pilots (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945



Message


mutterfudder -> pilots (5/31/2009 3:06:03 PM)

Does it matter if they are bomber or fighter pilots?[&:]




Japan -> RE: pilots (5/31/2009 3:20:05 PM)

In AE ?




Feinder -> RE: pilots (5/31/2009 3:24:53 PM)

A little more info on your question please...?

-F-




Yamato hugger -> RE: pilots (5/31/2009 3:48:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mutterfudder

Does it matter if they are bomber or fighter pilots?[&:]


In WitP a pilot is a pilot. Only thing that really matters is experience. And with a few notable exceptions once a pilot is assigned, thats where he is. You arent putting P-40 pilots in B-25s flying off carriers as a movie would have you believe [:D]




DivePac88 -> RE: pilots (5/31/2009 4:34:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger


quote:

ORIGINAL: mutterfudder

Does it matter if they are bomber or fighter pilots?[&:]


In WitP a pilot is a pilot. Only thing that really matters is experience. And with a few notable exceptions once a pilot is assigned, thats where he is. You arent putting P-40 pilots in B-25s flying off carriers as a movie would have you believe [:D]


You mentioned that movie that should not be mentioned.




Nomad -> RE: pilots (5/31/2009 4:42:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DivePac88


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger


quote:

ORIGINAL: mutterfudder

Does it matter if they are bomber or fighter pilots?[&:]


In WitP a pilot is a pilot. Only thing that really matters is experience. And with a few notable exceptions once a pilot is assigned, thats where he is. You arent putting P-40 pilots in B-25s flying off carriers as a movie would have you believe [:D]


You mentioned that movie that should not be mentioned.


At least he didn't name "IT" [:)]




mutterfudder -> RE: pilots (5/31/2009 9:47:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

A little more info on your question please...?

-F-



When you check the pilot it displays fighter, bomber, transport and something else.
I was wondering if it matters what type of pilot should fly same type of group.




Barb -> RE: pilots (5/31/2009 10:05:41 PM)

He is talking about squadron/groups leader. Nope what is written in text doesnt really matters in combat. Only the numbers matters
All leaders with high aggression (i think over 65) = fighter

(or somethink like that, I am not sure on that)




mutterfudder -> RE: pilots (6/1/2009 2:34:38 AM)

TY[&o]




Crimguy -> RE: pilots (6/1/2009 4:20:44 AM)

What can't we mention?  P_E_A_R_L__H_A_R_B_O_R_?_?_?_?_?




DivePac88 -> RE: pilots (6/1/2009 4:35:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Crimguy

What can't we mention?  P_E_A_R_L__H_A_R_B_O_R_?_?_?_?_?


Oh! My god you said it, you said the name of the movie that cannot be spoken, no good will come from this, you have doomed us all. [;)]




Yamato hugger -> RE: pilots (6/1/2009 8:17:03 AM)

Oh? They made a movie about Pearl Harbor? Is it any good? [:D]




RUPD3658 -> RE: pilots (6/1/2009 11:52:48 AM)

Tora! Tora! Tora! was a great movie[8D]




morganbj -> RE: pilots (6/1/2009 3:18:47 PM)

Oh, come on guys, that "other" movie isn't AS bad as some people say.  [:-]


It's actually much worse.  [:(]






Anthropoid -> RE: pilots (6/1/2009 7:31:24 PM)

No matter how bad that movie was, that nurse chick was a hottie . . . no one can take that away from us.

[image]http://www.zuguide.com/image/Kate-Beckinsale-Pearl-Harbor.1.jpg[/image]




stuman -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 9:02:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bjmorgan

Oh, come on guys, that "other" movie isn't AS bad as some people say.  [:-]


It's actually much worse.  [:(]





Much worse than worse.




stuman -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 9:03:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

No matter how bad that movie was, that nurse chick was a hottie . . . no one can take that away from us.

[image]http://www.zuguide.com/image/Kate-Beckinsale-Pearl-Harbor.1.jpg[/image]



Yes she is.

The movie is still a travesty. And for some reason it seems to be running almost everyday on some channel here.




castor troy -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 11:47:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

No matter how bad that movie was, that nurse chick was a hottie . . . no one can take that away from us.

[image]http://www.zuguide.com/image/Kate-Beckinsale-Pearl-Harbor.1.jpg[/image]


I liked her more in a "modern" dressing...



[image]local://upfiles/13774/795E54F85A034A8D84B3F0FCFD38617B.jpg[/image]




DivePac88 -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 2:26:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

No matter how bad that movie was, that nurse chick was a hottie . . . no one can take that away from us.

[image]http://www.zuguide.com/image/Kate-Beckinsale-Pearl-Harbor.1.jpg[/image]


I liked her more in a "modern" dressing...



[image]local://upfiles/13774/795E54F85A034A8D84B3F0FCFD38617B.jpg[/image]


I think She would look just fine in no clothes at all. [:'(]




RevRick -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 3:10:46 PM)

.--. . .- .-. .-..   .... .- .-. -... --- .-.    - .... .   -- --- ...- .. .  is the only way to safely describe that, I think.

Corrected...




Crimguy -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 3:16:08 PM)

It was so bad I tried walking out. My wife agreed it sucked, but insisted we stay because it was supposed to "have a really good ending." I then saw the Doolittle raid and Ben flying a Mitchell, and almost puked in my jujubees.

It was the Howard the Duck of war movies.




rjopel -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 4:31:54 PM)

RevRick.  You need to check your spelling.  :)

You have a miskey.




DivePac88 -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 4:34:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rjopel

RevRick.  You need to check your spelling.  :)

You have a miskey.


It's Morse Code. [:D]




Anthropoid -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 9:51:25 PM)

Oh come on you curmudgeons; you tellin' me you found ZERO value in the computer-generated attack scenes? Those were pretty dramatic, and ain't no past flicks gonna compare on that basis. The battle scenes and special effects in Tora! Tora! Tora!, and Midway and any other 'better' movie about the era, quite frankly _suck_ by modern standards. Not only that, but characters and acting, and plots in most of the older movies of the war in the Pacific are also _highly_ cheesy, although I admit that this one took the Big Cheese award . . .

I will agree with you that a serious story, without so many extreme acts of 'artistic license,' the unrealistic concentration of heroism in the few main characters, the overuse of standard war-movie cliches, the excessive Rah! Rah! pro-America-rhetoric, etc., would have improved it tremendously. Indeed, its shortcomings in these areas make it an overall low-rater in my books. But if you skip these points of technical/political inaccuracy, and only focus on: (a) the cutesy inter-character dynamics (yes, even including the romances) which, if cheesy are no less unbelievable than any other cutesy inter-character dynamics in any other movie ever made about Americans during WWII; (b) the CGI battle stuff; and (c) hottie nurse, as well as just plain old (d) imagery of people, places and machines of the era provided with a high-budget modern cinematographic view--for what it is worth, then its not _so_ terrible, now is it? In effect, if you were to cut out the 75% of the movie that was bad, and focus on the 25% that was 'good,' couldn't you at least acknowledge that it had some merits? [:)]




RevRick -> RE: pilots (6/2/2009 11:16:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rjopel

RevRick.  You need to check your spelling.  :)

You have a miskey.


Grazi... thanks for the catch. corrected.. That's what you get when you use 40 year old memory banks....[8|]




bobogoboom -> RE: pilots (6/3/2009 12:09:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger


quote:

ORIGINAL: mutterfudder

Does it matter if they are bomber or fighter pilots?[&:]


In WitP a pilot is a pilot. Only thing that really matters is experience. And with a few notable exceptions once a pilot is assigned, thats where he is. You arent putting P-40 pilots in B-25s flying off carriers as a movie would have you believe [:D]

why do you have to bring up the movie that shall not be nammed[:-] just for that no ae for you.[:'(]




bobogoboom -> RE: pilots (6/3/2009 12:10:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Crimguy

What can't we mention?  P_E_A_R_L__H_A_R_B_O_R_?_?_?_?_?

i want you to know i have email both joe and erik and a ban should be comming shortly.




stuman -> RE: pilots (6/3/2009 12:11:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DivePac88


quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

No matter how bad that movie was, that nurse chick was a hottie . . . no one can take that away from us.

[image]http://www.zuguide.com/image/Kate-Beckinsale-Pearl-Harbor.1.jpg[/image]


I liked her more in a "modern" dressing...



[image]local://upfiles/13774/795E54F85A034A8D84B3F0FCFD38617B.jpg[/image]


I think She would look just fine in no clothes at all. [:'(]


wow.




bobogoboom -> RE: pilots (6/3/2009 12:11:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

No matter how bad that movie was, that nurse chick was a hottie . . . no one can take that away from us.

[image]http://www.zuguide.com/image/Kate-Beckinsale-Pearl-Harbor.1.jpg[/image]

i was to busy vommiting from the rest of the movie so yes we can take that away.




bobogoboom -> RE: pilots (6/3/2009 12:11:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

No matter how bad that movie was, that nurse chick was a hottie . . . no one can take that away from us.

[image]http://www.zuguide.com/image/Kate-Beckinsale-Pearl-Harbor.1.jpg[/image]



Yes she is.

The movie is still a travesty. And for some reason it seems to be running almost everyday on some channel here.

the bigfoot and alien channel?




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
3.235352