DEB -> RE: IJN questions (12/5/2006 10:50:34 PM)
|
Ralf, Further to Miller's answers: 1) If you have a Nell unit set to Naval Search (even at a low %) op losses will easily eat up this 4 a month. All of your Nell units are strictly "one shot" weapons which once depleted will never be replenished. Nell production ceased when Betty production started ( 1941 ), hence low replacement rate. 2) Never seen that before.....In my last game as the IJN the replacements came through for this single Judy unit, albiet starting in November 43 which is way to late to matter. 589 Judy's built between 4/43 & 3/44 therefore replacements at 11/43 seems later than they could be. If only one reinforcement unit though, the priorities are elsewhere, including upgrades for Vals. 3) I agree. Why have a unit in the game that will never recieve any replacements! Would you rather not have the unit? The A6M5 Zeke (last period upgrade of the Zero), was received by front line units in the Autumn of 43. I am therefore not suprised at the lack of Zeke replacements, bearing in mind the details advised above re Judy replacements. 4) WITP only I am afraid. Units upgrade automatically once enough replacement planes of the new type are in the pool. At this level of command control it is to be expected. 5) Yes the IJN are short of base forces, but I believe this is realistic. Very. I would suggest that as you capture new bases/airfields, you abandon those to your rear. Not completely you understand, just move out the Aircraft & Pilots & Support and leave garrison troops to guard the facilities, in case you have to retreat/retire to them or defend them in the future. Applies to the Allies too, but not so much. 6) The rate that ships gain system damage through normal ops is over-estimated and is toned down for WITP. In UV, IJN battleships can gain 10 sys damage in the course of one bombardment mission, which is unrealistc. At first sight this seems unrealistic; however, as both sides kept their Battleships in "reserve" most of the time in this theatre, this may be a "ploy" to force you to restict their usage.
|
|
|
|