Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II

Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion

Message

Neilster -> Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/27/2007 12:06:09 PM)
I personally liked the look of the YF-23 more than the YF-22. There's a decent argument to be made that it should have been selected too but it's a complicated topic. AFAIK, a strike/bomber version (admittedly quite different) might get built after all. Here are some nice piccies anyway. Cheers, Neilster [image]local://upfiles/10515/79E4C79B98C8495A92822913111971F7.gif[/image] [image]local://upfiles/10515/8262480959A64B24B9F4915B1C8D2EC6.jpg[/image] [image]local://upfiles/10515/528062CB0590490FB0A1594540032A42.jpg[/image]

Terminus -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/27/2007 12:36:42 PM)
Much better looking aircraft, that's for sure...

AlvinS -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/27/2007 4:02:51 PM)
The YF-23 was built by McDonnell Douglas. I was crushed when we lost the competition. It is a beautiful aircraft.

Terminus -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/27/2007 4:25:16 PM)
I remember a friend of mine's first comment when he saw the F-22: "It looks like a speed boat!" The F-23 really looks the business.

Neilster -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/27/2007 5:04:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AlvinS The YF-23 was built by McDonnell Douglas. I was crushed when we lost the competition. It is a beautiful aircraft. That must really hurt. To be involved in a long, complicated project, requiring dedication, tough decisions, secrecy, hard work, sacrifice, that's potentially worth billions and that could last for decades; it would be impossible not to get emotionally involved. Jeez, I can remember being disappointed with the decision from far away Tasmania, with no real connection at all. That sleek manta-ray incorporated many a hope and dream. An alternative history flight sim featuring the F/A-23 would be cool. I'd buy it. The F/A-23 would look even better with 15 years of development (gold canopy coating etc). Cheers, Neilster

chief -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/27/2007 8:38:22 PM)
AlvinS: If you work for Lockheed you may remember this slogan as printed on a Flight Engineers slide rule. "L2LFLL2DFA" [&:] Translation....."Look to Lockheed for Leadership, Look to Douglas for Aircraft", that bird above proves the formula[:D]

Terminus -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/27/2007 10:14:36 PM)
Hah![:D]

Arctic Blast -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/28/2007 12:57:00 AM)
It seems like there are a few too many aircraft currently being produced. I mean, the F22 is coming online, there's talk of a strike YF23, and yet the F35 JSF starts being built next year. Wouldn't it make more sense to just pick one plane? Anyway, enough of my judgments...it is a really nice looking aircraft.

Neilster -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/28/2007 3:17:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Arctic Blast It seems like there are a few too many aircraft currently being produced. I mean, the F22 is coming online, there's talk of a strike YF23, and yet the F35 JSF starts being built next year. Wouldn't it make more sense to just pick one plane? Anyway, enough of my judgments...it is a really nice looking aircraft. It's all caught up in politics, changing needs, changing technology and the seemingly inevitable cost escalation of military projects. Originally, the ATF (for which the F-22 was selected) was going to be in service in the late 90s and would be bought in large numbers. Then there were a bunch of delays, the unit cost of the aircraft skyrocketed and it was decided that a cheaper, smaller aircraft with ground attack capability that took advantage of some new technologies that had been developed in the interim would be an advantageous adjunct to the no-compromise F-22, which was now going to be bought in far fewer numbers. Hence the JSF. A new aircraft was needed to replace a bunch of 3rd and 4th generation fighters anyway. The F-35 also offers a STOVL capability for customers who want that (and hence buy that variant). It is hoped it will compliment the F/A-22 in much the same way as the F-16 has the F-15. Of course it's over-budget and over-time too, so they'll probably have to buy some UAVs or something. [:D] Cheers, Neilster

Arctic Blast -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/28/2007 10:31:06 PM)
Yeah, the Marine Corps are buying the vert. version to replace the Harriers. I guess I can understand how this all happened, it just seems like an overspending of defense resources on one area is all. Especially if they DO end up buying some YF23's as well.

FlipTrac_511 -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/29/2007 5:13:26 AM)
Going by looks alone, I was hoping the YF-22 would win. The YF-23 does look exotic, I'll give it that.

Neilster -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/29/2007 3:36:16 PM)
The F-22 is a pretty funky looking aircraft, especially from certain angles. From others it looks like an F-15 that's been blended more and with the nose chined and most of the right angles adjusted for stealth reasons. Not that there's anything wrong with the F-15s looks. Cheers, Neilster [image]local://upfiles/10515/5683973046794C2AA888129D37373014.jpg[/image] [image]local://upfiles/10515/C0D37214CD9F4698B3A0C756C0A9C9E1.jpg[/image] [image]local://upfiles/10515/17D73B42995B4799960065F5AE781BA5.jpg[/image]

Jeffrey H. -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (5/30/2007 6:00:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AlvinS The YF-23 was built by McDonnell Douglas. I was crushed when we lost the competition. It is a beautiful aircraft. Ummmm it says "Northrop" in big letters and first on the nose. I had the rare privelage of getting to see these two birds up close and personal while they were in storage at CTF inside EAFB. I was a NB2D employee at the time. On the inside of the nosewheel doors, the nicknames of the two prototypes were stenciled in. The dark one was 'Spider' and the light one was 'Grey Ghost'. Sweet looking planes. I always thought the YF-22 looked like a dump truck in caparison.

Fredk -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/20/2007 9:58:22 AM)
Eh, i think they're both ugly as sin, but the engine nacelle (flight engineers fill me in on the real technical term here) humps really put the '23 into its own special category of disgusting asthetics. Surprised so many people find the look of it more pleasing than the -22.

Neilster -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/20/2007 4:04:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fredk Eh, i think they're both ugly as sin, but the engine nacelle (flight engineers fill me in on the real technical term here) humps really put the '23 into its own special category of disgusting asthetics. Surprised so many people find the look of it more pleasing than the -22. Jeez...tough audience. [:D] What do you think of the looks of the S-37 Berkut? Cheers, Neilster [image]local://upfiles/10515/63A1F4E4BF564C4EAC505C22FD6026CC.jpg[/image]

Fredk -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/21/2007 12:53:34 AM)
Pretty sweet Neilster, although to be fair I'm probably a bit biased as my parents gave me, what I recognize now as, the minautrized prototype of that aircraft to play with along with my GI Joes. [8D] Also, is it actually going to be built? I'm I going to have to go to Paris to see it? edited because I'm a grammar mong.

Neilster -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/21/2007 3:15:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fredk Pretty sweet Neilster, although to be fair I'm probably a bit biased as my parents gave me, what I recognize now as, the minautrized prototype of that aircraft to play with along with my GI Joes. [8D] Also, is it actually going to be built? I'm I going to have to go to Paris to see it? edited because I'm a grammar mong. Your childhood toy had forward swept wings? Probably more of an imaginative guess than any real aerodynamic knowledge on the part of the designer. The S-37 is a technology demonstrator that uses some components from the Su-27 family and elsewhere. It now appears the Russkies are offering a production variant to potential customers. Wikipedia gives a good overview of this aircraft and you can see it fly here... http://youtube.com/watch?v=Px-qfKcAQKg Cheers, Neilster

pasternakski -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/21/2007 9:29:08 AM)
The United States experimented with a reverse-swept-wing forward-canard design called the X-29 in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Development was abandoned because, although some performance advantages were gained from the design (particularly in stall and turn characteristics), the airframe proved unstable and subject to unpredictable severe yaw while in flight that caused a couple of near crashes of test aircraft. Toymakers picked up on the exotic design, which was found only in sonny's toy chest until the Russians pulled it out and started playing with it again. Whether they have solved the odd problems presented by the innovations of the design is anyone's guess. They seem to like producing bizarre, "gee whiz" looking aircraft (and tanks) for marketing purposes, kind of putting them into the toy designer category themselves...

Neilster -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/21/2007 2:45:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pasternakski The United States experimented with a reverse-swept-wing forward-canard design called the X-29 in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Development was abandoned because, although some performance advantages were gained from the design (particularly in stall and turn characteristics), the airframe proved unstable and subject to unpredictable severe yaw while in flight that caused a couple of near crashes of test aircraft. Toymakers picked up on the exotic design, which was found only in sonny's toy chest until the Russians pulled it out and started playing with it again. Whether they have solved the odd problems presented by the innovations of the design is anyone's guess. They seem to like producing bizarre, "gee whiz" looking aircraft (and tanks) for marketing purposes, kind of putting them into the toy designer category themselves... Thanks for your interest pasternakski but I'm wondering what exactly you mean by "the airframe proved unstable" and do you have a reference for this "unpredictable severe yaw while in flight that caused a couple of near crashes of test aircraft"? I'm a fighter aircraft technician and have a keen interest in this field. All CCV vehicles (ie most modern fighters) are inherently unstable and are kept in a straight line by their computer controlled flight control system. The Russians test flew the forward swept wing Ju 287 (captured from the Germans) in 1947 so they were very familiar with the concept before the X-29. What "bizarre, "gee whiz" looking aircraft (and tanks)" have the Russians marketed? I can only think of sober, capable and fairly conventional designs like the Flanker family and their Main Battle Tanks. Their WIG (Wing in Ground-effect) stuff looks unusual but AFAIK haven't been marketed. In what way does this put Russian designers in the "toy designer category"? I can assure you that Russian military technology was taken deadly seriously at my old Air Force squadron a few years ago. No one was too keen to get a Vympel R-77 up their arse. Cheers, Neilster

SemperAugustus -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/21/2007 4:53:03 PM)
Was the main problem with forward swept wings the stress on the wing tips? The Germans ran into some issue with the design, anyone know?

Neilster -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/21/2007 6:21:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SemperAugustus Was the main problem with forward swept wings the stress on the wing tips? The Germans ran into some issue with the design, anyone know? FSW want to tear off, especially at high speed. To counter this, they generally need to be constructed mainly from ultra-strong composites laid in such a way as to provide extreme strength in particular directions. It's debatable whether the aerodynamic gains (especially gained in the transonic regime) offset the manufacturing effort. Cheers, Neilster

Fredk -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/22/2007 2:44:55 PM)
Thanks for the link Neilster, very cool - although I wish I could block out the comments at the bottom of the youtube pages - they usually give me a headache. Yes, I may be dating myself as a youngster here, but I did have that toy about the time the X-29 development was going on. So it may have not been too much imagination on the part of the toy maker. Also, I was reading the benifits of forward swept wings on the wiki page - is there anything that gives a slight more technical explanation of why the FSWs give these benifits that is still understandable to someone who isn't an aeronautical engineer?

Neilster -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/22/2007 3:04:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fredk Thanks for the link Neilster, very cool - although I wish I could block out the comments at the bottom of the youtube pages - they usually give me a headache. Yes, I may be dating myself as a youngster here, but I did have that toy about the time the X-29 development was going on. So it may have not been too much imagination on the part of the toy maker. Also, I was reading the benifits of forward swept wings on the wiki page - is there anything that gives a slight more technical explanation of why the FSWs give these benifits that is still understandable to someone who isn't an aeronautical engineer? Yes, YouTube comments are usually most annoying, especially when nationalism is involved. Know-nothing 13 year-olds sounding off ad nauseum. For FSW stuff, I'd just google and browse till you find material you like. Modern aerodynamics is a complicated topic though. No doubt you'll learn something as a result anyway. Have fun. Cheers, Neilster

Jeffrey H. -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/22/2007 10:16:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fredk Thanks for the link Neilster, very cool - although I wish I could block out the comments at the bottom of the youtube pages - they usually give me a headache. Yes, I may be dating myself as a youngster here, but I did have that toy about the time the X-29 development was going on. So it may have not been too much imagination on the part of the toy maker. Also, I was reading the benifits of forward swept wings on the wiki page - is there anything that gives a slight more technical explanation of why the FSWs give these benifits that is still understandable to someone who isn't an aeronautical engineer? FSW's help some designs with weight balance.

Jeffrey H. -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/22/2007 10:19:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Neilster quote: ORIGINAL: Fredk Eh, i think they're both ugly as sin, but the engine nacelle (flight engineers fill me in on the real technical term here) humps really put the '23 into its own special category of disgusting asthetics. Surprised so many people find the look of it more pleasing than the -22. Jeez...tough audience. [:D] What do you think of the looks of the S-37 Berkut? Cheers, Neilster [image]local://upfiles/10515/63A1F4E4BF564C4EAC505C22FD6026CC.jpg[/image] What's with those pods extending out behind the AC from the back end ? Different lengths ?

Fredk -> RE: Northrop YF-23 Black Widow II (6/23/2007 2:35:54 AM)
Jeffrey, one is a radar boom and the other houses the landing chute if I remember correctly.

Page: [1]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.65625