opinions on this (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> PureSim Baseball



Message

rowech -> opinions on this (7/9/2006 4:39:52 PM)

What year is a good year to start with for a historical league? 1901? 1920? 1946? 1962? 1977?

Anybody have a favorite starting point?



Dunk44 -> RE: opinions on this (7/9/2006 6:07:40 PM)

Really depends on what your looking for. My favorite thing to do is to rebuild some of the worst teams in history. Taking over the '27 Yankees isn't fun for me.




rwd59 -> RE: opinions on this (7/9/2006 7:49:39 PM)

Pre-60's doesn't do much for me. Start in 1962 and take over the Mets if you want a challenge.



Tanaka -> RE: opinions on this (7/9/2006 10:41:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rowech

What year is a good year to start with for a historical league? 1901? 1920? 1946? 1962? 1977?

Anybody have a favorite starting point?


Definitely 1946!



Nukester -> RE: opinions on this (7/9/2006 11:03:25 PM)

I always start in 1903, if only because leagues dont change much after that for a long time (excpet a few name changes). Only thing is, in 1904 the schedule went from 140 games to 154 games



33sherman -> RE: opinions on this (7/9/2006 11:15:59 PM)

I also start in 1903, for the same reasons (easy expansion). In 1901 you get that anomalous Brewers' team. You chop a couple years off Christy Mathewson's career, but you get all of Ty Cobb, Tris Speaker, etc. The fictional players fizzle out after a few years and it's all historical.



DandricSturm -> RE: opinions on this (7/9/2006 11:17:24 PM)

Often mentioned in this type of thread is 1951. Mantle and Mays.



Claymore Cut -> RE: opinions on this (7/10/2006 9:58:47 AM)

If you want one of the worst teams in history, the 62' mets are a must!



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.59375