Tutorial 6 - Aircraft (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Modern] >> Harpoon 3 - Advanced Naval Warfare >> Harpoon 3 ANW Support



Message


yeknod -> Tutorial 6 - Aircraft (8/12/2007 8:50:29 PM)

Hi

I'm going through the tutorials but at this point it appears that my passive sensors are not able to pick up the Airbus. I gain a visual identification as it flys past rather than gain an unidentified contact north of my position.

Any help to get a passive contact as the tutorial suggests.. I'm using the ANW 2.0 database?

Thanks in advance!




yeknod -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors (8/13/2007 10:31:21 PM)

Same results playing with sensors on full reality - Airbus picked up only as a visual. Any ideas about how to correct this?



[image]local://upfiles/6834/2ACB121C58984A86A4327424A9C3EFFE.jpg[/image]




yeknod -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors (8/13/2007 10:50:45 PM)

Or is it because Stealth Airbus is riding the waves at 31m? A bit better with active radar

[image]local://upfiles/6834/BB586AE40EBD400A9F415A6AD4B7D953.jpg[/image]




Bucks -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/15/2007 5:55:13 AM)

yeknod,

There's a problem with the ODB and the scenario seems broken. Looks to me like there's an error somewhere with the Perry's ESM system.

I've included a screenshot from the Tutorial III scenario using my DB, and I've made some annotations to explain what's meant to be happening. I'll make another addition to the thread with an explanation of what your seeing.

Sorry about the DB issue, I'll get it listed for AGSI so the ODB gets looked at for 3.8.1.

Cheers

Darren



[image]local://upfiles/21733/B29A7DEBB35642C0A952353359876A0F.jpg[/image]




Bucks -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/15/2007 5:58:48 AM)

Part 2:

In this screenshot you'll see there are actually 2 Airbuses in the scenario. The "Sea Skimmer", and the ESM contact you should have detected to the north.

Cheers

Darren

[image]local://upfiles/21733/A653893D18A241DE903246F038321C3E.jpg[/image]




yeknod -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/15/2007 8:12:07 AM)

Darren

Thanks for the reply and explanations.

Although the idea of an uber-kewl commercial Airbus taking its passengers for marine mamal spotting is intensely exciting for any game to simulate I think I rather prefer your database to mine... um, any chance you could direct me to a DB that will bring my imagination back to reality?





Bucks -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/15/2007 10:34:43 AM)

yeknod,

I've sent you a PM in reply to your DB request. I'll be releasing the public Beta version of the HUD3 shortly. I'm working on a timeline to hopefully coincide with the release of 3.8.1 - (less scen rebuilding for me). I'm hoping it goes along way to correcting some of these errors we've had with the standard database since the days of Harpoon 2.

Cheers

Darren




BurntFingers -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/15/2007 6:55:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bucks

I'll be releasing the public Beta version of the HUD3 shortly. I'm working on a timeline to hopefully coincide with the release of 3.8.1 - (less scen rebuilding for me).Darren



Most excellent news!




shunwick -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/15/2007 8:08:24 PM)

Indeed.

Best wishes,




yeknod -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/15/2007 8:56:42 PM)

Thanks Darren, I appreciate the help. I hope your work goes smoothly.




FreekS -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/16/2007 12:15:45 AM)

deleted!




yeknod -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/20/2007 12:17:28 AM)

I got the Tutorials running correctly thanks to Bucks.. but, no, no, no... how come my Mighty Perry and its 76mm is out-gunned by an Alligator / Tapir dual 57mm... the shame?




yeknod -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/20/2007 5:32:16 AM)

Thanks for the tip.. interesting, it gives me that option in the ANW Database 2.0 but not PlayersDB 7 or Buck's beta... hmmmm, the complexity of this game is about to explode my brain...




Flankerk -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/20/2007 10:52:23 AM)

Just tried some of the tutorials as rebuilt on Harpoon HQ and they seem fine, the guns firing etc.

The thread here suggests various introductory scenarios :-

http://www.harpoonhq.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=4618




yeknod -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/20/2007 10:25:41 PM)

Thanks everyone, I tried Tutorial 4 with the ANW 2.0 database and my Mighty Perry out-gunned the Tapir - Alligator which didn't shoot back.. such a difference in databases.. the 76mm ASuW rounds were far more effective.

So I guess the great question is, which database to use with ANW 3.8?

Thanks for all the links to newbie scenarios.

Are there any 3rd party Excel spreadsheets that lists platforms and weapons ranges and effectivelness and sensors.. .it'd be good to compare equipment and spot advantages and disadvantages?




TonyE -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/21/2007 3:33:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: yeknod

Are there any 3rd party Excel spreadsheets that lists platforms and weapons ranges and effectivelness and sensors.. .it'd be good to compare equipment and spot advantages and disadvantages?



There is the HHQ Database encyclopedia http://www.harpoondatabases.com with lots of nicely laid out information.

I'm achingly slowly expanding the reporting capabilities of dbComp http://harpgamer.com/harpforum/index.php?automodule=downloads&showfile=18 (I should have another update to it posted some time this coming weekend, if not earlier, same URL). You point to the database directory you want to look at (old database), once that import finishes you will find most of the data imported into the l... and t2... tables for use to craft your own reports. Or use the few I've done, JanMasterson has done a number as well and I'll probably ask if I can throw them into dbComp for the next release.






Bucks -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/21/2007 3:43:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: yeknod

Thanks for the tip.. interesting, it gives me that option in the ANW Database 2.0 but not PlayersDB 7 or Buck's beta... hmmmm, the complexity of this game is about to explode my brain...


Yeknod,

It's not so much the complexity, rather the various "philosophical" approaches to the game taken by the various Database Editors.

The HUD-II/HUD3 and the PDB platforms based on the HUD-II database use my "happy medium" approach. Originally in Harpoon 2, most gun mounts would be loaded with multiple ammunition types. Normally these would consist of: armour piercing ammo, General HE ammo, a dual purpose type (AAW/ASuW) and a fragmentation type for use against air targets.

Unfortunately the game engine has no way of determining the correct ammunition to use in each specific case. As Dale has pointed out:

quote:

I'd have to check (I'm on another comp at the moment) but I'd have to say that it's because the Perry's Mk75 was loaded with an AAW rounds as opposed to an anti-surface round.


The game really needs an internal check so that it can logically decide which target to engage in cases where we have multiple rounds loaded on a mount with :

Darren's "psuedo code"

3 Gun ammo types:

General Purpose HE - Valid targets - ALL
AAW Frag - Valid targets - Aircraft/Missile
Semi Armour Piercing - All surface targets, not air capable.

- Check for Target Type
- Target Type is: Aircraft
- Exclude gun ammo without aircraft listed as valid target
- (Leaves GP - HE and Frag rounds)
- Check for greater %hit value - (AAW Frag Ammo say 45% vs 30%)
- Fire AAW Frag rounds


There are other issues and I don't want to "overload" people with this stuff but that, would make a good place to start for mounts with multiple ammo types so the system has some functionality to it.

I choose to settle for a generic DP ammo type - "dual purpose" round for guns. I've also added magazines for the guns rather than store all of the ammunition on the mount itself. Even modern guns only have a small component of their total available ammunition stored "on mount". As we move back in history, we find a larger component of the guns ammunition stored in an armoured magazine.

Dale again:
quote:

The ANW DB uses the H4 mini rules that specify different ranges for AAW and ASuW guns. Most guns have multiple variants of both types but for the sake of simplicity I just made the AAW and ASuW types. If I wanted to be super realistic I could put in all the different types of ammo that gun uses...


My dual purpose gun ammunition is a COMPROMISE, to achieve a working solution for a general gunnery system. I've had to make a few decisions that we are presently examining within the HUD3 design team. For instance I have averaged the ammunition range so that HUD3 guns will have a shorter ASuW range than the minis data and a slightly longer range for AAW rounds. I am still using the minis %hit chances and I'm presently updating the damage inflicted. I've also made changes to the rate of fire to reflect the different clases of gun system. Dale's made a point about simplicity and I have to back him on that. You can go too far...

I hope I've provided an insight into why there are so many databases and if nothing more a brief examination of how I approach the work I do while editing the HUD3. We've also had Dale briefly explain his approach and while his style maybe be different we are both aiming at incorporating the current Harpoon 4.1 miniatures system and annex data into our H3ANW databases.

Cheers

Darren







Bucks -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/21/2007 5:07:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: yeknod

I got the Tutorials running correctly thanks to Bucks.. but, no, no, no... how come my Mighty Perry and its 76mm is out-gunned by an Alligator / Tapir dual 57mm... the shame?


Yeknod,

Here's a breakdown of what's happening and what it's based on.

Aligator Guns:

AK-725 57mm/80 Twin
Max Rng: 4.3nm (8600 yards)
Near Surface PK: 50
Far Surface PK: 25
Warhead: 57mm/80 Twin DP (Soviet) - 6dp

O.H. Perry Guns:

Mk75 76mm/62
Max Rng: 4.1nm (8200 yards)
Near Surface PK: 65
Far Surface PK: 33
Warhead: 76mm/62 DP - 5dp

I'd like to point out that the Near and Far values apply to ASuW engagements. I've tested this and posted something to the WW2 forum a while back. I'll try to find it and post it here to show everyone the number of rounds fired and the hits recorded.

It looks like a fairly even fight, the Perry has a greater damage total to have the Alligator waste its rounds on although, more systems to receive criticals for with the damage it takes. I've played through the Tute myself and I suffered the same idignity of having the Perry go down to an amphib...[&:]

Then again when I shower the Alligator with SAMs in ASuW mode the amphib becomes a artificial reef. Also firing multiple SAMs has a good chance of literally knocking the 57mm mount off the deck of the Alligator (weapon mount critical) [:D] If I close and find she's not firing, then I can let the Mk75 finish her off...

Cheers

Darren





yeknod -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/21/2007 6:50:56 AM)

Darren, thanks for the explanations - things are looking clearer now.

Interesting how databases reflect different philosophies - I can appreciate how much work goes into compiling each database.

Although I might normally want to smack a Tapir with the back of a missile its been fun getting close to use gunnery. Now, on to Tutorial 5 submarines... don't suppose I'm ever going to get a nice fat, fixed and ID'd contact with these...




BurntFingers -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/21/2007 5:36:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: yeknod

Now, on to Tutorial 5 submarines... don't suppose I'm ever going to get a nice fat, fixed and ID'd contact with these...


Well, when you start picking up the sounds of torpedoes incoming, it's a fair bet there's a sub down that bearing somewhere. ;)

ANW does seem to model firing solutions well. One way to speed up getting a good fix is to change course and speed. It still takes quite a while, but it's a mistake just to carry on the same bearing thinking "That sub should be within sonar range now...now...NOW".





Bungle -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/22/2007 2:57:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bucks

Then again when I shower the Alligator with SAMs in ASuW mode the amphib becomes a artificial reef. Also firing multiple SAMs has a good chance of literally knocking the 57mm mount off the deck of the Alligator (weapon mount critical) [:D] If I close and find she's not firing, then I can let the Mk75 finish her off...

Cheers

Darren




With the SAM in ASuW does the data base take into account propellent/fuel load of the missile? I seem to remember it related to contagion...... Very interesting and helpful thread thanks to all.




BurntFingers -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/22/2007 4:54:29 PM)

All fair points VCDH.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bungle



With the SAM in ASuW does the data base take into account propellent/fuel load of the missile? I seem to remember it related to contagion...... Very interesting and helpful thread thanks to all.



Up to a point (I THINK I'm right here). The fuel in the round is considered self contained - the ship doesn't provide the fuel, it's always contained in the weapon.

HOWEVER, unburnt fuel is added to the formula for the explosion.

I think this changed occurred around version 3.4 of Harpoon.

I could be TOTALLY wrong on this though!




Bungle -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/22/2007 7:56:18 PM)

Im pretty sure the propellent/fuel was incorporated within damage points when using AAM's in a ASuW role, have been trying to find it in the paper rules to no avail however I could be wrong, again! [:D]  From memory dp was pretty low in the ASuW role

I am more confident in the fire/contagion change, there was an increase chance of fire and of it spreading, I was curious as to whether this is modelled into the game.




yeknod -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/26/2007 3:06:08 PM)

Propellent?

My freakin Sentry in Lesson 6 Database ANW 2.0 could use some propellent. It could use some propellent and a Harpoon up its Sentry butt because this little baby won't shift from the runway. How, I'm a reasonable chap, I can accept that a commercial product may have its little Stealth Airbus idiosyncracies but when I have to search around the WWW looking for databases to work I start to get a little peeved when the darn $60-worth of labour sweated at my place of work appears to have bought a sloppy piece of Sentry atrophy.


Matrix, AGS, fix or do sumfink! Airbuses are one thing but I want me Sentry to work!




Flankerk -> RE: Tutorial 3 - Sensors - "Spoiler Alert" (8/26/2007 5:32:44 PM)

Although i'm probably biassed I'd seriously recommend trying out the scenarios on Harpoon HQ including the rebuilt tutorials there. You have to bear in mind that the Original Database is going back a bit and isn't easily maintained either.
One of the big strengths of the product is that the game engine will work with other databases that people have worked on. Unfortunately one of the weaknesses of the product is that the game engine still works with material that isn't exactly original .[;)]




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.828125