Charles2222 -> RE: Naval operations of WW2 (7/15/2007 9:28:21 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GreyFox Hmm, a lot of the reviewers there don't like the inaccuracies in The Pacific War, so I might give it a miss. Thanks anyways for the recommendation. I don't have a problem with dryness - I've read Max Hastings and Antony Beevor so I appreciate a well told story that backs everything up with provable facts and good research. Must be the science student in me. The biggest problem I find with finding books about WW2 is that there is too much sensationalist stuff such as the recent book about the bombing of Dresden in which the author gives a bodycount of 100,000 but then withdrew it in a letter to the Times, as well as the Stephen Ambrose stuff (what was it... "more interested in erecting pillars to the American fighting man than giving the truth" or something). Entertaining sure, but little more than wishful thinking at best and propaganda at worst. I apprecaite your attitude towards things historic, as I share them. There's nothing that irritates me more than some clown who thinks they are doing something patriotic by insisting that their country did everything, and continues to do everything, the best. It's fine to hope for that, but to pass it off as history is something else again. To fail to have much of any understanding of history, is to approach it with nationalism.
|
|
|
|