilots' philosophy is that they should be "down there" side by side with the grunts on the ground, so they fly pretty slow and low before delivery......)
***No, I am not a Gyrene, but I recognise their qualities, nuff said.**[8D]




Terminus -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 5:48:03 PM)

Completely inappropriate to whine about fanboyism here; late-war USMC squad bristled with all sorts of firepower. I've got no problems with those ratings.




Big B -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 5:59:08 PM)

USMC rifle squads per division are also too low at 299. I'm pretty sure USMC Divisions were larger than standard Army Divisions (which varied through out the war but were around 14,500 men per division).

If I recall correctly, US Army Inf Div has (in WitP) 364 rifle squads per full strength Division. However USMC rifle companies were larger than their US Army counterparts - around the order of about 240 men for a USMC rifle company as opposed to about 180 men in a US Army rifle company.

So doing the math - a full strength USMC Inf Div ought to be well over 400 squads.

B




Sardaukar -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 6:16:06 PM)

Were USMC squads larger ? That is, contained more men than Army ones ?




m10bob -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 6:23:10 PM)

Depends on the year, because the Marines went to "fire teams", created to deal with specific battlefield situations.
The individual platoon could have squad size teams, or several..
By 1944, fire teams were usually 4-6 men each, (less than a squad), but co-ordinated to work as teams within teams.




Sardaukar -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 6:25:35 PM)

Hmmm...I know that USMC stardardized the 13-man squad in 1944. What was Army squad size then ?




Big B -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 6:32:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Were USMC squads larger ? That is, contained more men than Army ones ?


quote:

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Depends on the year, because the Marines went to "fire teams", created to deal with specific battlefield situations.
The individual platoon could have squad size teams, or several..
By 1944, fire teams were usually 4-6 men each, (less than a squad), but co-ordinated to work as teams within teams.


USMC went to fire teams later in the war - true. But their squads became officially organized (by 1945) as three x four man fire teams (1x BAR and three M-1 Garands each) so they stayed around 12 or 13 men per squad, not unlike the US Army.
However, for special missions or units - like Raider BNs, squad size and composition varied widely.

B




m10bob -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 6:38:58 PM)

Generally, the same, but something else to note about Army divisions (as touched on above), is that while the U.S.Army in the ETO were built around regimental combat teams, with their own inherent armor and artillery, the U.S.Army divisions in PTO were not,usually, but the Marine divisions were, and did have their own armor, arty, engineers,etc, as part of the divisional TOE, (which explains the larger size of Marine divisions).
Generally Army squads had a single BAR and the rest carried rifles, but in combat, this might change as situation warranted, whereas Marine squads beefed up with auto weapons by TOE, not situation.
The Marines were more prone to alter tactics and tactical doctrine at a lower level, than the Army....




crsutton -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 8:24:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Big B

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Were USMC squads larger ? That is, contained more men than Army ones ?


quote:

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Depends on the year, because the Marines went to "fire teams", created to deal with specific battlefield situations.
The individual platoon could have squad size teams, or several..
By 1944, fire teams were usually 4-6 men each, (less than a squad), but co-ordinated to work as teams within teams.


USMC went to fire teams later in the war - true. But their squads became officially organized (by 1945) as three x four man fire teams (1x BAR and three M-1 Garands each) so they stayed around 12 or 13 men per squad, not unlike the US Army.
However, for special missions or units - like Raider BNs, squad size and composition varied widely.

B


12 Men-in Europe. I suppose it was the same in PTO...

Sorry, meant to quote the previous post on US army squad size in 1944




Andy Mac -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 8:59:55 PM)

Add up combat engineers and rifle squads and marines are larger than US Army Divs.

about 25% of the manpower in USMC Divs are combat engineer sqds thats why they are sooo dangerous and usefull in late war assaults on fortified atolls




Big B -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/16/2006 9:29:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

Add up combat engineers and rifle squads and marines are larger than US Army Divs.

about 25% of the manpower in USMC Divs are combat engineer sqds thats why they are sooo dangerous and usefull in late war assaults on fortified atolls

Yes, but regardless of that - their organic rifle companies are still about 25% larger.

B

EDIT:
On TO&E differences between US Army and USMC by 1945
No matter how you slice it - USMC Divs in WitP should not have LESS infantry than Army Divs..

From http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_okinawa1.html

While there are some superficial similarities between the organisation of US Army and Marine Corps divisions, they are in reality quite different from one another. Neither of them can really be considered superior to the other as they both conducted amphibious operations, both fought the same enemy on the same terrain over the same period of time. Although the Marine division is specifically designed for such operations, the US Army division is easily tailored for the task. By 1945, Army divisions were somewhat smaller than Marine divisions in their basic size (14,000 vs. 19,000) but were better equipped in certain categories of weapons. Reinforced, the difference narrowed slightly as Army divisions grew to 22,000 and Marine divisions grew to 26,000 with supporting units.

..snip..

The infantry regiments of both differed considerably although they used the same sort of equipment. Both the Army and the Marines used the 'triangular' structure - each regiment had three battalions, each of three rifle companies, each of three rifle platoons, each of three rifle squads. But it was there that any similarity ended. Army regimental strength was listed as 3,068 but on Okinawa started around 300 men below authorised strength. The regimental cannon company had six 105mm M7 self-propelled guns that made excellent assault guns for blasting caves and pillboxes, while the antitank company had nine 3.7cm M3A1 guns. The infantry battalion numbered some 860 personnel with a headquarters company and a heavy weapons company equipped with eight .30cal M1917A1 water-cooled machineguns and six 81mm M1 mortars. Each rifle company had some 193 personnel in three rifle platoons, each of three rifle squads, each with twelve men equipped with a Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR) M1918A2, eleven M1 Garand rifles and one M7 rifle grenade launcher. The company's weapons platoon had two .30cal M1919A4 air-cooled machineguns and three 60mm M2 mortars. A number of 2.36in M9 rocket launchers (bazookas) and M2-2 flamethrowers were also available.

The Army infantry regiment actually changed very little during the course of the Second World War, whereas the Marine infantry regiment (and indeed the division) underwent almost continuous evolution. By the time of Operation Iceberg, the divisions were still technically operating under the May 1944 Table of Organisation and Equipment (TO&E) but the regiments (each of 3,400 personnel) had reorganised under the 1 May 1945 TO&E that had been implemented early. The regimental weapons company consisted of two antitank platoons with four 3.7cm guns each and a self-propelled howitzer platoon of four 105mm M7s. The regimental headquarters included a scout and sniper platoon (43 men). There was no longer a separate weapons company in every infantry battalion (each of 996 men) - it had been disbanded and its weapons shared between the units that tended to make use of them. The battalion headquarters company had been given a mortar platoon with four 81mm mortars and an assault platoon (of fifty-five men) with three assault sections (each of two seven-man squads with a flamethrower, a 2.36in bazooka and demolition men) that would support each company. Each rifle company consisted of 242 men with three rifle platoons, a headquarters (fifty-one men) that had a section of three 60mm mortars and a machinegun platoon (forty-six men) that had eight .30cal air-cooled and six .30cal water-cooled machineguns. Each rifle platoon had 45 men in a headquarters and three thirteen-man rifle squads, each squad having a squad leader (M1 carbine), and three four-man fire teams with a team leader (M1 rifle, M7 grenade launcher), rifleman (M1 rifle), automatic rifleman (BAR) and assistant automatic rifleman (M1 rifle, M7 grenade launcher). The fire team concept had evolved from the Marine Corps involvement in the Banana Wars of the 1920s and 1930s with each team being built around an automatic weapon. It was a great success and eventually exported to many other armed forces.




Sardaukar -> RE: US Marines rule ground combat (5/17/2006 3:50:19 PM)

Goog info! I thought that organic "combat manpower" was about 25% higher in USMC division than in Army one. Makes sense since tasks were different.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.84375