Michael104 -> RE: Which Database are you supposed to use? (1/6/2007 9:03:23 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: VCDH quote:
ORIGINAL: HercMighty Sorry I missed the disclaimer: "Own Scenario development maybe needed for satisfactory game experience." And why not? There have been other users that make their own scenarios. To be brutally honest there is no onus on anyone to make scenarios, but since there are a large number of them floating about, then I think there's something to be said for making them don't you think? We don't have a problem supplying scenarios, indeed we're going to have a new set using the HUD3. But the sole reason this community sustained itself during the dark ages was because of the DBs and scenarios that the community made. I always like to say that you can be either part of the problem, part of the solution or part of the landscape. If you think that the existing hundreds of scenarios are lacking, or aren't enough then make one and add to the cause. Start small, we'll give you all the help you need. EVERYONE will. Later D On the Matrix website purchase page (shopping cart) I found the following feature list: Game Features Most accurate naval simulation available to the public Multiplayer Suport for up to 6 Players Spectator mode for Multiplayer Support for VCR record and playback Over 120 pre-built scenarios * Tutorials: 8 * Cold War Battleset: 15 * Global Conflicts 1: 15 * Global Conflicts 2: 15 * Global Conflicts 3: 15 * Regional Conflicts 1: 15 * Regional Conflicts 2: 22 * WestPac Battleset: 15 After-Action Log 3rd Party Databases Scenario editors Support for Player databases and scenarios ... and many more! To be honest I think that places the onus on Matrix to make the initial 120 scenarios playable/compliant, especially 6 months after game release. I suggest editing the features list to prevent future buyers from having elevated expectations. Michael
|
|
|
|