Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Any News On The A.I. (5/12/2009 6:41:04 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tanan Fujiwara I'm also really worried on this one too, and we haven't had an awfull lot of feedback on this one... I have been badly burnt by Matrix with EiA before, a game that belonged to the same company, the Australian Design Group, they compleately ruined the game. Now, to be fair and honest, I must say that the monthly reports and the way the project has been handled is no where near what happened with EiA, and the computer version seems to be just like the original, and the pbem option is much more sound and well thought. The thing is that after EiA I can't trust Matrix any more. My main aim is AI play, I am no master of WiF, but I can hold my own agaisnt experienced players, so I really hope that the AI will be able to hold out. If not, this game is of no interest to me, and I'm lead to believe that same thing will happen to others... My best You should fill out the Simple Survey, which will only take a minute of your time. That is my attempt to understand the concerns you expressed here (though in an overly simplified manner[8|]). === Foir this thread in general, ... I do not want to get into a discussion on schedule beyond my monthly status reports. While I report status to Matrix weekly (and in some detail), and I believe that is the right thing to do, I begrudge the time reports take from other things. I always hated management meetings during which valuable hours were lost that could have been spent on tasks directly reltated to finishing the project. When I was in management ( I co-managed a group of 32 AI programmers et al) we had a single 1 hour meeting that was tightly scheduled: it started on time and ended on time with no exceptions. If one topic ran long, then all attendees had to agree to reduce the time on some other topic. We started at 9:00 AM and walked out of the room at 10:00 AM. The other 39 hours of the week were spent on projects.
|
|
|
|