[PLZ REMOVE] (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition



Message

WITPPL -> [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 1:07:42 PM)

PLZ REMOVE: EVERYTHING IS FINE!!!

Patched Scen 2. Wrong data, Its another MYOKO class instead.

Cheers
R



treespider -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 1:19:11 PM)

So are you saying we should ---what is the word --- DISREGARD? [;)]



BrucePowers -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 1:27:42 PM)

That would be the word[:D]



treespider -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 1:29:45 PM)

So we should not in any way shape or form pay any attention to this posting?



fbs -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 1:50:09 PM)


Alright, I'm going to disregard the first paragraph.

Now, for the second paragraph.. oh no!! Myoko is wrong??

Cheers [:D]
fbs



BrucePowers -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 2:07:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: treespider

So we should not in any way shape or form pay any attention to this posting?


Yes I think that is what we should do.[:D]



Crimguy -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 2:12:14 PM)

WHAT?



BigBadWolf -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 2:15:55 PM)

Again? How much disregard can one achieve? I mean, I'm still disregarding that other thread...



Terminus -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 2:59:31 PM)

I think we should disregard this "AE" game that everybody seems to think they're playing. It's obviously a communal hallucination.



moose1999 -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 3:15:12 PM)

This is not a thread.



stuman -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 5:33:53 PM)

I like this thread. I choose not to disregard it.



witpqs -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 6:39:36 PM)

I can't disregard this thread because I'm too busy ignoring it.



RevRick -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 7:58:09 PM)

Oops, I was going to post about disregarding the first poster, but I think you really ought to disregard this post. So, disregard this disregard note.



Cap Mandrake -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 8:09:27 PM)

I read this thread therefore it exists. I looks like others have read it as well, but that could simply be a trick of the mind.

I could will this thread to be removed but it will still exist. Ouch, my head is beginning to hurt.



BrucePowers -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 8:12:12 PM)

If a thread is not read does it still exist?



scott64 -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 8:23:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BrucePowers

If a thread is not read does it still exist?

Only in ones dreams. [:D]



KenchiSulla -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 8:26:14 PM)

It exists in your world... now go back to your own dimension...[:D]



witpqs -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 10:05:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

I read this thread therefore it exists. I looks like others have read it as well, but that could simply be a trick of the mind.

I could will this thread to be removed but it will still exist. Ouch, my head is beginning to hurt.


Welcome to AE, Cap.



Terminus -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 10:12:45 PM)

This thread is still here? Wonder why it's still in existence, with the weight of disregarding lumped on it.



whippleofd -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 10:21:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

This thread is still here? Wonder why it's still in existence, with the weight of disregarding lumped on it.


Too much disreguarding the disreguard.

Whipple



stuman -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/28/2009 11:23:40 PM)

This is my favorite thread.



Brigs -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/29/2009 12:00:36 AM)

I completely disagree.
The disregardization of this thread goes against my whole reason for being here. Besides, it just doesn't make any sense.




Grollub -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/29/2009 10:52:24 AM)

If a post is typed in the woods and no one is there to read it, is it then regarded?



chesmart -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/29/2009 11:43:11 AM)

Disregarded



british exil -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/29/2009 12:20:22 PM)

Would s.o please enlighten me and tell me which part of the post is to be removed and which part is to disregarded.

I find it very confusing? Is WiTPAE just as confusing?

(S.O who has placed the game on his christmas wish list, but thinks he has to buy it himself and find excuses to explain to GF why another game WAS needed.)




DivePac88 -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/29/2009 12:46:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Grollub

If a post is typed in the woods and no one is there to read it, is it then regarded?


If you hadn't of told the story, then it would have been disregarded before it was regarded. Thus it would have been a pre-disregarded post, therefore also a post-disregarded-post. [:D]



Oldguard1970 -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/29/2009 12:52:21 PM)

Remove the parts that are to be disregarded. Pay no attention to the rest.

This is NOT a confusing thread. AE players, and WITP players before them, need emotional release from time to time, and "risregard" threads serve that purpose better than more public displays of pure insanity.

There is nothing confusing about our collective hallucination called AE. It is merely maddening and addicting beyond belief. It should be bought right away.

GF can be disregarded.



british exil -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/29/2009 1:19:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OldGuard1970


GF can be disregarded.

[:D]

Hmmm wonder if she might disregard that comment!



Chickenboy -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/29/2009 2:04:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BrucePowers

If a thread is not read does it still exist?

Only if it's in the woods and a bear falls and no one is there to hear it. No wait. I'm confused. What were we talking about?



Chickenboy -> RE: [PLZ REMOVE] (11/29/2009 2:05:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Brigs

I completely disagree.
The disregardization of this thread goes against my whole reason for being here. Besides, it just doesn't make any sense.



What doesn't make any sense-your reason for being here? I agree. I disregard you sir!



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.7792969