RE: AAR from a test run (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich



Message

Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/9/2007 1:19:02 AM)

damage to targets look good, EFACs are crippled

think today, targets will be RRs

[image]local://upfiles/1438/625614DB1DAD4EB8A12B8B9C382040AC.jpg[/image]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/9/2007 1:23:46 AM)

well, it has been bloody, way too bloody, but for this battle, that is the idea

but the LW is taking 10% losses, they can't keep it up for long, plus, they will be short of replacements soon (if the war was to keep going)



[image]local://upfiles/1438/8AC27800802C4585944153EDCD7AEEB3.jpg[/image]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/9/2007 2:32:36 AM)

day 6 was pretty much a day or resting, sent out 2 main raids to the Rhur to knock out some RRs and steal the win

ended up tradeing losses

but got enough points to get the win, so, I was a little worried that the total was too high to get, but I was able to do it, so think it is doable :)

it was shocking to see the battle from the LW side after it was done (as I said, recon, the damage was alot different then I thought it was, the LW was hurting much worse)


still see some things I need to correct :( but that is the reason for the tests

one thing kind of major, the rest minor, many minor :(




Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/9/2007 2:46:38 AM)

that wasn't so bad, corrected a number of bad AFs and changed some GE production, old planes still being built that are not being flown :(




Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 11:53:24 AM)

just a silly test run for BoB41

long day and I tired, but not wanting to go to bed, so plotting silly turns to see how they work out



[image]local://upfiles/1438/70B46EFD617B471B95775AD893EB4A74.jpg[/image]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 11:58:28 AM)

the low raid is a bait, it should draw the RAF like flies to honey, so I got my fastest bombers, and heavy fighters

followed with a star burst raid to the middle each of the first 4 raids are set with a 4 minute delay between them, the RAF can put up a lot of fighters, but so can I

the one to the north, is a very low level raid by my 110s, want to see if they slip in or not, which the other north raid, is more of a decoy, the RAF radar should see that way before they spot the low raid, but, it also has alot of fighters, as I am hopeing the RAF is going to have to scramble to engage it, and I want to hammer anything that gets close

shot of the details on the raids

[image]local://upfiles/1438/9A0FFCB4685A43D7BDCEF58FEFBE1A1C.jpg[/image]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 12:01:29 PM)

which just in case, alot of times when I do stuff like this, I have not run the turn yet (it is waiting on me to hit the button)

it would be cheating to sit here and tell you want I am doing and what I am expecting to happen, when I already know the outcome :)




Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 12:20:28 PM)

Hmmmm

not too swift :)

them Spits sure did some climbing !!!!

I had a Ace up my sleave, and the Spits bounced them !!!!

no good Brits, never did play fair

we pretty much trading losses so far, but....



[image]local://upfiles/1438/1652DB0242DA49039EE3762129A5E837.jpg[/image]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 12:22:39 PM)

and again, I have lines turned on, you can also have the plane type to show what is going on, I like, am used to using lines

we also hope to have a Icon system set up, so it will show the raid as a national Icon instead of a plane type




Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 12:53:42 PM)

overall, would of been a good day, of course, Luft 3 just stood down, and the northern boys got to play in the sauna all day

I needed to flip the raids around, my 2nd raid was fast, while the 3rd and 4th were pretty slow, so a gap showed up, I should of checked the review missions and looked at the Time on Target, oh well, I said I was tired :)

I got some good runway damage, as 4 or so Spits were lost trying to land after the raids

overall, would be happy, but for the last raid, that was the one I was counting on

the low level raid worked like a charm, the RAF didn't pick it up, until it crossed the coast, and by then it was too late to catch up to it, base got hit good, and the RAF lost a lot of Balloons too

[image]local://upfiles/1438/BBBE69881DC6445880011C2191A71D76.jpg[/image]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 12:57:04 PM)

which if you look at that screen, that is why I and others say to recon, since I kind of set up the defence at most of those bases, I know what is there, and what the raid detail is saying, is not even close :)

one thing I did see, one the main raid was broken up and on the way home and all split up, just as the fighters got into them, they broke off and reacted to my deep raid, so the plan worked, or my bomber losses would of been worse

all timeing, 2 or 3 minutes here or there and we looking at a lot of losses or only a few



[image]local://upfiles/1438/7434C28B95144385AF5701E0E7F417BC.jpg[/image]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 12:59:04 PM)

what is shocking for me is the number of IICs that got hit, there are just not that many of them out there, so the few units that had them, got hammered

overall, so far, got to say, the Wind is looking like a good plane

[image]local://upfiles/1438/5933A4FD298C438AB78508C9BDB60471.jpg[/image]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 1:01:46 PM)

ahhhh

those Cane Is shouldn't of been there, that squadron was suppost to move to 13 group, oh well

that is why I run tests



[image]local://upfiles/1438/F5560D25887846D391D4DDDE76C5148A.jpg[/image]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/10/2007 1:16:32 PM)

Corrected

something I seen, corrected

:)




fochinell -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/11/2007 2:58:54 PM)

Just wanted to say that the extra waypoints are an excellent idea [&o]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/14/2007 2:26:15 PM)

been running a AI vs AI test run, to see just what goes on

stopped the game and was pokeing around, and went into the 56th FG pilot list

LOL, guess who is a ACE !

oh my



[image]local://upfiles/1438/A51B47B237124C0BBF7B5BC27A5A08AE.jpg[/image]



JamesM -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/14/2007 2:43:00 PM)

HS,

It looks like you and your team are doing a great job to upgrade this game. I am waiting with bated breath for its release. [&o]

[&o][&o][&o][&o][&o]



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/15/2007 12:58:31 AM)

LOL

Me too :)




Andy Mac -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/15/2007 5:13:16 PM)

Thanks for the AAR I Cannot wait EFAC = eNGINE fACTORY ?



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/15/2007 5:29:28 PM)

Roger

the short cut in names for some of the sites

Aircraft FAC
Engine FAC
C Avoninic FAC (or parts) (don't know for sure where the C came from :)






sauro brusch -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/15/2007 6:51:08 PM)

BOSS YOU ARE THE BEST IN THE WORLD[:D]...WELL DONE JOB[&o][&o][&o]
I MUST HAVE BOB AND BTR...
A STUPID QUESTION... WHEN WE CAN GET [:D] 



Mad Onion -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/15/2007 7:28:42 PM)

You can't [:@]
If you are lucky you could buy it from ebay or somthing



wernerpruckner -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/15/2007 11:26:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mad Onion

You can't [:@]
If you are lucky you could buy it from ebay or somthing


not yet ( the new one )

the old one you may only get via ebay....



BigDuke66 -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/16/2007 6:56:54 PM)

@sauro
Save your money and just buy 2 of this game.[:D]



sauro brusch -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/16/2007 8:58:19 PM)

Dear friends i have one  of old   Bob and Two of old Btr, OK, but i mean the new Bob and Btr.
I have  buy these games in 1993.i am impatient.....i'm crazy about these new games.   



von Shagmeister -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/24/2007 4:50:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge


C Avoninic FAC (or parts) (don't know for sure where the C came from :)



Component FAC



Speedysteve -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/26/2007 10:22:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sauro

Dear friends i have one  of old   Bob and Two of old Btr, OK, but i mean the new Bob and Btr.
I have  buy these games in 1993.i am impatient.....i'm crazy about these new games.   


We are too. A lot of work is going on with testing.
Patience young Padawan....patience[;)]



goodboyladdie -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/30/2007 9:52:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge

been running a AI vs AI test run, to see just what goes on

stopped the game and was pokeing around, and went into the 56th FG pilot list

LOL, guess who is a ACE !

oh my



[image]local://upfiles/1438/A51B47B237124C0BBF7B5BC27A5A08AE.jpg[/image]


[:D] Is this something you have had hard coded HS?

An Ace dev and now an Ace pilot. It is great to see everyone is working so hard to get this to all the impatient waiters. Thank you for taking the time to test it so thoroughly. It would be great to get a game that does not need patching twice in the first week for a change!



Hard Sarge -> RE: AAR from a test run (6/30/2007 11:24:31 AM)

I was put into the data base, a long time ago, before this project started :)

as for testing and nonpatching, can't even say that with all the test runs and checks, something is not going to be seen, that should of been seen

the good part is, OOB changes, corrections and stuff like that, can be fixed, corrected, changed in a short time, a programming error,change, may take a bit

but if all goes according to plan, the first patch, should be more a feature patch, then a oops, need to fix that type of patch



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.765625