CV32 -> RE: Harpoon Classic Scenarios (6/1/2008 3:31:18 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: b whittle What exactly does EMCON A mean and are there B, C versions etc? Sample EMCON plan: EMCON A: Complete silence, all active systems in standby. EMCON B: Visual communications only (flag hoist, flashing light, blinkers, semaphore, laser, etc). EMCON C: EMCON B plus civil surface search radars (LN66, Don K) on selected units (list). Designated communication vessel transmits on commercial RATT (radio teletype). EMCON D: EMCON C plus UHF/VHF radio and directional satellite uplinks. EMCON E: EMCON D plus active surface search radars. EMCON F: EMCON C plus active sonars. EMCON G: EMCON C plus active air search radars. EMCON H: Radiate all systems. quote:
How best to use the subs in this scenario - and more generally. I note they can't 'see' very far with passive sonar. One of my subs first discovered the enemy when a torpedo appeared close by out of the blue - presumably dropped by a helio - with no other indication of the fleet. Is there any way the sub can spot helios? How do you manage an approach to a well defended fleet? Can subs see helios at periscope depth? Yes, your sub can see helicopters at periscope depth, but only at very close range. They're much more likely to spot you either visually, with EO/IR gear or via radar. Approaching a well defended surface group is an exercise in patience and luck. By far the best way (and sometimes the only way, especially if you're a diesel sub), is to let them approach you. [;)] quote:
When a torpedo is on to you, is there any way of evading - changing depth, speed etc? Yes. [:)] Increase speed, change depth, change course, all in an effort to avoid a close range torpedo that is homing on you. For more distant torpedoes, you may want to play at avoiding getting inside its acquisition range or simply attempt to outrun it. We don't have acoustic countermeasures in HCE (yet). quote:
Whats the best way of firmly locating the fleets so as to launch an accurate missile attack. I had loads of missiles wandering around looking for an enemy group that had turned yellow to red but was still only located by ESM; after firing its position kept altering and the missiles had no chance. How do I do this better? If you're going to take a BOL (bearing only launch) at a target whose position has not been fixed (ie. it has that yellow uncertainty zone), your accuracy will be greatly increased if the uncertainty zone is as small as possible. Otherwise, you're often launching in the general direction of the enemy and hoping for the best. quote:
Are some missiles better than others at getting through defences? If so what determines that? Definitely. Speed and cruise altitude are the biggest factors. Faster and lower generally means a shorter time for a target to react. quote:
My Tomahawks frequently seem to fail to penetrate. In the older battlesets (other than EC2003 and Westpac), the Tomahawk had a less than stealthy RCS. That, combined with a subsonic speed (for a longer flight time), made it vulnerable. The T-hawk is much more stealthy in the EC2003 and Westpac battlesets that use the updated HCDB database. quote:
The more I play the more I enjoy [:)][:)] Good to hear. [:)]
|
|
|
|