AI Comparison LSA vs TLD (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Last Stand Arnhem



Message


polemotatos -> AI Comparison LSA vs TLD (11/4/2010 10:52:12 PM)

Just a quick question for those CC fans who have played both CC:LSA and CC:TLD. How does the tactical AI compare between the two products? I would be particularly interested in a brief comparison of the offensive tac AI for both games.

I really came to love LSA after the first patch, and I am happy with the job the tac AI now does. I am thinking seriously about buying TLD but would probably not do so if the AI is not more or less as good...




Andrew Williams -> RE: AI Comparison LSA vs TLD (11/5/2010 6:48:38 AM)

I don't think there have been any tactical AI changes from WaR/tLD/LSA

correct me if I'm wrong, anyone.




RD Oddball -> RE: AI Comparison LSA vs TLD (11/5/2010 3:28:35 PM)

Items updated on LSA posted here with a section on the AI:

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2592573

Polemotatos the same is true of each build in their respective forums if you want a list of exactly what was updated.

As has been stated elsewhere we have plans to back-port the LSA pathing and AI improvements to WaR and TLD.




Amgot -> RE: AI Comparison LSA vs TLD (11/5/2010 5:51:01 PM)

RD_Oddball, that's some great news! I'm currently playing a GC on TLD and I am eagerly awaiting the pathing improvements.




Tejszd -> RE: AI Comparison LSA vs TLD (11/5/2010 6:42:20 PM)

Must agree with Amgot that getting the pathing improvements in WAR and TLD is great news!!!




GS_Schimpf -> RE: AI Comparison LSA vs TLD (11/5/2010 9:42:26 PM)

can't wait to see those improvement being brought to TLD and WAR. Very good news!!!




RD Oddball -> RE: AI Comparison LSA vs TLD (11/5/2010 10:28:30 PM)

It's not new news as I'd mentioned it back in August but I'm glad you guys are receiving it and are happy about it nonetheless.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.921875