Elvis -> (7/21/2000 9:16:00 AM)
|
<<< Right, very unlikely. But not nearly as impossible as some may think. >>>
I never said it was impossible, in fact, "extreme range" kills with a pistol are entirely possible, but I don't think we need to elaborate on ballistics.
The point I was trying to make, and still support, is that having a range of 2 for pistols detracts from the reality of the game.
The simple fact of the matter is that "extreme range" (greater than 15 yards) exchanges of pistol fire resulting in casualties were not a common occurrence. Did they happen? Of course.
Unfortunately, this is a game - a closed system - not real life. I don't think that the game engine tracks each individual small arms round through the course of its ballistic arc.
That being said, the chance of an "extreme range" kill within the game is much more likely than in real life, as the number of variables affecting the flight of the round are infinitely less.
Having 12 years of practical experience with infantry small arms, and having carried a pistol for 7, I feel safe saying that 100 meter kills with a pistol should be an exception, rather than the norm. Like I stated in an earlier post, firing on the range is one thing - trying to fire at a moving target with your adrenaline flowing is another - especially at the ranges you seem to find reasonable.
Unfortunately, this happens all too often, and in multiple scenarios. The odds of it happening within the game engine are just too high.
If anyone out there who has fired a pistol in combat can definitely prove that 50-100 meter kills were a common occurrence, please prove me wrong.
Until then, the range needs to be changed to 1...
------------------
alea iacta est
[email]sooperduk@hotmail.com[/email]
|
|
|
|