A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room



Message

John 3rd -> A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 7:10:46 PM)

Hello Forum!

I am in February 1943 with Wolfpack and I have my Jacks rolling off the assembly line (couple months early!) and am contemplating the difference between M5 and M5c? Doesn't seem like much. I want to try to produce it a little early and upgrade my CVs Zeros. Which might be better?




Mike Solli -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 7:29:47 PM)

Use the c variant. That's the carrier capable one. The A6M5 is strictly land based.



John 3rd -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 7:48:30 PM)

DUH!  Should have known/noticed that...

THANKS!



Mike Solli -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 7:50:18 PM)

What are the ranges for those two planes?

(Just some long term plannng. I don't have the A6M3a yet. [:D])



fabertong -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 8:13:42 PM)

IIRC>>>>>I think you can't upgrade the 2, 3, or 3c to the 5c.....you only can fill out 5c sqdrns as they arrive........so better concentrate of the 5........



Mynok -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 8:15:57 PM)


Umm......IIRC the 5c model is a fighter bomber not a fighter.



Mike Solli -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 8:16:59 PM)

Uh oh. I may be wrong then. Gotta check this out.[:(]



fabertong -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 8:17:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Umm......IIRC the 5c model is a fighter bomber not a fighter.


Hence the 2,3, and 3c not upgrading to it.....



aletoledo -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 11:56:14 PM)

I seem to recall the 5c being a fighter bomber also.

I just started receiving the 5 and I had them stationed on a carrier just fine. the only thing is the range is 5/6 IIRC, but thats fine for carrier operations.



John 3rd -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/14/2006 11:56:34 PM)

What is the final answer here?  Is it the CV Model or a FB?  When I get home, I will get out a book and see if I can find out as well...




invernomuto -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/15/2006 12:07:34 AM)

The A6M5 is a fighter (carrier capable), A6M5c is the fighter bomber version.

Bye



Nikademus -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/15/2006 12:15:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

What is the final answer here?  Is it the CV Model or a FB?  When I get home, I will get out a book and see if I can find out as well...




He was confusing the A6M3 and A6M3a combo with the A6M5 version. The A6M5c is the fighter bomber version. Better Dur and firepower at the cost of reduced MVR



Mike Solli -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/15/2006 12:19:26 AM)

So, what are you trying to say Nik? I'm always confused?[:D] Some friend you are. [:'(]



Mynok -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/15/2006 12:28:02 AM)


Bunnies are not your friends...... [:D]



Mike Solli -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/15/2006 12:29:55 AM)

Boy, ain't that the truth. [:D]



Onime No Kyo -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/21/2006 12:40:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Bunnies are not your friends...... [:D]



I think they get rather too friendly in some instances. Instances which you probably want to avoid. [sm=00000055.gif]



Nikademus -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/21/2006 6:55:50 PM)

Throttling of love........

ack oop....<choke!>



castor troy -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/21/2006 8:14:37 PM)

Only the A6M5 can be used as fighters in your carrier daitais. The A6M5 is a fighter bomber.



dtravel -> RE: A6M5 vs. A6M5c? (6/21/2006 8:27:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

Only the A6M5 can be used as fighters in your carrier daitais. The A6M5 is a fighter bomber.


Ummmm....



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.0625