Paul Goodman -> (3/16/2002 1:32:07 PM)
|
Actually, the disease rates seem like a throwback in history. Typically, disease inflicted far more casualties that combat. Disease limited the amount of time armies could be kept in the field. Even with the astounding combat casualties of WW I, the flu that swept the western world after that killed 40 million people, far exceeding battle deaths for the war. For the allies, the diseases (in number, mostly malaria) meant large sick calls; for the Japanese, on short rations, it meant death. Paul
|
|
|
|