CactusAF -> Bryant v Timpko? (7/15/2008 10:06:42 PM)
After much speculating the rumored division between the founders and owners of madminute games was confirmed when a series of posts by Norm Timpko seeking legal advice in his dispute with Adam Bryant was revealed:
The matter has become a source of talk at Wargamer and Usenet and Timpko has responded to the disclosuring by banning one members and deleting a large number of threads at his forum. This is a bad day for wargames but has been in hte works since MMG was formed.
CAF
Skeleton -> RE: Bryant v Timpko? (7/16/2008 12:09:37 AM)
Wow, this is sad. Their first game was brilliant and really drew me back into the hobby. This is a dark day indeed...
Hentzau -> RE: Bryant v Timpko? (7/16/2008 4:37:36 AM)
My advice to Norb is to take the money that he would spend on DRM and give it to Adam instead. Might even sell me a game that way. [;)] Even though I've bought it, I still can't bring myself to install their second game because it contains that securom stuff. [:@]
Sarge -> RE: Bryant v Timpko? (7/16/2008 6:33:50 AM)
What happened to the two buddies working on their dream game ?
Truly pathetic
sterckxe -> RE: Bryant v Timpko? (7/16/2008 8:11:16 AM)
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sarge What happened to the two buddies working on their dream game ?
Real Life happens - things go fubar.
eh, don't wanna play the moderator here but I think this discussion is best held outside another wargame company's forum as there are legal implications. You're all welcome to discuss this on Usenet's war-historical where the dogs bite as hard as they bark [;)]
Greetz,
Eddy Sterckx
cdbeck -> RE: Bryant v Timpko? (7/17/2008 5:59:56 AM)
Yeah, there is already a thread on this over at the Wargamer.com. I would say, because this can get "political" and legal, we should keep it over there. As Eddy said, move along, these are not the forums you are looking for. <Waves hand>
SoM
Erik Rutins -> RE: Bryant v Timpko? (7/17/2008 6:29:02 AM)
Agreed, this should really be discussed somewhere else. Locked.