RE: Sov Airforce out of control?

RE: Sov Airforce out of control? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series

Message

raizer -> RE: Sov Airforce out of control? (12/27/2010 4:05:04 PM)
at kursk, from all accounts Ive read-which are numerous-most, if not all agree that there was a minor german advantage to over all parity regarding control of the sky

ComradeP -> RE: Sov Airforce out of control? (12/27/2010 4:22:22 PM)
quote: how's it possible? The game I took furthest was June '42 and most fighter groups had very few air kills. The bulk of air kills were by bombers and my guess is that they refer to the planes caught on the ground on the first turn. That's probably because few Soviet planes were flying support missions in battles. If they don't do that, they won't really suffer many losses.

Grymme -> RE: Sov Airforce out of control? (12/27/2010 4:50:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: abulbulian quote: ORIGINAL: Grymme Helpless seem very knowledgable. So i would be carefull in writing of his research as "fantasy" I think at least one factor here has been ignored though (on both side of the argument) : Lend Lease aircraft. Anyway Albulbulian what is your source when you say the soviets should have 2 100 available aircraft in january 1942? Maybe there is some misunderstanding. Since they had around 20K combat aircraft at the beginning of the war. Also the forces in the eastern might have had some significance but one should remember that even if there were lets say 4100 aircraft in the Far East then these were intact and didnt have to be replaced. So all new production could go to the west and they even weakened the Far East front to reinforce the west. With lend lease, production and reinforcements from far east 15K airforce in 1942 seems reasonable. But they were not all operational at the same time. thats another matter. http://operationbarbarossa.net/Fast-Facts/Soviet-fast-facts.html Well my only point to this thread was the issue with sov air getting 'out of control'. The numbers Helpless posted were a bit off from t he numbers I had seen for: 1) combat/util aircraft in theater 2) combat/util aircraft that the game represents * maybe those were more prod #'s and not actual planes in use. We can argues the numbers till we blue in face, but the problem in the game still exists that sov air force is getting too large too fast and too easily. So the bigger issue is that even with a great start and destroying 14k sov aircraft by 6/42, the axis will be at a 1:4 ratio in terms of planes. This is very inconsistent with anything historical. You don't have to read many books on east front to understand that it wasn't about till summer 43 when the sov were starting to gain air supremacy by sheer numbers. To have this happen in summer 42 when the axis player is doing 'better' than historical is an issue for ME. Now some people may not care too much, but I'd like to do what I can to make this game better. He researched this for six months, developed the game and quotes sources. You say he is of. But what is your source? I am not trying to be a dick here. I have a genuine interest since i am developing my own Barbarossa scenario. Where are the figures in your first post from? My development, se below. http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2600027

MechFO -> RE: Sov Airforce out of control? (12/27/2010 6:29:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Helpless quote: Where I agree there is a problem is with the numbers on the map, mainly with the Soviets. As I posted before, there seems to be some weird Support Needs calculation going on which means that the 250 Support Squads can't even support a full KG. This means that Airfield counters can be overloaded at 70-80 level bombers (ignoring HQ Support bonus). If this could be f.e. doubled, this would help a lot. Fighters/Recon/Tac Bombers can already be packed to a much higher practical limit. They can support, this is just a display issue. Great, Can you tell me what the rough support need of a f.e. a level bomber is? 1 bomber = 1 Support Squad? quote: ORIGINAL: Helpless quote: What I think is needed is to force the AI to pack the Airfield with a minimum 250-300 AC Similar formula already exist. Ai is creating new Air Bases based on the amount of air groups in game. Maybe this should be bumped up?

MechFO -> RE: Sov Airforce out of control? (12/27/2010 6:34:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ComradeP quote: how's it possible? The game I took furthest was June '42 and most fighter groups had very few air kills. The bulk of air kills were by bombers and my guess is that they refer to the planes caught on the ground on the first turn. That's probably because few Soviet planes were flying support missions in battles. If they don't do that, they won't really suffer many losses. I think this is related to their low morale. AIUI, low morale and bad leaders lead to fewer sorties. Fewer sorties in turn leads to low losses, which in turn leads to the rapid growth in the Soviet Air Force. I see 2 solutions, 1) make operational losses much more dependant upon group skill, this will kill more planes simply from flying, but because they fly so seldomly, this might still not help a big deal. This might mean that Axis Minor AF's have to be bumped up. 2) radically increase lost aircraft from training missions, again if possible limited to low experienced units. I wouldn't mess with the historical build rates.

Smirfy -> RE: Sov Airforce out of control? (12/27/2010 7:09:39 PM)
I sincerely hope there is a sensible handling of the airwar put in place before WiTE 2. The Russians flew 30,000 plus sorties in the Kuban campaign some 8,000 interdiction sorties before Kursk the Germans some 27,000 during the 10 days of Kursk. On D. Day in Normandy there was some 15k sorties in one day. How in the world does this present system come close to a rational implementation based upon usability and historical basis. I'm glad the system is being looked at please please please lets get the airwar in proportion to the land war

MengJiao -> RE: Sov Airforce out of control? (12/27/2010 7:27:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Smirfy I sincerely hope there is a sensible handling of the airwar put in place before WiTE 2. The Russians flew 30,000 plus sorties in the Kuban campaign some 8,000 interdiction sorties before Kursk the Germans some 27,000 during the 10 days of Kursk. On D. Day in Normandy there was some 15k sorties in one day. How in the world does this present system come close to a rational implementation based upon usability and historical basis. I'm glad the system is being looked at please please please lets get the airwar in proportion to the land war About Kursk: despite those 27K German sorties, the Russian planes still did significant damage to the Germans.

Smirfy -> RE: Sov Airforce out of control? (12/27/2010 7:41:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MengJiao quote: ORIGINAL: Smirfy I sincerely hope there is a sensible handling of the airwar put in place before WiTE 2. The Russians flew 30,000 plus sorties in the Kuban campaign some 8,000 interdiction sorties before Kursk the Germans some 27,000 during the 10 days of Kursk. On D. Day in Normandy there was some 15k sorties in one day. How in the world does this present system come close to a rational implementation based upon usability and historical basis. I'm glad the system is being looked at please please please lets get the airwar in proportion to the land war About Kursk: despite those 27K German sorties, the Russian planes still did significant damage to the Germans. I dont want to get into the German v Russian debate, right now there is an unworkable system for the scale of the game we have. I would like a better system and then worry about balancing the two sides. We are not seeing 27,000 sorties in ten days if we were come back in a week when the AI has finished its turn. What is needed is a better system to represent the intesity of the airwar without losing the detail of machines and units which IMHO means we need to have the airwar controled at a higher level than we do now. Right now an airbase with 10 planes breaks the stacking limit. (thank you redmarkus). If that cant make you see the nonsense of the model nothing will.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.59375