Ballan -> (10/24/2000 10:58:00 PM)
|
German armour was (open to argument) the best in WW2. Many U.S. tankers claimed many Tiger kills when they were in fact Mk 4 or other AFVs. Brits also became very reserved about engaging German tanks, one interview I remember concern an R.A.F commander telling Montgomery during the Normandy campaign the a pilot has shot down three ME-109s in one sortie, Monty was marked to have stated that if they had been Tigers he would have been a lot happier. In SPWAW terms crews have a big impact (rightly so) on tank capability. Whilst playing the Russian long campaigns I find the Russian tanks to be be very inaccurate, especially if they move that turn. As realism goes SPWAW has got it right, the creators certainly have done their homework. Just for interest, although everyone seems to know about Wittman, there were many more German tank aces, in one instance one crew in a Hetzer destroyed 60 Russian tanks within a 24 hour period against heavy odds. And although the Elephant is generally considered a failure by modern historians during Kursk, the AVERAGE loss rate was 15-1 in favor of the Elephant, hardly a failure by any standards.
|
|
|
|