StG 44 usage in late WWII (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Last Stand Arnhem



Message


GaryChildress -> StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/7/2010 2:09:22 AM)

I understand it was usually elite German units or Eastern Front units which got the StG 44. If a unit was an elite unit, how many StG 44s would be in a squad? Would all riflemen in the squad be issued StG44s or would just one or two men out of the full squad and the rest be armed with 98s?




sol_invictus -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/8/2010 2:04:17 PM)

I don't think any unit was completed issued with 44s. It was more like the MP-40s. Squad leaders or other unit leaders would get the 44s while most would retain the 98s. There just weren't that amny 44s produced to allow a wide distrubution.




7A_Woulf -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/8/2010 4:35:55 PM)

Wasn't the StuG 44 replacing Kar98's, while the squad leaders retained their MP40?

But as you said:"I don't think any unit was completed issued with 44s", although there were a plan to create "Sturm Squads", purely armed with MP40 and later StuG 44. But during 1944 these were mostly used in Volksgrenadier Divisions to compensate for lack of training and marksmanship.




squadleader_id -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/9/2010 12:36:00 AM)

Some info on StG.44 in VG battalions here.




final_drive -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/9/2010 12:43:47 PM)

OK, risking that this might be considered a pet peeve of mine: contrary to widespread belief, MP43/MP44/StG were produced in sufficient numbers to be used in concentrated quantities by quite a number of units. There's enough primary source material that shows this and enough (mostly German language) secondary sources describing it. Also, deliveries had usually not much to do with the unit being considered as 'elite' (be it at the time or rather in post-war times).

In fact, this weapon, for the first time combining lightweight automatic firepower and rifle accuracy and range, brought along a whole new tactical concept: the MP-Zug, later renamed, along with the change of the weapon's designation, to Sturm-Zug ('assault platoon'). The new concept was to replace the previous basic tactical concept of the German infantry, which had evolved around the squad's le.MG with support of the riflemens' Kar98k. The final goal was to fully replace both the MP, the Kar and originally also the le.MG of all rifle platoons with the MP43/MP44/StG, something which was envisaged to be accomplished by the earliest somewhere in late 1945.

Deliveries of the MP43/MP44/StG44 were twofold:

1. the official ones, assigned in great quantities to dedicated units by the Organisational section of OKH. After initial troop trials and once production had reached sufficient quantities, delivery in earnest was started in the beginning of 1944, whereby priority was given to infantry divisions on the Eastern Front: their Grenadier companies, in desperate need of any boost in strength, were to receive enough weapons so they could each completely equip one of its three platoons. The aim was to gradually equip every infantry division in this way, one after another. Newly established divisions in the Summer of '44 (29. Welle) also received enough weapons to equip one platoon per rifle company. The Volksgrenadier-Divisions of the 32. Welle however were to even receive the double quantity, allowing for two out of three platoons to be equipped as such. Actual deliveries in big quantities did happen, as strength returns of Autumn 44 show.

2. deliveries in smaller quantities, meant as individual replacements for other regular SMGs like the MP40. The infantry branch wanted to prevent such deliveries since they caused both the loss of the advantage of employing the weapon in concentrated quantities and problems in ammunition supply. However, the General Quartermaster was confused by the weapon's designation as MP43/MP44 (Maschinenpistole - SMG) which did not make clear its different tactical capacities. This name had originally been used to mislead Hitler into allowing the weapon's production, in spite of his disapproval because of the logistic difficulties in producing a new model of infantry ammunition.

Now, the official MP/StG-Züge were never to have been equipped with 9mm SMGs. The concept is completely linked to the development of the new weapon. The misunderstanding (which found its way into the US Army's Handbook on the German Army) is very likely also a simple consequence of the mere fact that the StG was first called MP, and the KStN (TOEs) of 1.9.44 establishing the MP-Züge in the Volksgrenadier-divisions did so without specifying the weapon type (i.e. which model of MP, as this detail was not added to the KStN-templates): read like that it could be just any MP. However, all other contemporary accompanying documents (manuals, formation orders...) leave no doubt: the concept of the MP-Zug was there to be used with the MP44 from the start (Later the distinction was added within the KStN, by using square brackets to show StG).

However, wanting to further spread the positive effects of the mere concentration of firepower in the MP-Zug, OKH in October 44 ordered units which had not yet received their big deliveries of StG to already start making similar makeshift assault (reserve) platoons by concentrating as much as possible any MP, small number of StG and semi-automatic rifles (K41 and K43) on hand.

It is likely that this make-shift order was gradually also carried out by Panzergrenadier units, which until then had not received large deliveries of MP44/StG44. This was the case because the PzGrenadiere did not depend from the Infantry branch, had their own different tactical doctrine (around two leMG per squad) and with the added firepower and shockpower of the accompanying armour on hand were considered to be less of a priority for the rearmement. The only exception to this were the Pz.Brigades 105 to 108, formed in August 44, which had a specific set of KStN specifying the use of the MP-Zug. Later on, the Sturmzug would finally be established into the motorised Panzergrenadier units, with one such platoon per company. Although the KStN concerned were already dated 1.11.44, the general order for reorganising along these lines actually only came in early 45.

Finally, what did an official MP-Zug / Sturm-Zug in a Grenadier-Kompanie look like? The first version of early '44 consisted of three similarly equipped squads, with every man equipped with the MP43, except for those riflemen equipped with the rifle grenade launcher and the scoped weapon in each squad, who both kept these weapons. No lMG's remained with the platoon. After some adaptions due to combat experience, the final version of late 44 reinserted the three le.MG as they were still deemed necessary: one remained in company reserve, and two were being carried into combat by the platoon's third squad, the so-called Feuergruppe. The two other Gruppen were entirely equipped with the StG44. The rifle grenade launchers were concentrated at Platoon HQ level, and the sniper rifles at Coy HQ level. Except for concentrating firepower, this organisation also facilitated command and control in the meagerly trained late-war units. It was this version that was retained for the model organisation 'Infanterie-Division 45' to which all existing divisions were to reorganize in early 45. If the weapons and ammo were available that is...




7A_Woulf -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/9/2010 8:57:06 PM)

[&o]

Nice piece of info there!  [8D][sm=sign0031.gif]




sol_invictus -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/10/2010 3:02:52 PM)

Yes some nice info. I wonder how many units were actually fully equiped with the 44s though. By 1944 even mundane TOE items rarely reached the ideal quantity. I have my doubts that many units reached a full compliment of 44s.




final_drive -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/15/2010 1:04:36 AM)

Yes, many items got into short supply by the end of the war, but others were priotarized. Among those priorities was the MP43/MP44/StG44. Production peaked in the month of November 1944, when 55,100 weapons were produced (376,984 as total production figure from July '43 till 'February 45, taken from Handrich's 'Sturmgewehr 44').

To carry out a final large scale troop trial during the Summer of '44, 1. Infanterie-Division was sent 2,400 MP44, as recorded in the diary of OKH/Org.Abt.IIIc on June 14th 1944. This was enough to equip all of its riflemen (not just one platoon per division as was still the usual amount delivered to Divisions on the Eastern Front).

A report from the OKH dated December 2nd 1944, points out that by that date, out of 179 Infantry Divisions (including VGD, Div.(bo.) and LW-Feld.Div.) already 56 had been equipped with two Sturm-Züge per Kompanie, whereas 10 still had only one such platoon. The rest was still to be rearmed. 

Reports of individual VGDs I have, show the large amount of StG.44 still on hand (500 to 1,000 each), in the beginning of January 1945, i.e. after their commitment in the Ardennes. Compare that to the total figure of 8,449 such weapons already lost in the single month of October '44, when VGDs were first committed...

Talking about 'mundaine' items, ironically, both ammo and magazine (+ pouch) production couldn't follow the production rate increase of the weapon proper. The former meant that new weapons couldn't be shipped out to units in the same rate as they were being produced, the second meant that in December '44 on average there were only three magazines available for every weapon in use, thereby affecting its combat value.




7A_Woulf -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/15/2010 2:02:37 AM)

Well, how about units in the Market Garden area then? Do you have any info on that?




final_drive -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/15/2010 7:08:15 AM)

Not really the operation I've researched detailed strength reports for. But as you know many to most units committed there were reorganizing or training/replacement units, not frontline Infanterie Divisions of the Eastern Front, - the infantry divisions already in the West were not a priority for large scale deliveries -, nor were any of the newly raised VGDs employed in the sector (at least not in the initial phase).
So if any MP44 were available, most likely they came in smaller quantities, as described above. 
One exception: big chance that Pz.Brig.107 was equipped with big quantities in its 1. and 2. PzGrenKp (according to the relevant KStN 56 each, in two platoons each). The Pz.Brigades 105-108 were newly created units with a peculiar 'modernised' establishment, which had been earmarked for use on the Eastern Front.  The documents relative to their creation often refer to the use of the MP44.




7A_Woulf -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/15/2010 12:48:34 PM)

Thx mate. [:)]




sol_invictus -> RE: StG 44 usage in late WWII (9/15/2010 2:06:59 PM)

Good info final drive. It seems that the MP-44s were more available than I had thought.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
3.53125