quote:

ORIGINAL: eske

This seems to be an illustrative example of a futile rules discussion between players of a game.
"Surpricingly" they are not able to agree who is to benefit of the game stumbling into a situation not covered by the written rules, and thus the games probably nonintended handling of that situation.
Even if they try to augment their argumentaion by including nonrelevant mathematical theory or some poor hardworking employes dropping of words they wont convince anybody.

To you guys playing in this game: Thanx for contributing to the improvement of this game by uncovering this jinx.
Now be a bit manly about this and simply take a vote between you, how to get on with the game. Either it happened they way it did, or it must be changed before you go on. Remember to accept the majority, right. The other players also have a right to enjoy your game.

The rest of us reading this forum don't really need to witness this dragging on, do we ?

Apologize for dropping in ...

/eske

( And please don't start hazzle me now. I probably won't read it anyway [;)])

quote:

ORIGINAL: gwheelock

quote:

ORIGINAL: eske

This seems to be an illustrative example of a futile rules discussion between players of a game.
"Surpricingly" they are not able to agree who is to benefit of the game stumbling into a situation not covered by the written rules, and thus the games probably nonintended handling of that situation.
Even if they try to augment their argumentaion by including nonrelevant mathematical theory or some poor hardworking employes dropping of words they wont convince anybody.

To you guys playing in this game: Thanx for contributing to the improvement of this game by uncovering this jinx.
Now be a bit manly about this and simply take a vote between you, how to get on with the game. Either it happened they way it did, or it must be changed before you go on. Remember to accept the majority, right. The other players also have a right to enjoy your game.

The rest of us reading this forum don't really need to witness this dragging on, do we ?

Apologize for dropping in ...

/eske

( And please don't start hazzle me now. I probably won't read it anyway [;)])

Actually; no vote needed. MARSHALL has said that this is an error/bug/unintended whatever & it
is being fixed in 1.05.


I claim that Marshall is the final say on the way the game works.

quote:

ORIGINAL: NeverMan

quote:

ORIGINAL: gwheelock

quote:

ORIGINAL: eske

This seems to be an illustrative example of a futile rules discussion between players of a game.
"Surpricingly" they are not able to agree who is to benefit of the game stumbling into a situation not covered by the written rules, and thus the games probably nonintended handling of that situation.
Even if they try to augment their argumentaion by including nonrelevant mathematical theory or some poor hardworking employes dropping of words they wont convince anybody.

To you guys playing in this game: Thanx for contributing to the improvement of this game by uncovering this jinx.
Now be a bit manly about this and simply take a vote between you, how to get on with the game. Either it happened they way it did, or it must be changed before you go on. Remember to accept the majority, right. The other players also have a right to enjoy your game.

The rest of us reading this forum don't really need to witness this dragging on, do we ?

Apologize for dropping in ...

/eske

( And please don't start hazzle me now. I probably won't read it anyway [;)])

Actually; no vote needed. MARSHALL has said that this is an error/bug/unintended whatever & it
is being fixed in 1.05.


I claim that Marshall is the final say on the way the game works.

That's funny because that's exactly what Marshall did NOT say in his first post. He only then started backtracking afterwards, but whatever.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

quote:

ORIGINAL: NeverMan

quote:

ORIGINAL: gwheelock

quote:

ORIGINAL: eske

This seems to be an illustrative example of a futile rules discussion between players of a game.
"Surpricingly" they are not able to agree who is to benefit of the game stumbling into a situation not covered by the written rules, and thus the games probably nonintended handling of that situation.
Even if they try to augment their argumentaion by including nonrelevant mathematical theory or some poor hardworking employes dropping of words they wont convince anybody.

To you guys playing in this game: Thanx for contributing to the improvement of this game by uncovering this jinx.
Now be a bit manly about this and simply take a vote between you, how to get on with the game. Either it happened they way it did, or it must be changed before you go on. Remember to accept the majority, right. The other players also have a right to enjoy your game.

The rest of us reading this forum don't really need to witness this dragging on, do we ?

Apologize for dropping in ...

/eske

( And please don't start hazzle me now. I probably won't read it anyway [;)])

Actually; no vote needed. MARSHALL has said that this is an error/bug/unintended whatever & it
is being fixed in 1.05.


I claim that Marshall is the final say on the way the game works.

That's funny because that's exactly what Marshall did NOT say in his first post. He only then started backtracking afterwards, but whatever.

Huh?
I mentioned that this was an "issue" in my first post, Neverman and I never intended to backtrack on anything here so if that perception is there then I certainly apologize because it was my fault, issue, bug, oversite, screwup, miscalculation or whatever you choose to call it LOL!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

Nope, sorry sir. I said it was an "ISSUE" with the way it was being handled??? As in I am not doing it the right way or it could be done better??? I am not backtracking nor did I want to imply such a thing??? I'm not sure why this really matters???

For future reference:

ISSUE = BUG
I DID IT WRONG = BUG

BUG, BUG, BUG, BUG, BUG, BUG, BUG, BUG!

Now is that better? LOL!