Norman42 -> RE: Resource Types (2/12/2008 1:34:44 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Froonp quote:
ORIGINAL: Norman42 I agree, the colours are a bit much, a simple (small) label in perhaps italics would suffice. Marcus: The problem with the Calgary resource is there isnt a predominant mineral there (other then Oil). I would suggest either "Livestock" or "Grain" as these were the main resources of Alberta aside from Oil. Personally, I'd go with Livestock. Gotta feed those GI's. Or simply "Food", as for the Netherlands ? I like "Livestock" personally, that way it covers not just food, but other animal products that were used in war industy, ie Nitrates, Leather, Wool, Glue, Fertilizer, Medical Supplies, and most importantly, Horses... which were used in WW2 by every single nation. The Wehrmact alone used 3 million+ horses throughout the war. -Little known fact #1: WW2 saw an estimated 17 million horses killed. -Little known fact #2: The wool linings of every cold-weather flight suit used by Bomber Command was produced by a single Scottish sheep farm that became known as "Lancaster Farms" and was awarded a citation by the British Govt post war. Could probably use the same "Livestock" term for the Netherlands. .
|
|
|
|