Central Blue -> RE: The QF 25 pounder as 1 (8/5/2008 1:51:01 AM)
|
in the IX century they were probably more concerned with ROF and weight of shot, if they thought about such things at all. I don't think anyone had gunpowder then. I never gamed that era. I am working on a spreadsheet that considers shell weight or bursting charge. If you wanted to use shell weight and sustained rate of fire for 19th century cannon that are in the COW db, then I suppose it would work. There is always something to be said for filling the air with flying metal, you just wouldn't have as much range. Should the 24 lb RML have a higher AP than your typical 81 mm mortar that can sustain ROF between 15 and 18 rounds per minute? Probably not. The typical weight for an 81mm mortar projectile runs from 7 to 10 pounds, so it is putting considerably more flying metal in the air than could Horatio Hornblower with his best gunners on the 24 pounder -- unless they can sustain 4 rounds per minute. The interesting thing is finding "1" in the DB. I don't think it's the QF 25 pounder. But I will be posting my spreadsheet later, if I don't revise it entirely. I always thought the shell weight was kilograms, but I see that the 24 pounder is indeed shell weight 24 and the 12 pounder -- 12. "1" might not be in the DB at all, but I do have to wonder how the original values were arrived at.
|
|
|
|