RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units

RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames

Message

po8crg -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/8/2007 10:49:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets 3rd and last in the series. [image]local://upfiles/16701/5293E3E1A34B452FBD929BDBD986E253.jpg[/image] I didn't think that Kaga and Akagi participated in the attack on Pearl; I thought it was just Shokaku, Zuikaku, Soryu and Hiryu. Am I wrong?

Froonp -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/8/2007 11:06:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: po8crg I didn't think that Kaga and Akagi participated in the attack on Pearl; I thought it was just Shokaku, Zuikaku, Soryu and Hiryu. Am I wrong? Yes, you are. All 6 were at Pearl Harbor.

Jimm -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/9/2007 2:10:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freeboy ok, so you are saying that they are vulnerable only if moved? that is not logical! or maybe it has to do with the phases.. boy I hate that word, why not stages? anyway.. interesting, maybe I will read the manual... will the computerized version manual be different? seems it would have to be? Freeboy, I would recommend having a look at the manual, its not an immediately easy game to pick up the ideas of. I think the point to note is that its a very strategic level game so that an awful lot of action is boiled down to a small number of rolls. But even within one step of one impulse within a turn (ie perhaps a period of a few days in real terms) quite long intense and detailed battles can be depicted. Steve, I think this illustrates that you would be advised to get the tutorials proof read by people who dont know Wif to get some really meaningful information on how useful they are.

Jimm -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/9/2007 2:27:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IrishDragoonGuards I dont know if this is VIP or even mentioned before but I was thinking about this the other day .. As I remember the Naval CRT .. the ability of 1 or 2 ships to damage the enemy rises or falls by the amount of enemy ships present in a battle . While I really think the mechanics of Naval battles is great .. always has been .. I can't help but think maybe what ADG did was start with a baseline and go from there .. As I think about this more I have come to the conclusion ... That .. not only do ships have a range and speed factor ... but I think it should be taken into account that a CA or CL against a BB or BC will not have the initiative and the BB or BC will shoot first because of the range of guns .. I would hope that this is looked into .. As I have said I was thinking about this the other day .. from what I remember that is .. IDG There is a lot of the background to the naval system described in the original Ships in Flames supplement, (which is actually pre Final Edition so not very useful now but still quite interesting). A great deal of thinking went into boiling a huge amount of ship stats into four or five figures on each individual naval unit. Surface attack factors took into account number & calibre of guns, rate of fire (inversely proportional, so 10x 11" guns with smaller shells and higher rate of fire approximately same effect as 8x12" guns), ship speed & manoueverability, fire control, radar etc. Range of gunnery was taken into account as was even things like potential angle of shell impact... Defence was also detailed, looking at amount and location of armour plate both horizontal and vertical, again ship speed, propensity to explode at the first sight of the enemy (HMS Hood) So to answer your query, yes range and tactical speed are taken into account of within the ship factors.

michaelbaldur -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/9/2007 4:44:53 AM)
1.....I think that it is wrong too say that a 6 turn BB takes 12 turns to build ........ when it taken 13 turns .....6 turns + 1 turn in the construction pool + 6 turns .... 13 turns ..... it is importen for production planning ..... eks.. if you need the amph in nov/dec 41 when it is summer i north monsum.... it is importen that you know that you have to start them 9 turns before not 8 turns ....... just my point..... 2....the tutorial is great ..... but I think that the transport/invasion page is to simpel .... there is 3 rules ......... normal + the scs option + the amph option .... it is vital rules ..... maybe 2 pages.... but steve REALY nice job [:)][:)][:)]

Froonp -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/9/2007 7:46:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur 1.....I think that it is wrong too say that a 6 turn BB takes 12 turns to build ........ when it taken 13 turns .....6 turns + 1 turn in the construction pool + 6 turns .... 13 turns ..... it is importen for production planning ..... eks.. if you need the amph in nov/dec 41 when it is summer i north monsum.... it is importen that you know that you have to start them 9 turns before not 8 turns ....... just my point..... It's 12 turns, because the ship does not stay 1 turn in the Construction Pool. It enter this Pool at the reinforcement stage, which is at the start of the 6th turn of its construction, and can be put into second cycle during the production stage which is at the end of this same 6th turn.

michaelbaldur -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/9/2007 9:10:38 AM)
you are right...... I counted wrong ......

michaelbaldur -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/9/2007 9:16:16 AM)
but the point of more turorial about transport/invasions is still importent

Froonp -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/9/2007 9:28:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur but the point of more turorial about transport/invasions is still importent Maybe include the diagram I made in the thread about Naval Transports (http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1491440)

michaelbaldur -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/9/2007 9:50:58 AM)
yes ..... but maybe another tutorial ...... an advanced combat .... .invasions shorebombardmnet... weather ....notorial ....advanced naval combat

Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/9/2007 10:53:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur yes ..... but maybe another tutorial ...... an advanced combat .... .invasions shorebombardmnet... weather ....notorial ....advanced naval combat Yes. The tutorial on naval units (#5) is just to introduce them to the reader. Moving naval units wasn't covered in much detail and combat not at all. My intent is to have the tutorials layer the knowledge. By that I mean to give vague hints about stuff early (e.g., invasions) and later cover it in more detail. Somewhere I explained this earlier. The idea is to not try to cover everything in perfect detail at the first go, but to let the reader acquire a firm foundation of the basics and then build upon that with more information/knowledge later.

Zorachus99 -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/10/2007 6:37:12 AM)
I strongly recommend one of Patrice's excellent sequence of naval movement possibilities as a tutuorial. [&o] 1) Moving from port to port to sea (illustrates the concept). 2) Port to land (land movement illustration) 3) Port to Land movement to Paradrop (include an example of paratroop combat against a 1 pt notional unit from an in supply hex?) It's the most extreme example, all other movements are variations on this action.

dale1066 -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/10/2007 9:35:49 AM)
This sort of relates to AI as well as tutorials Optimal strategies for resolving damage from naval combat ? will the AI have a simple fixed one say cruisers then BBs then CVs or will a more subtle strategy be applied? will this be country/current strategy dependant? eg CW can afford to take more losses if it means sending the expensive and slow to rebuild italian navy to the bottom of the med

Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/10/2007 11:07:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Zorachus99 I strongly recommend one of Patrice's excellent sequence of naval movement possibilities as a tutuorial.� [&o] 1) Moving from port to port to sea (illustrates the concept). 2) Port to land (land movement illustration) 3) Port to Land movement to Paradrop (include an example of paratroop combat against a 1 pt notional unit from an in supply hex?) It's the� most extreme example, all other movements are variations on this action. Yes. I want this to be an 'Interactive' tutorial. Right now I am unsure how those will work. The main idea is to enable the player/learner to pick up a unit and move it. Writing code explicitly to enable this is unattractive; I would prefer to use the 'regular' code . On the other hand, the standard code has a lot of other stuff that is possible and I don't want the player wandering off to try a bunch of unusual things. How much control to exert versus how much freedom to permit is the question (sort of like raising kids I guess).

Fred98 -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/10/2007 1:35:13 PM)
I have never played the game. Tonight I looked at the first post in this thread. I see that the movement points and the range are 2 of the variables on the counters. I would have thought both figures are redundent. Click on unit. The hexes it can move to remain normal colour the hexes it cannot move to are darkened. What is the purposse of the movement points and the range?

Neilster -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/10/2007 4:41:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Joe 98 I have never played the game. Tonight I looked at the first post in this thread. I see that the movement points and the range are 2 of the variables on the counters. I would have thought both figures are redundent. Click on unit. The hexes it can move to remain normal colour the hexes it cannot move to are darkened. What is the purposse of the movement points and the range? They're a holdover from the board game and have a sentimental appeal for me as a result. They're still handy because they give an indication of movement potential at a glance, without having to click on the unit. Cheers, Neilster

Froonp -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/10/2007 6:14:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Joe 98 I have never played the game. Tonight I looked at the first post in this thread.� I see that the movement points and the range are 2 of the variables on the counters. I would have thought both figures are redundent. Click on unit.� The hexes it can move to remain normal colour the hexes it cannot move to are darkened. What is the purposse of the movement points and the range? The range is how far the unit can travel, and the speed is, given how far it has travelled, how efficient is it at patrolling the sea area it is in. As Neilster said, they give an indication of movement (and I'd add 'Combat') potential at a glance, without having to click on the unit, and this is very good once you're used to it.

Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/10/2007 8:40:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Joe 98 I have never played the game. Tonight I looked at the first post in this thread.� I see that the movement points and the range are 2 of the variables on the counters. I would have thought both figures are redundent. Click on unit.� The hexes it can move to remain normal colour the hexes it cannot move to are darkened. What is the purposse of the movement points and the range? Sea areas are very large so a naval unit that can move 4 sea areas could start in Plymouth and be moved to the Eastern Mediterranean. Highlighting possible sea area moves isn't very helpful because you would have to be zoomed way out to see all the possible moves. The range and movement point for the naval units is an awkward system. I would have preferred the terms range and patrol bonus, where the patrol bonus is the movement points - range. [The movement points are always equal to or greater than the range.] In practice a naval unit can move as many sea areas as its range. Once it arrives in a sea area, its ability to patrol the area is determined by which sea box section it occupies. And its choice of sea box sections is limited by its unused range + the patrol bonus. WIF uses the terms range and movement points with the choice of sea box section limited by the unit's unused movement points. This is another reason why simply highlighting sea areas the unit can reach is incomplete information. Instead it would be better to highlight the sea section boxes the unit can occupy. Still, these would be spread out over a large area of the map and only visilble in their entirety if the zoom level were very small.

composer99 -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/10/2007 8:54:26 PM)
WiF and MWiF do not use hex-based movement for naval units or for aircraft patrolling at sea. Instead, they use a combination of sea areas and, within each area, sea boxes. Sea areas are used for strategic naval movement, and sea boxes for tactical operations (namely, combat, but also invasions). A naval unit's range tells you how many sea areas it can move through during a naval move. It's movement tells you how far up the sea box (from 0 to 4) it can go once it gets there. Moving through a sea area or port costs 1 range & 1 movement. Moving up a box costs 1 movement. With the combination of moving through and into sea areas & ports, and then moving through sea boxes when in a sea area, highlighting potential destinations would probably get a little cumbersome. Until you've manipulated a few naval units making naval moves, it's hard to get a feel for how it works. I suspect this explanation may have you getting a little [>:]. Goodness knows that's what I'm doing writing it. [:)]

Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/10/2007 10:34:33 PM)
A short answer for naval range and movement points is that big numbers are good and small numbers are bad.

Mziln -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/11/2007 1:41:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: composer99 WiF and MWiF do not use hex-based movement for naval units or for aircraft patrolling at sea. Not bad, but you forgot about LND's which can use a coronation of hex and hex dot movement to determine which section of sea box they can be placed in. quote: 11.3 Naval air missions How to fly a naval air mission To fly a naval air mission into a sea area, fly the aircraft from its base to any hex-dot in a sea area. Put the aircraft into a section of the sea-box in that sea area. If it has no movement points left after flying to the hex dot, it can only go into the 0 section. If it has 1 unused point, it can go into either the 0 or the 1 section. If it has 3 points left (i.e. 1+2), it can go into the 0, 1 or 2 section. If it has 6 points left (i.e. 1+2+3), it can go into the 0, 1, 2 or 3 section. And, if it has 10 or more points left it can go into any section. quote: 14.4.1 Carrier plane units (CVPiF & SiF option 56) Carrier planes as aircraft A carrier plane can fly a mission from a hex just like any other aircraft. Treat it as a FTR if it flew as a fighter and as a LND if it flew as a bomber. If it hasn�t yet decided its role (i.e. it is in a sea area), it has the effects of a LND.

Zorachus99 -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/11/2007 3:55:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets I would have preferred the terms range and patrol bonus, where the patrol bonus is the movement points - range. [The movement points are always equal to or greater than the range.] I like this very much. The patrol bonus refers to the time and activity level the ship can perform at in the sea area before returning to base. Changing wording at this point is probably beyond the effort; but kudos to you for using language that more succinctly phrases the action.

composer99 -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (7/12/2007 12:15:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mziln Not bad, but you forgot about LND's which can use a coronation of hex and hex dot movement to determine which section of sea box they can be placed in. But think of the poor newbie! [;)] Naval movement is a big enough subject on its own without adding in naval air movement as well. That would probably have its own tutorial in any case, and the two concepts would meet in that space where naval and air units interact the most: in battle (aka the Naval Combat Tutorial)! [sm=duel.gif]

Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Tutorial #5 - Naval Units (1/21/2008 1:08:22 AM)
Here is a new page (it goes last) for the naval units tutorial. In RAW this is section 28. [image]local://upfiles/16701/62069C042E9A49DC98B8B749B665F155.jpg[/image]

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.828125