Start Lines in China (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames



Message


Froonp -> Start Lines in China (6/16/2007 10:47:53 AM)

Here is a thread to review the start lines in China.
They do not change for nearly all the war, but I made 6 maps for showing them : 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1943 and 1944.
On each map, there is
- the start line as it is now coded in MWiF depicted as a solid line, and
- the start line as I think it should be depicted as a semi transparent line.

Please comment on those start line to help improve them.

Here are the 1939 start lines :

[image]local://upfiles/10447/B3774BFABB694737ACC6CCB0B735CE27.jpg[/image]




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/16/2007 10:50:48 AM)

Here are the 1940 start lines (same color as the 1939 ones) :

[image]local://upfiles/10447/715AA2EA08294E2EA2E0648506196937.jpg[/image]




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/16/2007 10:52:50 AM)

Here are the 1941 start lines :

[image]local://upfiles/10447/8EA84CD0BB6B48B5A1AE8121B225703B.jpg[/image]




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/16/2007 10:54:28 AM)

Here are the 1942 start lines :

[image]local://upfiles/10447/20723A31486B492091BBE2970FCDD890.jpg[/image]




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/16/2007 10:56:16 AM)

Here are the 1943 start lines :

[image]local://upfiles/10447/526DD5B1DBFA4378A7C3D74A2E6DF201.jpg[/image]




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/16/2007 10:57:49 AM)

Here are the 1944 start lines :

[image]local://upfiles/10447/640E6CD911C347D5A4AE7C85605B143D.jpg[/image]




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/16/2007 11:04:07 AM)

As a note, here are the starting dates of the MWiF / WiF FE scenarios :
Fascist Tide : S/O 39 (Europe)
Global War : S/O 39
Missed the Bus : J/A 40
Barbarossa : M/J 41 (Part of Europe, 5 Turns)
Lebensraum : S/O 41
Day of Infamy : N/D 41 (Pacific)
Waking Giant : N/D 41
Guadalcanal : M/J 42 (Pacific, 5 turns)
Brute Force : M/J 42
Darkness Before Dawn : J/A 43
Decline and Fall : M/J 44




wosung -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/17/2007 4:21:22 PM)

Patrice, I checked afew things:

S/O 39 Start line:
-Hex “Yellow” [River] should be Jap, also Hex West of it.
-Hex East of “Yellow” [River] should remain Jap.
-Hex West of Wuhan should be Jap.
-Hex Hex South-West of Wuhan should be Jap, also Hex West of it.
-Hex North of Lake Tungling (between the 2 rivers) should be Jap.
-Hainan should be Jap (conquered 1.-3.39)
-Right, Nanchang and hexes around it should be Jap (city fell End of March 1939)
-Also your corrections with the frontline East of Nanyang, seem right to me

J/A 40 Start line:
-Hex Ichang and the Yangzi-Hexes to Lake Tungling should be Jap. (Result of Battle of Tsaoyang/Ichang 5.6-40)-
-Hex Nanning, the 2 Hexes South of it, Hex Pakhoi, the 2 hexes South of it Jap (Result of Nanning offensive 11.39 inspite of Chinese counteroffensive starting in 12.39)

M/J 41 Start line
-essentially same as J/A 40 Start line (minor battles, offensives, counteroffensives stalemates)


S/O 41 start line
-essentially same as M/J41 Start line (5.41 Battle f Southern Shansi: some Jap Progress North to South toward the Yellow River, but only some 10 km. 9.41 2nd. battle of Changsha, Chinese front held)


M/J 42 start line
-Pakhoi was under Jap control since Nanning offensive 11.39
-Probably right about small Perimeter around Canton
- apart of this: nothing new (3d battle of Changsha 12.41-1.42, front held)


J/A 43 start line
-nothing new (Battle of Western Hupei 5-6.43 stalemate)


M/J 44 start line
-instead of the rather huge Jap gains toward Sian of the WIFFE start line, it should be only 2 hexes West of Kaifeng (Battle of Central Honan 4.-6.44: IJA mostly moved along the Kaifeng Sian rail and along the Peking-Wuhan rail. End of April IJA reached Loyang, about 100km West of Kaifeng, and some 30 km South of Chengchow).


Sources
-Hsu Long-hsuen and Chang Ming-kai, History of The Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945) 2nd Ed., 1971. Translated by Wen Ha-hsiung, Chung Wu Publishing; 33, 140th Lane, Tung-hwa Street, Taipei, Taiwan Republic of China.
-Oxford companion to the WW2
-Peter Young, Atlas of WW2
-Times Atlas of WW2
-Wikipedia (which mostly is an abstract of Hsu Long-hsuen)


Regards




Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/17/2007 9:26:16 PM)

Wosung,

Terriffic![&o][&o][&o]




wosung -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/17/2007 10:34:41 PM)

Thanx,

but all of you feel free to correct this stuff.

Problem is, the maps are very sketchy for the progress of the war in China. Usually they do have a frontline for 1937-1943 and one for 1944.

Regards




trees -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/20/2007 8:38:44 AM)

also thanks for the bibliographical details!




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/20/2007 11:05:37 PM)

Wosung, first thanks for your comments and suggestions.

quote:

S/O 39 Start line:
-Hex “Yellow” [River] should be Jap, also Hex West of it.
-Hex East of “Yellow” [River] should remain Jap.
-Hex West of Wuhan should be Jap.
-Hex Hex South-West of Wuhan should be Jap, also Hex West of it.
-Hex North of Lake Tungling (between the 2 rivers) should be Jap.
-Hainan should be Jap (conquered 1.-3.39)
-Right, Nanchang and hexes around it should be Jap (city fell End of March 1939)
-Also your corrections with the frontline East of Nanyang, seem right to me

This would make the 1939 start lines look like this
(solid line = current MWiF line / semi transparent line = line advised by wosung)

Question : Should the treaty ports (Swatow, Amoy, Foochow, Wenchow) be Japanese controlled in S/O 1939 ?

[image]local://upfiles/10447/EFA37BBAC80F4290B3906DC111D68393.jpg[/image]




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/20/2007 11:14:54 PM)

quote:

J/A 40 Start line:
-Hex Ichang and the Yangzi-Hexes to Lake Tungling should be Jap. (Result of Battle of Tsaoyang/Ichang 5.6-40)-
-Hex Nanning, the 2 Hexes South of it, Hex Pakhoi, the 2 hexes South of it Jap (Result of Nanning offensive 11.39 inspite of Chinese counteroffensive starting in 12.39)

Here is the result of your suggestions for the 1940 start lines.
The bit you wrote about Pakhoi's 2 hexes south puzzles me, as there is only sea south of Pakhoi.

Questions :
- Is my depiction ok ?
- About Nanning being Japanese controlled, is this right for 1941-1943 & 1944 too ?

[image]local://upfiles/10447/166EA5EC47AB451B9C3A4AA5EAAC879E.jpg[/image]




wosung -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/20/2007 11:40:56 PM)

quote:

This would make the 1939 start lines look like this
(solid line = current MWiF line / semi transparent line = line advised by wosung)

Question : Should the treaty ports (Swatow, Amoy, Foochow, Wenchow) be Japanese controlled in S/O 1939 ?


Yeah, I forgot the Southern treaty ports:

Date of Japanese invasion/occuption:


-Amoy: May 1938
-Swatow: June 1938
-Foochow: May 1941
-Wenchow: 11.7.1942 (!)

Note that Southern Chekiang, Western Kiangsi and most of Fukien province never were occupied by the Japanese. Esp. Fukien politically wasn't important

Sources
-Hsu Long-hsuen and Chang Ming-kai, History of The Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945) 2nd Ed., 1971. Translated by Wen Ha-hsiung, Chung Wu Publishing; 33, 140th Lane, Tung-hwa Street, Taipei, Taiwan Republic of China.
-Oxford companion to the WW2

Regards




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/20/2007 11:46:19 PM)

quote:

M/J 41 Start line
-essentially same as J/A 40 Start line (minor battles, offensives, counteroffensives stalemates)


S/O 41 start line
-essentially same as M/J41 Start line (5.41 Battle f Southern Shansi: some Jap Progress North to South toward the Yellow River, but only some 10 km. 9.41 2nd. battle of Changsha, Chinese front held)


M/J 42 start line
-Pakhoi was under Jap control since Nanning offensive 11.39
-Probably right about small Perimeter around Canton
- apart of this: nothing new (3d battle of Changsha 12.41-1.42, front held)


J/A 43 start line
-nothing new (Battle of Western Hupei 5-6.43 stalemate)


M/J 44 start line
-instead of the rather huge Jap gains toward Sian of the WIFFE start line, it should be only 2 hexes West of Kaifeng (Battle of Central Honan 4.-6.44: IJA mostly moved along the Kaifeng Sian rail and along the Peking-Wuhan rail. End of April IJA reached Loyang, about 100km West of Kaifeng, and some 30 km South of Chengchow).

So, for the 1944 start lines, the map should look that way, that's it ?

[image]local://upfiles/10447/E10A570672A24E83AE23ADD7DFCBA733.jpg[/image]




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/20/2007 11:52:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: wosung
Yeah, I forgot the Southern treaty ports:

Date of Japanese invasion/occuption:


-Amoy: May 1938
-Swatow: June 1938
-Foochow: May 1941
-Wenchow: 11.7.1942 (!)

Note that Southern Chekiang, Western Kiangsi and most of Fukien province never were occupied by the Japanese. Esp. Fukien politically wasn't important

Thanks, I updated the maps. No need to upload new pictures. [:D]




wosung -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/21/2007 2:22:10 AM)

Pakhoi
Ok, then it should be 1 hex.

Concerning Nanning:
Frontline here quite often changed:

-24.11.39 Jap took Nanning (Haninan/Nanning Offensive Spring-Autumn 39 to isolate National government from its seaports.)
-30.10.40 Chin retook Nanning (counteroffensive since Winter 39)
-20.11.44 Jap took Nanning (Operation Ichigo, Kweilin-Liuchow sector, to establish continental line of communication )
-27.5.45 Chin retook it (counter offensive)

Sources
-Hsu Long-hsuen and Chang Ming-kai, History of The Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945) 2nd Ed., 1971. Translated by Wen Ha-hsiung, Chung Wu Publishing; 33, 140th Lane, Tung-hwa Street, Taipei, Taiwan Republic of China.
-Oxford companion to the WW2


Regards




Incy -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/21/2007 2:28:03 AM)

with this start line much of the good defence lines of china are broken. With current rules, the only sensible thing for china to do would be to give up quite a large amount of land and try to hold some lines more to the rear.

I really, really think mWIF has to change the setup order or move order in the china theatre. With such a mobile front it's just to much of an advantage for japan to set up with enourmous flexibility, and THEN move first with guaranteed fine weather. In WiF this doesn't matter that much because the line will mostly be continous, all hexes wil be held. China gets to set the line and Japan get's to pick a spot to attack, and little manouvre is possible.

But in mWIF, it's a war of manouvre, and since Japan gets last setup plus first moves, China is forced to give up a LOT of ground (to avoid guaranteed disaster). If there is no willingness to fix setup/move order I suggest we move the start line quite a bit east to compensate for the inevitable initial gains for japan. After all, the lines as shown show the extent of japanese lines, but historically there were significant chinese units on the "wrong side" of the line shown.




Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/21/2007 3:04:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Incy

with this start line much of the good defence lines of china are broken. With current rules, the only sensible thing for china to do would be to give up quite a large amount of land and try to hold some lines more to the rear.

I really, really think mWIF has to change the setup order or move order in the china theatre. With such a mobile front it's just to much of an advantage for japan to set up with enourmous flexibility, and THEN move first with guaranteed fine weather. In WiF this doesn't matter that much because the line will mostly be continous, all hexes wil be held. China gets to set the line and Japan get's to pick a spot to attack, and little manouvre is possible.

But in mWIF, it's a war of manouvre, and since Japan gets last setup plus first moves, China is forced to give up a LOT of ground (to avoid guaranteed disaster). If there is no willingness to fix setup/move order I suggest we move the start line quite a bit east to compensate for the inevitable initial gains for japan. After all, the lines as shown show the extent of japanese lines, but historically there were significant chinese units on the "wrong side" of the line shown.

I would like to wait for play test first before deciding.

However, it is rather easy to permit the players to change the order in which major powers set up. I don't want to make that a universally available 'feature', but if the consensus is that your above conclusions are correct, then I could include changing the setup order of Japan/China as an option.




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/21/2007 9:30:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: wosung

Pakhoi
Ok, then it should be 1 hex.

Concerning Nanning:
Frontline here quite often changed:

-24.11.39 Jap took Nanning (Haninan/Nanning Offensive Spring-Autumn 39 to isolate National government from its seaports.)
-30.10.40 Chin retook Nanning (counteroffensive since Winter 39)
-20.11.44 Jap took Nanning (Operation Ichigo, Kweilin-Liuchow sector, to establish continental line of communication )
-27.5.45 Chin retook it (counter offensive)

So, Finally, Nanning is never controlled by Japan at the start of the WiF FE scenarios. I also remove the control of the 2 hexes S of Nanning. I added the control of the peninsula to the east of Pakhoi, who seems to have been Japanese from 1938.




wosung -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/21/2007 10:37:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: wosung

Pakhoi
Ok, then it should be 1 hex.

Concerning Nanning:
Frontline here quite often changed:

-24.11.39 Jap took Nanning (Haninan/Nanning Offensive Spring-Autumn 39 to isolate National government from its seaports.)
-30.10.40 Chin retook Nanning (counteroffensive since Winter 39)
-20.11.44 Jap took Nanning (Operation Ichigo, Kweilin-Liuchow sector, to establish continental line of communication )
-27.5.45 Chin retook it (counter offensive)

So, Finally, Nanning is never controlled by Japan at the start of the WiF FE scenarios. I also remove the control of the 2 hexes S of Nanning. I added the control of the peninsula to the east of Pakhoi, who seems to have been Japanese from 1938.


What about J/A 1940?




Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/21/2007 12:29:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: wosung
quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp
quote:

ORIGINAL: wosung
Pakhoi
Ok, then it should be 1 hex.

Concerning Nanning:
Frontline here quite often changed:

-24.11.39 Jap took Nanning (Haninan/Nanning Offensive Spring-Autumn 39 to isolate National government from its seaports.)
-30.10.40 Chin retook Nanning (counteroffensive since Winter 39)
-20.11.44 Jap took Nanning (Operation Ichigo, Kweilin-Liuchow sector, to establish continental line of communication )
-27.5.45 Chin retook it (counter offensive)

So, Finally, Nanning is never controlled by Japan at the start of the WiF FE scenarios. I also remove the control of the 2 hexes S of Nanning. I added the control of the peninsula to the east of Pakhoi, who seems to have been Japanese from 1938.


What about J/A 1940?

Yes, Missed the Bus (1940 startlines) should have Nanning under Japanese control.




Froonp -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/21/2007 9:52:37 PM)

quote:


Yes, Missed the Bus (1940 startlines) should have Nanning under Japanese control.

Right, I changed the file.




jcprom -> RE: Start Lines in China (6/22/2007 6:51:59 PM)

With lots of divisions available at set up, MWIF could simulate such frontlines (depending on the players' styles, of course).




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.40625