Silimarity with War in the South Pacific?

Silimarity with War in the South Pacific? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific

Message

Jupo -> Silimarity with War in the South Pacific? (5/28/2002 11:52:43 PM)
I looked Uncommon Valor screenshots etc. and I have noticed similarity with old 1984 released War In the South Pacific SSI game. Does anyone know Is this Uncommon Valor based on that old game. At least it looks like same but ofcourse little bit better graphics. About 10 years ago I sold that old C64 game with my C64 computer.. and about 4 years later i bought War in the south pacific game back and now days i have play it with my friend by using C64 emulator. So if it's based on that old game, I must by it as soon as possible. PS. does it have release date in Finland? Edit: WISP release year was 1986 insted of 1984

Slaughtermeyer -> comparison to WITSP (5/29/2002 12:32:11 AM)
It covers the same subject matter but also has the option to include 1943. It's more detailed, it has mine warfare and actual historical unit designations. The main difference is that WITSP has hourly order entry availability, whereas UV allows order entry only once every 24 hours. This results in a game with much a different feel, you feel much less in control in UV. You also don't get the satisfaction in UV of seeing your TF's gradually move to their destination, movement in UV is very jumpy because of the 24-hour turns. A lot can happen in 24 hours. Because you are forced in UV to continue operations for many hours that a sane commander would cancel or change based on the developing situation, the frustration level in UV is much higher, for me at least. The only reason I'd recommend getting UV is its PBEM capability, if you don't like PBEM then I would stick with WITSP.

Erik Rutins -> Um... (5/29/2002 12:47:06 AM)
Do you folks who want shorter turns really think Ghormley could pick up a line to Fletcher as a battle was starting, get a sitrep and just tell him what to do or how to change his plans? I'm afraid I don't understand the problem here. In my opinion, UV is not only accurate for its scale in terms of command level, but the need to turn local operations over to your commanders to some degree increases the suspense and immersiveness for me. Recall also that this engine will scale up to the entire War in the Pacific. Can you imagine Nimitz intervening every hour or so to give commands during a carrier battle? Imagine playing out the entire war at that time scale... I recognize some folks prefer tactical/micromanagement scales, but I really think the lack of minute control in UV (although it still has perhaps more than it should for this scale) is a positive rather than a problem. I can't count how many times I've been thankful that the designers gave me local commanders rather than making me do every last thing manually. Regards, - Erik

Jupo -> (5/29/2002 12:47:47 AM)
So basicaly 1, 4, 8 hour turns are changed to 24h turns and AI Fleet commaders are doing own movements against my will? Are CV task force battles still biggest part of the game and does it give same kind of excitement to fight those CV task force battles like in WISP.

Erik Rutins -> Hm. (5/29/2002 12:59:30 AM)
Jupo, Check out the AARs sub-forum and read through a few of them. That should give you a pretty good feel for the game. You get to tell your TFs where to go and what to do - every 24 hours. Your local commanders are actually in charge of running combat ops in between your planning phases. However, you have a fair amount of control (i.e. setting mission priorities for squadrons and TFs, etc.) Regards, - Erik

Jupo -> Re: Um... (5/29/2002 1:01:00 AM)
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Erik Rutins [B]I recognize some folks prefer tactical/micromanagement scales, but I really think the lack of minute control in UV (although it still has perhaps more than it should for this scale) is a positive rather than a problem. I can't count how many times I've been thankful that the designers gave me local commanders rather than making me do every last thing manually. - Erik [/B][/QUOTE] Maybe biggest problem is that If AI is not doing what i want, it will loose some of my intrest. In WISP when there was possible CV task force situation it was great fun to change direction of CV TF to get closer to enemy CV TF or if it seems that Japanes longer distance carrier planes were in attack range, but americans were not, them to make 180 decreese turn and avoid that attack or try to get closer in 1 turn to start carrier plane attack... against human player there was everytime something to change every 1 hour to make optimal attack against enemy CV TF. But if those who have played WISP are sure that this game is worth of buying, I will buy it and test it. :) PS. only best is good enought and WISP is one of the best games I ever played (ofcourse there is always M.U.L.E)

Jupo -> Re: Hm. (5/29/2002 1:02:49 AM)
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Erik Rutins [B]Jupo, Check out the AARs sub-forum and read through a few of them. That should give you a pretty good feel for the game. You get to tell your TFs where to go and what to do - every 24 hours. Your local commanders are actually in charge of running combat ops in between your planning phases. However, you have a fair amount of control (i.e. setting mission priorities for squadrons and TFs, etc.) Regards, - Erik [/B][/QUOTE] Thanks, I will read those.

Slaughtermeyer -> (5/29/2002 1:10:16 AM)
In UV, you cannot for example as Americans order your CV task force commander to stay away from Betty range when hunting Jap CV's. I think if Nimitz ordered his CV TF commanders to stay away from Betty range regardless of how tempting an available target was, his subordinates would listen to him. Or they at least would radio Nimitz asking for permission to enter Betty range. As Nimitz in this game, you don't have that option.

Erik Rutins -> That's incorrect... (5/29/2002 1:21:07 AM)
Slaughtermeyer, I think this is an issue of getting used to how to play the game rather than what the game can do. With all due respect, I have no problem giving my commanders orders to stay out of Betty range. There's been discussion of a "React Range" so that the React orders could be used. However, setting that aside, the Do Not React orders in combination with the Patrol and Retire orders allow you to do the following: - Set a hex, open ocean or otherwise for your TFs to stay in and patrol. - Tell them not to react more than one or two hexes from their assigned hex. - Tell them to get to the hex and then retire back towards their base, particularly if confronted by superior enemy forces. Moreover, mixing and matching your local commander's aggressiveness with these options gives you even more variety as far as the responses you can expect. I've often reacted to enemy carrier TF sightings manually by retiring to extend range and get closer to my own LBA when I have enough warning to issue orders - but I've also had my commanders do it thanks the orders I gave them the previous day. Regards, - Erik

IKerensky -> Re: Um... (5/29/2002 1:30:53 AM)
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Erik Rutins [B]Do you folks who want shorter turns really think Ghormley could pick up a line to Fletcher as a battle was starting, get a sitrep and just tell him what to do or how to change his plans? I'm afraid I don't understand the problem here. In my opinion, UV is not only accurate for its scale in terms of command level, but the need to turn local operations over to your commanders to some degree increases the suspense and immersiveness for me. - Erik [/B][/QUOTE] And of you do think it is normal that Mc Arthur send a line every day to all his ship to tell them how what portion of they air component need to be flying ? setting the CAP ? enquiring about the pilot stats and asking them to rest ? Plotting the route of all and every convoy ? subs ? Why is the problem of when we ask for a bit more control we are rebuffed as it isn't operationnal scale and when we ask for less control and more automation we are rebuffed too for the very sake of detail ? Why did you provide us with the tactical command feeling but just keep it away from our grasp , is it a new Tantalus torture ? Frankly if you want to keep us with those 24h turn , ok, but get away with all the micro management too !! If we cant orer our TF to react to the ennemy we haven't to order them how to use their air component too ! ( at last the rest/CAP part ).

Slaughtermeyer -> Re: That's incorrect... (5/29/2002 1:39:01 AM)
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Erik Rutins [B]Slaughtermeyer, - Set a hex, open ocean or otherwise for your TFs to stay in and patrol. - Tell them not to react more than one or two hexes from their assigned hex. - Tell them to get to the hex and then retire back towards their base, particularly if confronted by superior enemy forces. [/B][/QUOTE] This would work and be appropriate if the Amercan carriers are SE of Guadalcanal and a weaker Jap CV force was approaching from the NW, but if the Jap force came from the NE (out of Betty support range), the logical thing to do would be to move more than two hexes to chase after them so the Japs won't be able to use their carrier plane range advantage.

Erik Rutins -> Reactions... (5/29/2002 1:55:45 AM)
Slaughtermeyer, There are some grey areas where the react command can get you into trouble. I use do not react in those areas (or you can use more cautious commanders with react). The react range suggestion was noted and I can't rule anything like that out. If we decide it makes sense and will help players, it will be in there. Even if we don't see it in UV, we may see it in WitP. My opinion remains that the existing commands cover (in my experience) the vast majority of situations adequately while keeping things from getting too complex or micro-management oriented. I questioned the general assertion that the game won't allow players to keep their carriers out of Betty range. I still disagree with that, but I agree that there are many ways to shoot yourself in the foot. Kerensky, See my reply to your identical post on the poll thread. Regards, - Erik

FAdmiral -> (5/29/2002 2:01:49 AM)
I think the 24 hour min. is much more realistic than hour by hour would be. Remember in this game, we are seeing reports by the computer instantly instead of getting them by radio messages some time??? later. Co-ordination of attacks and logistic undertakings by one single person (player) is many times more efficient than it was by the many leaders & commanders in history. In other words, we have it EASY !!!!! JIM BERG, SR.

Jupo -> (5/29/2002 3:03:13 AM)
I'm propably buying this game, but what would be easyest way to buy it from Finland.

Paul Vebber -> (5/29/2002 3:12:20 AM)
try: Duchet Computers (england, france, italy, scandinavia) Chepstow - NP16 5LA - U.K. Customers hotline: 0044 (0) 1291 625780 IF not them there area couple others serving Europe on our Dealers page

Drex -> (5/29/2002 3:13:06 AM)
I can't wait to try out the 24hr turns. i don't want to be deluged with decisions every 4 hours or so. 24 hours seems realistic to me.

Jupo -> (5/29/2002 3:20:46 AM)
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Paul Vebber [B]try: Duchet Computers (england, france, italy, scandinavia) Chepstow - NP16 5LA - U.K. Customers hotline: 0044 (0) 1291 625780 IF not them there area couple others serving Europe on our Dealers page [/B][/QUOTE] Ok, Thanks

Zakamoto -> (5/29/2002 3:23:26 AM)
Jupo, I played War in the South Pacific quite a bit "back in the day". I had it on the Apple II+ platform. The same designer did both, and of course its generally the same subject matter. I liked WiSP a lot, but in my opinion UV is a MUCH better game. There is an immense amount of meaningful detail in UV without the burden of micromanagement on the player. I am truly impressed by this fact. I do not balk at complexity, but to be honest this is better. I have already seen some limitations in the AI, but in general I am happy with that too. At this point it seems pretty darn good, but of course the real action is vs. a human opponent anyway. As for sources in Finland - got me there. One of many Euro's here will be of more use to you there. Kampai! Zakamoto

IKerensky -> (5/29/2002 3:32:36 AM)
For duchet you can order on line at [url]www.duchet.com[/url] I can insure you they are great service and kind people. I phone them at least once a month and they still dont spit into my package :p

Jupo -> (5/29/2002 11:07:32 AM)
Well my first internet shopping is now done, hopefully something good is comming via snailmail. :)

Page: [1]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.609375