JWE -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (10/24/2011 7:13:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nikademus quote:
ORIGINAL: Apollo11 Hi all, quote:
ORIGINAL: Termius Not QUITE the same. A concrete wall has no crumple zone, after all. I think it is essentially the same... at such speeds (around 100 km/h) it is almost irrelevant if you hit another car, concrete wall or some animal (even as small as rabbit)... Leo "Apollo11" Not really. While remaining quite hazzardous, with the two cars hitting each other there's a greater chance that a good portion of the kinetic energy will bleed off in other directions, aided by crumple zones and the "give" of the two structures allowing each vehicle to move in different directions away from each other etc etc. A concrete wall has no give......the classic immovable object. All this test proves is.....DONT RUN INTO A CONCRETE WALL AT 100+ MPH.......you won't walk away. Do agree with Leo, Nik. While the physics of collisions leads to certain areas of potential physical survival under specific circumstances, at 100 kph, you are toast. Don't care what little safety car you are in. it's a random, and you are at the bottom of the calc no matter how may frikkin crumple zones or airbags you got. At a headon at 100 kph, you are dead, unless you are unbelieveably lucky. Even then, you are in hospital for a long, long time; and you will never be the same. Govt safety bullshit is not realiy.
|
|
|
|