Ashtar -> RE: Other deviations: free state declaration and returning leaders (11/13/2008 9:57:53 AM)
|
quote:
The leader release pp was a change that we added a little over a year ago and I do not remember the precedent (optioanl rule, etc.). The abstraction was for a nation showing a gentlemen's approach to captured leaders, officers, etc. The problem is that it can be easily exploited. and 2pp are a LOT. Some leaders are important (Nappy, Wellington, Nelson, Blucher...) but most are crap. Force Austria to a royal marriage and you get one point, break an alliance and you lose two, release Eugene and you gain two? That is crazy! In my game I indeed captured Eugene and it was clear that for 2pp it was by far convenient to release him rather then keeping him in the London tower. quote:
I am pretty sure the PP for Free State is an EiH thing, you used to get a PP by making a minor state a Client State, which in EiH meant Free State. It does make some sense IMO. I do not see why it should make sense. In EIA conquering a minor was a 0 sum business: -1 to declare war, + 1 to capture it. Now there are some states (the one with corps) which can give you a +1 pp as a total for your conquest effort(declare war, capture it and then make it free when your army is full). This extra source of pp clearly unbalance the game... I just wish people would be more careful before tampering with base game mechanics...
|
|
|
|