gwack -> Just two things keep me from buying this game..need some perspective from other Civil War Buffs (1/3/2009 1:15:32 AM)
|
I have been dropping by here reading the messages and am very close to giving FOF a try-except for two things. It appears the units are only identified in a generic way; such as the 20th Division, 47th Brigade. I have been playing a lot of AGEOD's ACW and really enjoy being able to view actual historical names..such as Hill's Corps, Heth's Division, Pettigrew's Brigade. You can also view individual listing of regiments and batteries, etc. The next issue is the map. It appears the FOF map has far fewer historical locations to fight detailed battles at..fighting the battle of Annapolis just doesn't have quite the right ring to it. It comes down to a worry about the lack of immersion in FOF. I would like to ask the owners of FOF, who love the lore and history of the Civil War, do these issues bother you to any serious degree? Or is it that once you get into FOF, these sort of things won't really be the lingering issue that they appear to be to someone who has not played the game? Also, can the game be easily modified to give historical name to units? From reading the threads here, it seems I may be missing out on a terrific game. I would like to give FOF a try-and would really appreciate some perspective from anyone who would care to take the time to give it.
|
|
|
|